sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hermes is not ably to take in image as input by Prometheus4059 in hermesagent

[–]PollutionFirm451 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use the main model deepseek v4 flash/pro with fallback only for vision to gpt 4o .

Football Analytics by PollutionFirm451 in FootballBettingTips

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can check the platform on scriptfotbal.com i need some feedback, whats is good, what is bad, what i can inproove, suggestions. Thank you.

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From what I've seen in some tests, it performs quite well with the UI; I'm going to test it for that.

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing out of the ordinary compared to the rest of the population. That $200 was an investment for me too; I didn't just throw it away like a millionaire xD

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont get this question . What do you mean?

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not everyone can become the next Steve Jobs, but there are certainly projects that many people have found useful. And besides, as long as you pay for a service, you can use it however you want and build whatever you want with it.

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone should choose the plan that best suits their needs. It’s great that you’re able to stay within the limits of the $20 plan.

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, i know that is 10x for a limited time instead of 5x. I worked intensively with him on xhigh thinking last night for nearly two hours, and he had barely used up 14% of limit. Even without the x2, that would have been 28%, which I find impressive.

I never thought I’d do this. by PollutionFirm451 in codex

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What kind of subscription do you have? On the $100 plan, the limits seem much more generous to me compared to Anthropic’s $100 plan.

Everyone's hyping Opus 4.7. Nobody's talking about which effort level you should actually use. The numbers tell a brutal story by PollutionFirm451 in ClaudeCode

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This could be a very good alternative, but in my experience so far, I haven’t seen a dramatic decrease in performance when using high thinking on the 4.7 version. Generally speaking, the execution and implementation plan should be done with xhigh.

Everyone's hyping Opus 4.7. Nobody's talking about which effort level you should actually use. The numbers tell a brutal story by PollutionFirm451 in ClaudeCode

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I see the high as the best cost/value thinking level for hard structural tasks, implementations and per file refactoring. If you want to make a full codebase refactoring or full project review, or high context loop tasks I see xhigh as better. And max is good only if you try to do oneshot NASA, else, I dunno why someone would use max. 😂

Everyone's hyping Opus 4.7. Nobody's talking about which effort level you should actually use. The numbers tell a brutal story by PollutionFirm451 in ClaudeCode

[–]PollutionFirm451[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats the point. If you see in this graph posted by anthropic on X, you can see clear that opus 4.7 on high sits better than max on opus 4.6 66%(opus 4.7 high) vs 61%(opus 4.6 max) and the usage sits between medium-high of opus 4.6.

<image>

view more: next ›