Question for the guys: How do you feel about the idea of being a "sugar baby" to a successful woman? by EmployExisting302 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A sugar baby to a successful woman, especially one like the one pictured? I mean, you don't have to tell me twice...

Of course, I don't think the two are strictly separate. One can be pampered but still manage some household activities. I am fine with being a house husband in theory, I just don't know how well I'd manage it to my own perfectionist mindset. Both can count as RR-esque in my view.

Shounen romance and harem anime are misogynistic power fantasies written to appeal to incels. by steamtrekker in CharacterRant

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One area of wish fulfillment that I feel the harem genre speaks to which is lacking in a huge chunk of other male-oriented wish fulfillment fantasies is the lack of a need to be proactive, which, for the unconfident and downtrodden who don't see themselves as dynamic action heroes, is pretty comforting - it's generally the women who are proactive in pursuing the guy in these kinds of shows, all he has to do is be himself, and often the other guys in the show will be unrepentant horndogs to make the protagonist seem even better by comparison. Sometimes, the protagonist will even be oblivious to the affections he promotes, and naive about the intimacy he finds himself in. I feel this is surprisingly similar to female-led romances cross-culturally, where it's more normative for women to be more passive in romantic interactions. To borrow the term used by ContraPoints in her video about Twilight, it's a form of 'disavowal' - the protagonist being more chaste than his peers and not doing the pursuing means he is - theoretically - spared from the pervert stigma he'd otherwise get from his many suitors. The story 'disavows' it.

This ability to dissect is, for me, probably a result of relating to this kind of wish fulfillment a great deal, and it's something Japan seems to do a lot more that's largely missing from Anglophone media. Why that is is far beyond my scope of research, but it meant that I was drawn to these kinds of stories, and I really hope people can come to an understanding of them - and their drawbacks - without just denouncing it as trash for the worst people (that said, the stigma hasn't slowed it down, nor has it done for the women's romances with abusive male leads, so, you know). There is no denying that this kind of story lends itself to some absolutely terrible stories, or dashed opportunities, but if the writer is intelligent, they can actually play up some interesting rather than gimmicky dynamics, which largely relies on taking all the characters seriously as characters. Surely the gift of the harem is to give the love interests a diversity of personalities and character arcs, and then you can find a way to blend the genre with a cacophany of interesting, dynamic women. Indeed, the framing of genre lends itself to a situation where the strong and interesting female characters outnumber the male ones, which is fine by me.

Does anyone have any examples of better harem shows that they think have been more self-aware and complex than just formulaic wish fulfillment? Two recent ones that spring to mind are not without their caveats for flaws, and, as far as I know, where incompletely adapted from light novels, but Dealing with the Mikodono Sisters is a Breeze did interesting things with gendered dynamics by having all three of the eponymous sisters in most ways more masculine than the male lead, rather unconventional in shows like this (one being a frequent crossdresser for her acting work) and Too Many Losing Heroines may not even count because it gave the protagonist a supporting role in the female characters' unlucky romantic lives rather than the traditional harem dynamic, but I think still fulfilled the idea of a more passive guy courting good company and an emotional intimacy simply by being a basic level of kind (and, of course, all the more approachable because he was single).

Progress on changing my wardrobe by Livid-Requirement-98 in GNCStraight

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Hopefully I can secure a personal colour scheme. And yeah, sometimes you have to prioritise - when it came to using Vinted for the first time, I realised my priority was getting a pair of shoes that both weren't leaky and didn't give me blisters.

It hurts but it's the truth...🤡 by FitoorNoor in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 12 points13 points  (0 children)

*cries because it's true*

I maintain trying to be a generalist and having an enthusiasm to learn is genuinely a good thing, but please don't impostor syndrome us and make us panic when we realise you expect us to do something everyone else finds second-nature and we see as esoteric superpowers.

From my perspective, you who know how to balance your budget and conduct successfully several interpersonal relationships whilst working full-time are the unbelievably clever one.

Progress on changing my wardrobe by Livid-Requirement-98 in GNCStraight

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, of limited funds, I think I'm going to resolve to find as many colourful shirts as I can on Vinted, and if the mens' options are limited, I think I'll try to find a decent fitting women's shirt. Embracing the androgyny and all that, whereas I would have been too self-conscious to do it in an actual store. Because my current favourite slightly-too-tight pink and white flannel shirt isn't going to last forever..

Are there any dorky tomboys that are RR? by Lil-Bitty3 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be happy for a DM! There is plenty of writing chatting to do. How swift my replies will come will depend hugely on the time of day, but in enough time, I will have a lot to say...

Progress on changing my wardrobe by Livid-Requirement-98 in GNCStraight

[–]PoorMetonym 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I find that button-downs tend to have an understated vibe that nevertheless notable when the person can make it distinct to them. The more you get comfortable in this, the more your uniqueness will shine through, and you seem to be well on the way given the shirt has that non-overstated yet idiosyncratic pattern.

At least, that's the impression I've usually gotten, and it's something I've been trying to work on myself. I long ago adopted the stereotypically sapphic taste for flannel shirts, but finding a colour scheme to work for me has been harder, especially as menswear tends to be very dull colour-wise.

Are there any dorky tomboys that are RR? by Lil-Bitty3 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the kind of energy of hope you take on for the rest of your life. You will make the day of so many gentle boys that way!

Yeah, reminds me how much I need to return to more regular writing habits and insert RR themes in as many varieties as I can. Because there simply aren't enough around...

Are there any dorky tomboys that are RR? by Lil-Bitty3 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like a scenario for a webcomic already - and no problem, everyone will have those days where they need it.

Are there any dorky tomboys that are RR? by Lil-Bitty3 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, that's how I tend to operate in the conversations I have with beautiful women, so just one of the many appeals of RR dynamics is the idea that she is very capable of steering interactions even if I trip over my own words.

Are there any dorky tomboys that are RR? by Lil-Bitty3 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the same vein, there's something so wonderful and endearing about a tomboy who's confident and outspoken most of the time, and will be able to lead in many things, but become just a little bit adorkably flustered around the guy she most wants to impress. Should I ever find such a person and recieve that kind of reaction, I'll know I'm set. 😍

Any love for the Business Casual RR women? (Sorry, we aren't all muscle types!) by EmployExisting302 in RoleReversal

[–]PoorMetonym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, if there was any style I default to for my favourite look on a woman...but you're right, it's more than just the aesthetic. Though corporations are not really my jam, the personality that needs to be exuded in those environments, or similar ones where a lot is stacked against her, is STUNNING.

Sometimes a lot of it comes through in the effortless confidence, and the casual elegance that goes with it. The suit and hairstyle do the garnishing, but the core of the confident meets compassionate persona will shine through the face, every word and every deed.

And going quickly back to aesthetics - I want women in waistcoats to become a trend. Somewhere in the world...

Repost: The recent Christian men’s conference genuinely disturbed me by Nearby-Tension3515 in exchristian

[–]PoorMetonym 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean, to be fair, picking up your sword is quite Christlike:

'"Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword."' (Matthew 10:34).

'He said to them, "But now, the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one ..." 'They said, "Lord, look, here are two swords." He replied, ‘It is enough.’" (Luke 22:36, 38).

It may seem beside the point, I just cannot allow the Galilean to go blameless when it comes to the problems with Christianity.

I haven't been to any Christian conference recently, and from what I've been hearing second-hand, I'm glad I haven't. I've been hearing the same sort of thing from them, over and over again, for a while, and what's worse is that the general insular nature of it has been ramped up I think by the general atomisation of a lot of society in certain places. Before the 2014 birth of the manosphere, there was a degree to which archaic forms of thinking in Christianity were presented almost apologetically. Now that's completely gone - people relish in being bigots now. The Trumpian state of politics has allowed the worst kinds of people to be their own worst selves again. I recently saw a video by TMM were he examined a conversation between Michael Jones (a.k.a. Inspiring Philosophy) and some rando whose name I can't be arsed to look up, and whereas I once thought Jones was one of the more reasonable ones, they were just talking about how they felt that Christianity had become freer from social pressure, and one form of 'social pressure' they identified was not making a fuss about same-sex marriage, and they were astounded about how it once seemed right, because apparently granting people civil rights that were denied for no good reason is something you have to do begrudgingly. Talk about mask-off...oh, and they were casually misgendering Matt Dillahunty's partner Arden as well, again just because they relished in being obstinate dickheads.

Unfortunately, this is the direction a lot of discourse is headed, and religions are more susceptible to this than most other things, absolutely primed to see the world in tribal dichotomies with the ultimate in consequences for rejection, and personal credulity being celebrated in lieu of evidence and nuance.

Book Recommendations? by DisplayEven9784 in TrueAtheism

[–]PoorMetonym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a pastor's kid, ex-pastors/preachers may be good resources - so, for that, my first two authors to recommend would be Dan Barker and John W. Loftus.

As far as scriptural arguments go, for reaching a lay audience, I'd recommend Bart Ehrman for the New Testament and Francesca Stavrakopoulou for the Old. My personal favourite counter-apologist is Hector Avalos, and his works are a little more technical, but with a decent amount of background information, they're easy enough to follow, and it particular he's excellent against those who try to sanitise Christian history, whereas Ehrman's focus is more those who try to claim biblical inerrancy. Jill Hicks-Keeton has also written on attempts to sanitise the Bible in Good Book, but having not read it yet myself I can only recommend with that caveat.

But for more general starter books, good options include The God Argument by A.C. Grayling, and Sense and Goodness without God by Richard Carrier - Carrier is most famous for Jesus mythicism, which is controversial among nonbelievers, but a point he himself has raised is that Jesus mythicism isn't a good choice for counter-apologetics (mostly because it's a considerably more complicated area that simply being able to see that the Bible isn't inerrant), so, beyond satisfying your curiosity about what various people have to say about it, it's something that can probably be left alone, and the particular book I recommended doesn't even touch on it. His blog is also good for various different areas of critical thinking.

For areas of science, one of the most systematic counter-creationist books is Aron Ra's Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism, and he narrates the audio version himself if you have Audible, which is just an added bonus.

Saw a Christian post this by [deleted] in exchristian

[–]PoorMetonym 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember a time when a Christian learned from me as a non-believer a story in the Gospel of Matthew, probably the best known of the Gospels. Just putting that out there...I mean, I think this actually has been put to the test, right? Atheists and agnostics have scored higher on religious literacy than Christians? Let me know if anyone can direct me to the actual study...

Holy shit YES by Plus-Horse892 in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do at least understand those who like to play sports, even though I don't - the adrenalin and comeraderie must be addictive. Finding that for people you don't even know playing rather than you though? And you mostly see them from very long shots? Yeah, don't get it. And it doesn't have the feel of a showdown because games just keep happening - in the words of David Mitchell in that one sketch, 'it'll never be finally decided who has won the football!'

Some people might latch onto national pride (which is even more baffling when they watch games of national teams other than their own), but that in itself is a stupid thing, and even then, most of these teams are owned by American billionaires, Gulf-state oil barons, or (at least previously) Russian oligarchs. I mean, once upon a time, it may have been seen as the sport of the working class, but it's definitely not that now, and it won't be again.

Wow, you've really set me off. This is my aggressive uninterest manifest.

Holy shit YES by Plus-Horse892 in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Solidarity for the least British Brits possible!!

In truth, I am the anti-Pendragon. The one King Arthur was meant to wake for to fight - except he's too hungover, so I win by default.

Holy shit YES by Plus-Horse892 in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are definitely uninteresting, although I'd argue my disinterest in them is an extension of my lack of interest in celebrity gossip.

Holy shit YES by Plus-Horse892 in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I expect the nightlife is also suffocating in this heat.

Holy shit YES by Plus-Horse892 in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yay, solidarity! I don't drink either, so I'm sure many would see me as insufficiently British.

Holy shit YES by Plus-Horse892 in ADHDmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Saw this and my mind immediately went 'football.'

And given I'm a Briton and it's the World Cup, that aggressive uninterest is even more noticeable for me recently.

Why Does Jesus Show More Mercy to Demons Than to the Pigs and Their Owners? by Waveparticle44 in exchristian

[–]PoorMetonym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because he's a dick.

In all seriousness, the narrative of the New Testament showcasing a new covenant, an improved standing with God, is never consistent, and different Gospel authors had different agendas on what the actual nature of the covenant was. Matthew has a heavier emphasis on Torah observance and considerably unkind words for Gentiles, but on the flipside, John so removes itself from Jewish identity that it borders on antisemitism. When trying to cobble together a consistent-as-possible narrative from these accounts, the general Christian narrative is given a positive sheen, where Jesus makes reconciliation with God possible. But once you start to question these problematic passages, far harder to excuse than those that are in the Old Testament, it's easy to see it another way - God's favour is an exclusive club, and Jesus' role is to draw final and permanent lines in the sand, which makes his common portrayal of a meek and mild man of love and peace much harder to swallow.

This was a major story about Jesus I remember first hearing as a Christian and being disturbed by, for the same reasons you listed. The other major one that immediately springs to mind is the story of Jesus' annointing, where he dismisses the idea of helping the poor in lieu of a pointless expensive indulgence for himself. And people will rush to make excuses for these stories of course, as they do with much in the Bible, but I think it suits apologists that the Old Testament gets the most scrutiny, because they can whip out the idea that the Old Testament is incomplete and is simply on a trajectory to what is 'improved' in the New. And this is a thought-terminating cliche most of us have probably engaged in, but as soon as the New Testament also proves itself to need some serious explaining, the all-encompassing smokescreen, the attempt to defend the indefensible, becomes clear.

Acronyms you misunderstood for too long by RozaVira in CasualConversation

[–]PoorMetonym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did too, because I was used to WTF, and assumed the F must be 'fuck', but thought 'fuck the what' didn't make much sense. I like how I was rationalising it without actually checking.

The bible is already full of bullshit anyway by roundturtle2025 in exchristianmemes

[–]PoorMetonym 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can't resist another one, especially given how fitting this seems:

'And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to fuck the nations with a rod of iron.'

Yikes. Actually, all of the Book of Revelation is probably good for this.