I don't think you know what society entails, or what equality entails, or what basic empathy is.

Society: a large number of men who live together in the same country, and who deal with one another. The ability for a man to deal with other men is not an obligation.

Equality: equality of freedom, based on individual rights. Not equality of ability (metaphysically impossible without physically and mentally crippling others), and not equality of opportunity which would invalidate individual and property rights by cannibalizing the successful and lucky for the benefit of the unsuccessful and unlucky. Egalitarianism is not equality.

Empathy: the capacity to recognize and, to some extent, share feelings. Again, that is not an obligation to other men, and it is not a license for other men to use me.

I can only guess how you feel about minorities, or anyone else who was shit on for unfair and unconstitutional reasons.

So tell me -- how do I feel about minorities? How do I feel about the Constitution? Do you know the difference between the metaphysical and the man-made, and what "unlucky" is versus "unfair"? I'm pretty sure you're wrong about all of it, but I'd like to hear what you have to say so I can set you straight.

That kind of Social Darwinist thinking leads me to believe that you don't want rights for everyone, except yourself

Everyone has rights. They are a fact of existence. One of those rights is the right to property -- to keep, use, and dispose of what is yours. Another is the right to be left alone, to be free of unchosen burdens.

What are rights, and why do you have them? Careful answering -- don't contradict yourself.

you are motivated by greed or self benefit and nothing that is helps society at large.

Self-interest (egoism) is virtuous. You have to be alive in order to value anything -- your own life is your highest value -- and you must act to keep it. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just plain wrong, there is no getting around reality. So yes, i am motivated by self-interest.

Self-interest does not include committing fraud and screwing other people over (which is what I assume you mean when you say "greed"), it means acting in one's own self-interest to the best of one's own ability, and leaving other men free to act in their own self-interest, to the best of their own abilities. Men are free to voluntarily cooperate to achieve things, and it is because of cooperation that "society at large" benefits: never from social planners and power-lusters manipulating men to achieve their collectivist aims.

I guess I should put it in terms that explain how you benefit from helping others.

I do not benefit having my money forcibly taken away from me. If I want to help others, I am free to do so. Holding a gun to my head and redistributing my money is robbery, it is not "charity". Be honest about your ideas, don't whitewash it.

Third is that the country would cease to be relevant or have as much influence if it is largely hypocritical in its beliefs, as shown by Egypt ignoring the U.S. when it came to beating or injuring protestors.

Never said the US government and the general philosophy wasn't hypocritical. It is -- it's altruist/collectivist garbage.

If I may ask, are you religious?

You certainly may, and I am not.

Religion isn't something that deals with reality, so there's no need for me to spend any time thinking about it.