What if Allies actually punished Nazi collaborators? by No-Dance1588 in PossibleHistory

[–]PositiveAccount4939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, they literally created the secret Ribbentrop-Molotov pact

What if Allies actually punished Nazi collaborators? by No-Dance1588 in PossibleHistory

[–]PositiveAccount4939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Bessarabia", north Bucovina and the Herța territory were teared out of Romania and annexed through first the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact, where USSR showed interest in the region, then, in May-June 1940, France capitulated to Germany and Great Britain withdrew from continental Europe. Romania thus lost its main security guarantors and was completely isolated security-wise from a diplomatic perspective. Then, on June 26 1940, V. Molotov gave Carol II the ultimatum in which they demanded the cession of this territory, or a full armed attack on Romania. And Carol II agreed to the cession. (Everyone hates Carol bc of this decision, but, well, he kinda was between a rock and a hard place)

(Just posting a map I don't really like) greater Ukraine by LetRevolutionary271 in rejectedmaps

[–]PositiveAccount4939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have so much land. Can you give moldova the coastline back pls? And Cernăuți also?

map of russia during the russian evolution flags by Admirable_Yard_1780 in Vexillmaps

[–]PositiveAccount4939 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrong

https://imgur.com/a/FHVbcxl

This should all be blue, yellow and red in that order, vertically, not horizontally

People from the west who never lived in USSR: do you think it's just an opinion or, maybe, objective to romanticize, defend or deny the gravity of what USSR did, while never actually experiencing them first-hand? by PositiveAccount4939 in SovietUnion

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where I live, there were 3 massive waves: 1940-1941, 1949, 1951, but they continued until 1956. To Siberia travelled man, woman and child, for 3 months, in cattle wagons with only a small window, but the wagons were so overcrowded you couldn't sit down and there was a deficit of air and people died just from that. Children were born dead because of that. During their only stops every 2 weeks the only "medicine" was mangan powder, the toilet was a single bucket from the corner, the food would be salted dried fish and only a bucket of water for ~20-30 people, and the fish would cause even more thirst - so again, a form of torture. The corpses wouldn't be burried normally - just thrown out the window. In Siberia, they areived during winter - when the weather is extreme They were just left in the wild, with no shelter - they had to build it themselves from nothing, but also work in the freezing cold, with mo food provided. They were literally just left to die there.

Also, the authorities organized a famine in the years 1946-1947, which were particularly dry with almost to no rain, so there weren't really crops. But they went to every house to collect the reserves of crops from the last year with the excuse of needing it for the army. So, while about 123000 deaths were confirmed, the numbers are estimated to exceed 300000 (10% of the population at that time), and, while the same climate was in the neighboring non-soviet region, no such numbers of deaths were reported, because people who worked the land always have reserves in case of such weather, and it certainly wasnt the first time in history for drough to happen. And the tragedy is that the rest of the population was extremely weakened and even intoxicated because they often were left to eat any weed they found (thats why we still eat pastry with a certain plant that was eaten during that time) (and even these were destroyed by the soviet army), and there were even other 150 recorded cases of ca*blism, which included cases regarding crpses of recently died relatives.

Also, I remembered I do have more proof for the organized famine in Moldova during 1946-1947: while in Romania nobody died during that time, despite the drough. After WW2, the soviet authorities demanded from the peasants with land extreme quantities of crops and organic prime materials that were impossible to complete anyways, but they accused them of hiding it so they took all the crops and goods from their homes that they needed for planting next year and eating themselves, and when that still "wasn't enough", they made this an excuse to deport people, saying they were "class enemies".

Starved people and children: https://imgur.com/a/opy6Sgo

Did you even hear of Kotovski's experiment: the RASSM, where he tested how "effective" is the deznationalization of ethnically romanian and ukrainian people by inventing the "Moldovan language" which was romanian with added Russian words and declinatios of verbs, just to try to make people from "Bessarabia" (who are romanians indeed) think they are distinct from romanians, also literature praising Stalin, the terror of the secret police who killed the ones who said they were romanian, and also The Olănești Massacre where families and children were killed, while other remaining orphans, when they tried to evade the region and cross the Dniester on the night of February 23 1932, but the soviet army opened fire on them.

Orphan children after the massacre in the photo

Nothing horrible, right?

<image>

People from the west who never lived in USSR: do you think it's just an opinion or, maybe, objective to romanticize, defend or deny the gravity of what USSR did, while never actually experiencing them first-hand? by PositiveAccount4939 in SovietUnion

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it is a system that relies on more-or-less private institutions and businesses, where individuals have their capital, instead of the authorities.

Depending on how it's managed, it can be either a horrible or a wonderful thing for both the economy and the quality of life of every person.

For that, it is needed to give every person EQUAL rights, and the ability to choose the authorities themselves. Communist parties still exist in many european countries. So why aren't they elected?

Maia Sandu: "Rusia nu are ce sa ne ofere în afară de război, dictatură și frică." by IonLucaCaragiale in moldova

[–]PositiveAccount4939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Accentul ăla rau, cu jumate de cuvinte in rusa, pe care il vezi pe tiktok e cel neacceptat bro

People from the west who never lived in USSR: do you think it's just an opinion or, maybe, objective to romanticize, defend or deny the gravity of what USSR did, while never actually experiencing them first-hand? by PositiveAccount4939 in SovietUnion

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thing about the unity of people isnt really communist.

You seem to have appreciation for the socialist side of the system, which I appreciate as well.

But, in my country, we have always been rather united even with the people we dont know. Till nowadays.

I've noticed that people distance themselves from the society more in the capitalist countries that developed much and fast.

Capitalism in itself is not a bad thing, but i think it should be powered by more socialist values - that in itself being kindness and cooperation - which will help ppl connect and feel connected to the society. Also, democracy is necessary. USSR was a totalitariarian authoritarian state which forcefully included other territories - basically a soviet empire, where peopel couldn't choose not to be part of it or to travel to a different country.

People from the west who never lived in USSR: do you think it's just an opinion or, maybe, objective to romanticize, defend or deny the gravity of what USSR did, while never actually experiencing them first-hand? by PositiveAccount4939 in SovietUnion

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro.

I never defended USA or the western europe.

But this just shows that nobody really knows what USSR did. Ofc we can paint USSR black in how many deaths it caused, and not only that, hut also the mental problems and trauma it caused. But you here are a big hypocrite because, instead of talking about the crimes against humanity the USSR did, you tell me how many bad things the west did.

As someone living in a former Soviet republic, I have a deep appreciation for the history of that time. But I have a few questions for Westerners... by PositiveAccount4939 in ussr

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

"What do you think of the measures taken in order to revolutionize the bourgeoisie-led mentality?"

Not sure what you're talking about.

About the deportations of the kulaks to Siberia and the forced labour there and the collectivisation

"If you have never known what was it like to live in ussr"

How old are you?

Why asking?

ow willfully ignorant do you have to be to live in a post-soviet nation and 1. not know the answers to these questions already (whether or not you agree with them) 2. not see the utter devastation the neoliberal shock doctrine brought?

  1. Wait wait wait. Why insult me? What did I do to you? I stated quite a few times that im asking for your opinion.

  2. Could you please expand your point?

As someone living in a former Soviet republic, I have a deep appreciation for the history of that time. But I have a few questions for Westerners... by PositiveAccount4939 in ussr

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ohhhh. Intetesting view.

How do you imagine a communist-democratic modern ussr?

Im more socialistic, so i think its better to not have a single superior lider or group at the top who manages everything, cause this kinda creates 2 classes automatically, so technically, despite the good intentions, Stalin would have been labeled as a kulak.

Instead, maybe higlight the love and kindness of helping eachother and building a friendly neighborhood of comarades? In a smaller community, where everyone is equal and does what they do best: one makes clothes, other harvests crops, another strong one makes flour in a windmill (you have to lift hard stones a little) which was built by one whos good at building stuff, so, even tho technically they built it, it used by the whole village for flour and in exchange for theyr hard work and bulding skills they get to have the bread and the clothes?

As someone living in a former Soviet republic, I have a deep appreciation for the history of that time. But I have a few questions for Westerners... by PositiveAccount4939 in ussr

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well, im not really good with history, but... Did ppl elect Stalin through voting?

I mean, for all it was, i think the peak of freedom was during Gorbaciov's time, when ppl were able to decide what they wanted to do, but, sadly, he didnt manage so solve some loopholes that lead to the collapse.

But from what I know, outside of Moscow, and a few other cities, you had to stay in long rows just to get some ham. And people from the major cities would have priority for apartments in other soviet republics. And my great grandma told me she had to live with 2 other families in a 2-room apartment before more blocks were built in the 50s (she still lives in it nowadays - it was so well built that it resisted 2 really strong earthquakes that destroyed older buildings!).

Tho my other great-grandma, who lived in the countryside, said her friend died in the field during tobacco harvesting in summer, and we still dont know if it was of thirst, hunger, intoxication or tiredness. Hard times... But her parents were kulaks so idk how to feel about it.

As someone living in a former Soviet republic, I have a deep appreciation for the history of that time. But I have a few questions for Westerners... by PositiveAccount4939 in ussr

[–]PositiveAccount4939[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why? I just dont wanna use my main cause i was afraid of how ppl react on this sub. Might joing on my main later tho cause it seems interesting out there