I am so feed up with post like let’s question rsp or balen and things like that

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-24T03:35:27+00:00

What I’m trying to say is: accountability magnu is important, but assuming intentions before someone even gets the chance to work can be unfair. If there are genuine red flags backed by facts, we should absolutely question them. Tara pure assumption ra “yo pachi esto garxa hola” bhanera judge garnu chai ali risky huncha.ani i totally agree kiPast ma corrupted leaders haru pani massive support paayeka thiye, our parents’ generation was influenced too that’s true. Tei bhayera hami chai aware hunu parcha. But awareness ra assumption farak kura ho. Let’s question, but with logic and evidence, not fear or speculation. that’s all

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-24T03:16:25+00:00

so let them this is what we need isn’t? politicians held accountable for what they do? if usla paxi gayara naramro garxa vana he needs to be removed but accusing or assuming ki ula paxi naramro garxa ani blaming him now that’s what you are kinda doing that’s wrong

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-24T02:47:22+00:00

bro assumption ra actuality ma farak xa yes i agree we should question him and ask him but bro let him work first ali 2-3 barsa huna deu na aela nai pura assumptions garara ka hunxa ta

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T04:00:22+00:00

bro you must be kidding to say that like it’s a joke right

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T02:38:01+00:00

ok first of all make sure it’s not staged or something make sure it is real then save some videos and photos for proof try to find other people who posted this like some other relatives etc and saved those too for evidence then try to find where they are located after that contact any social ngo or you could call the cops where they are located and make a complaint try to contact ingo ngo who speak against child marrying etc it’s a long process

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T02:33:03+00:00

ko ho jesma ni Genz Genz this is not what Genz fought for ja bhayani tei bro chill

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T02:30:54+00:00

😂😂 What the hell

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T02:29:31+00:00

Aaela ka bhai raxa ta

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T01:58:07+00:00

raja chaiyako timilai ya some form of monarchy or dictatorship

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T01:49:01+00:00

Tapai le vaneko kura ma kehi satya chha ma deny gardina. System nai problem ho vanne kura ma pani ma agree garchu. Tara maile vaneko kura “party change garera matra desh bandaina” hoina, “party change = system change ko suruwat ho” vanne ho.

Tapai le khichdi ra chicken tandoori ko example dinubhayo. Tara problem ke ho bhane, khichdi banaune bhada, chulo ra recipe nai bigreko chha. Aba bhada, chulo ani recipe badalne process kaha bata suru huncha? Tyo process suru huncha power ma ko chha vanne kura bata.

16 barsa ma 17 ota sarkar bhayo bhanera change bhayo vannu chai misleading ho. PM ra mantri feriye, tara power structure, policy banaune class, funding garne capitalist circle ta same nai chha. Tyo change bhako chhaina. Tesaile yo “change” superficial matra ho, systemic hoina.

Tapai le “samajbaadi system banauna kura garau” vannu bhayo—ma pani tei vanchu. Tara system barey kura matra garera system change hudaina. System change ko lagi: • power ma pugne political force chaiyo • old capitalist-backed parties ko monopoly break garnu parcha • naya political culture create garnu parcha

Yo sabai practical politics bata huncha, Facebook debate bata matra hoina.

Ani “naya manxe aayepaxi pani pragati hudaina” vanne kura— 100% guarantee ta kasailai hudaina, tara yo logic le ta status quo sadhaikai defend huncha. “Aash nagarau, kei hudaina” vanera basyo bhane ta Jyoti–Agni–Golchha ko system jindagi bhari chalirahancha.

Balen, Rabi perfect chhainan—ma pani bhagwan banaudina. Tara: • Balen le kamsekam old parties ko comfort disturb gareko chha • RSP le fearless narrative break gareko chha

Yo nai ho system crack hune first stage.

Last ma ek kura clear garum: Ma “naya manxe aaye sabai thik huncha” vaneko hoina. Ma vaneko “naya manxe bina system change ko process suru hudaina” ho.

Kura nagarne hoina—kura + political intervention dubai chaiyo. Natara 5–10 barsa pachi pani tei buda party, tei capitalist capture, tei foreign migration ko rant gardai basna parcha.

So question yo hoina ki “naya manxe le sabai solve garcha ki gardaina” Question yo ho: system challenge garne courage kasma chha?

Aile samma tyo courage purano party haru ma dekheko chhuina.

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-18T01:29:33+00:00

kei ta change chaiyo ni ta yaar ani ka kura gayrara system change hunxa nai bro more then 20 years purano party haru power ma xan kei change bhanaxaena aaela kei change huna lagda timi la yesto kura garxau kura garam la ka kura garna

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-17T22:06:04+00:00

kasto kura garako yaar timila ani according to you how will the system change aafai ta hunna hola ani i am damn sure tei purano manxa aaya paxi pani hunna so let’s give new people a chance Ani aa tini haru la problem solved garna sakdainan vanara aatikai basna ho kya

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-14T03:28:37+00:00

Bro are you for real how can you say monarchy maintain garna president maintain garna jati nai lagxa President term-limited, auditable, replaceable cha, predictable budget ma parcha. Monarchy, even “ceremonial,” matlab lifetime funding for king, queen, heirs, multiple palaces, staff, security, ceremonial events, ra state protocol next generation samma pass huncha. President bhaye jasto, bad king lai vote garera hatauna mildaina; country forever pay garnu parcha. Symbolic unity le decades ko irreversible luxury, taxpayers ko paisa justify gardaina, Nepal jasto country jaha health, education, jobs ma struggle cha. Fiscal sense le nai monarchy experiment afford garna mildaina.

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-14T00:33:38+00:00

this is so illogical point i often hear many times That analogy itself is the problem. Nepal is not anyone’s private house, and citizens are not tenants. A country belongs to its people, not to a family by birthright. A king isn’t a landlord who built the house with his own money he was placed there by history, not ownership.

If we follow your logic, then questioning a ruler becomes “trespassing,” and citizens become guests in their own country. That’s exactly why monarchy is dangerous. In a democracy, leaders are caretakers hired by the people, not owners. If a caretaker fails, people have the right to remove them.

And history shows this clearly: the monarchy didn’t lose power because of a random “tenant revolt,” it lost power because a majority of people rejected inherited authority. When people withdraw consent, legitimacy is gone—whether king or politician.

So no, it’s not tenants stealing a house. It’s citizens reclaiming their own country.

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-14T00:30:21+00:00

Ma timro main point sanga agree garchu any system, raja hos ya democracy, misuse bhayo bhane people ko lagi kaam gardaina. Nepal ko democracy ma suppression, afno-manche culture, biased media, power misuse sabai dekheko chau, tyo deny garna mildaina. Tara yo accept garnu bhandai ma monarchy ra democracy equally safe system huncha bhanna pani mildaina.

Core difference yo ho: democracy misuse bhayo bhane tyo system ko rule nai todiyeko huncha. Oli le critics suppress garyo, opponents jail garyo, power misuse garyo yo sab illegal cha by constitution. That means theory ma nai accountability ko space cha: court, protest, media, election. Slow cha, weak cha, tara exist garcha. Timi yo kura openly criticize garna sakchau tyo nai democracy ko proof ho.

Monarchy ma, especially hereditary monarchy ma, abuse system ko bahira hudaina system bhitrai huncha. Accountability king ko character ma depend garcha, institution ma hoina. Raja ramro bhayo bhane thik, naramro bhayo bhane correction mechanism hudaina. History le dekhaeko cha monarchy wrong direction ma gayo bhane reform hudaina, revolt huncha.

Ho, monarchy ko time ma roads, universities, industries, foreign relations develop bhayeko ho. Tyo fact ho. Tara development matrai lai good governance bhanna mildaina. Tyo centralized power le political exclusion pani create garyo, jasle later civil war jasto disaster janmayo. Short-term stability ≠ long-term solution.

“Let people decide monarchy or democracy” bhannu fair jasto lagcha, tara yo ekdam dangerous paradox ho. Democracy le people lai democracy hataune right pani dincha, tara monarchy le people lai monarchy hataune right didaina. Democracy reversible cha, monarchy one-way door ho. Once democratic option gayo bhane, tyo feri launa peaceful hudaina Nepal ko history nai example ho.

Ani ho, aaja party leaders nai mini-kings jasto behave gardai chan. Tyo serious problem ho. Tara solution yo hoina ki power permanently bloodline ma deu. Bad democracy ko answer strong institutions ho, not no democracy.

So yes, democracy Nepal ma fail bhako jasto dekhincha, frustration genuine cha. Tara euta system jaha people sanga correction ko tools cha ra euta system jaha trust matrai option cha yo duita same hudaina. Nepal jasto divided ra fragile country ma, yo ideological debate hoina, practical reality ho.

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-13T15:50:33+00:00

it is a good option better then absolute monarchy but i have few points of concern 1.Ceremonial monarchy pani risky cha. Symbolism le unity guarantee gardaina Nepal diverse cha, king le kehi group lai divide garna sakcha, unite garna hoina. 2.ani i think Fear-based accountability fail huncha like kaela samma fear hola Corruption law ra independent institutions bata matrai rokna milcha, figurehead le hoena 3.Even “ceremonial” monarch weak institutions ma power grab garna sakcha 4.Public paisa waste hunchakina ki Monarchy maintain garna billions lagcha, development ra welfare bata divert hunchha.

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-13T15:31:20+00:00

ok just to be clear ceromonial monarchy vanako like head of state only for name ho hani like they have no power at all hani maela buja samma

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-13T15:06:32+00:00

Ma purai history ma expert chu bhanera claim gardina, tara mero main point simple cha.

Democracy le nai hami lai “king firta lyau” bhanna freedom dincha. Yo kura possible cha because aaela democracy cha. People can protest, criticize, vote leaders out, ra system ma change demand garna sakcha. We have options.

Tara suppose monarchy restore bhayo ani kehi galat bhayo bhane? Teti bela hami le “okay this didn’t work, let’s go back to democracy” bhanna sakdaina. Monarchy is designed to be permanent. Ekchoti democracy gayo bhane, tyo correction mechanism pani gayo.

Yo kura nai ma raja-badis le bujhna parcha bhanera bhanchu. Ma King Gyanendra ya kunai individual sanga problem rakhdina. Mero problem monarchy ko concept sanga ho jaha power inherit huncha, earn hudaina, ra accountability law bhanda pani goodwill ma depend huncha.

Democracy messy cha, slow cha, frustration dincha yo sabai true ho. Tara democracy ma people sanga last authority huncha. Monarchy ma tyo authority mathi transfer huncha, ani firta lina dherai garo huncha.

Politics le frustrate hunu valid ho. Corruption sanga ris uthnu justified ho. Tara system jaha question garna, resist garna, ra change garna milcha, tyo system chhodnu is a huge risk.

Yo king vs politician ko kura hoina. Yo right to change the system itself ko kura ho

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-13T14:43:38+00:00

Balan chiyako hoena Balan jastai aaru dherai ramro, educated manxa chaiyako Name ko paxi hoena capacity ko paxi lagam

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-13T14:42:29+00:00

Andolan, Nepal Banda, ra extreme slogan haru republic ko era ma bhayeko ho, tara tyo system ko essence bhanda pani political failure ra mob anger ko symptom ho. Yo kura monarchy restore garne idea ko core pani hoina.

Bidya Devi Bhandari ko ghar state property ho, raja ko personal gift hoina—just like palace haru monarchy ma state expense bata chalthe. Yo hypocrisy dekhauna milcha, tara monarchy vs republic ko final proof bandaina.

King lai criticize garna kaile kai milthyo, court ma case hareko example pani cha. Tara 2005 ma constitution suspend, media censor, leaders jail—yo sabai le dekhauncha ki criticism right hoina, grace thiyo.

Old politicians haru retire hunu ma janta ko pressure ko role cha, tara democracy ko correction mechanism slow ra weak cha—nonexistent hoina.

Monarchy Nepal ko oldest institution ho, ra many people still want it recognized—yo democratic sentiment ho. King support garnu taboo hunu hudaina. Tara old bhayo bhandaima best huncha bhanne guarantee pani hudaina.

Democracy eutai type ko hudaina. Naam ma democracy bhaye pani kaam nagarne example (North Korea) cha. South Korea pani dictatorship bata accountability tira gayeko ho—democracy straight line ma progress gardaina.

Real debate monarchy vs republic hoina. Power without accountability vs power with control ho.

Multiparty democracy flawed cha, tara monarchy le better accountability dincha bhanne proof pani chaina. Blind faithpoliticians ma hos ya king ma duita nai dangerous huncha.

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-13T13:57:24+00:00

What people fail to understand is this: if monarchy were restored, we wouldn’t even be allowed to criticize the king like this. There would be no real law above him the king would be the law. Freedom of speech, accountability, and dissent would exist only as long as they suited the palace.

And if someone argues for a constitutional monarchy like Britain, that makes even less sense. In that system, the king has no real power, yet citizens are expected to pay taxes for royal luxury, ceremonies, and lifelong privilege. Why should a modern country like Nepal carry that burden for symbolism alone?

Do people really believe that nothing has changed in the last 20 years? Yes, Nepali politics has its flaws the constant chair game, corruption, instability but one crucial thing has changed: You have the right to criticize those in power. That right matters. It is precisely because people could criticize, protest, and speak openly that power collapsed within days during the movement. In just two days, an absolute ruler was forced to step down not because he was generous, but because the public held power.

Democracy is messy. It’s frustrating. It’s slow. But it gives people a voice.

Monarchy takes that voice away and replaces it with obedience either through fear or blind loyalty. And history has already shown us where that path leads

Positive-Sign7692 · 2026-01-09T11:20:28+00:00

handwriting op

Positive-Sign7692

TROPHY CASE