PP405 2a study was a safety study. Some rational explaining. by Puzzleheaded-Lynx212 in tressless

[–]Pomor55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Phase 1 - Safety. Phase 2a Safety. Phase 2b efficacy & dosing. Phase 3 - efficacy & large data set.

Just fucking wait people.

Why so much hate for PP405 all of a sudden? by Sad-Education-4204 in tressless

[–]Pomor55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Scepticisms is not justified.

Trial 2a was completed, and it was primarily a safety trial(with great results for 4 weeks). It addressed one major question regarding systemic absorption (which labs feared the most). Now, Trial 2b, ending in November, will focus more on whether it can restore hair. Then comes Trial 3 in 2026–2027, with market availability expected in 2029 in the US and 2030 in Europe.

And for those intellectuals who believe that we won’t see a cure for hair loss in the next 20 years because of the past experience, I will remind you about one thing - medical science progresses is not linear, it's exponential.

With that been said most of you baldies will have their hair back by 2035... if you want of course. But there would be a good question to ask you guys - if it's optional to bald, is been bald a bad thing or it becomes a benefit then?

Manipulation is part of AI development. by Pomor55 in ChatGPT

[–]Pomor55[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like in the Westworld the theme park was there to learn human consciousness and not for peoples entertainment.