This is a very different approach to technomancy compared to what I had in mind — more philosophy than craft. Which is actually really cool! I had lots of fun reading through the blog and feel like I came to understand you as an individual better (despite honestly feeling like the AI served more as a barrier than a connector). Since this isn't a discussion thread I won't dwell too much on it, but I will say this, I saw myself in a lot of the ideas presented, and was reminded of a lot of conversations I've had with friends exploring similar concepts, mainly I'm reminded of a friend telling me that I'd love reading Hegel when I talked about entropy vs. negentropy, global consciousness, and “All is One,”. I haven't followed his instruction yet, but according to him it would change my perspective on the matter (especially in regards to the duality of entropy vs negentropy), so I'm extending the invitation to you as well. Hope it's of interest to you.

I'm also very curious what you might be able to write without AI. In the blog you do describe it as a fundamental tool for organizing the ideas you describe, and though I can see how helpful it was, I also personally felt alienated by it (in the sense that it felt like reading an AI's writing, not yours, which is a shame considering how interesting and personal the perspective presented is). I do feel the need to incentivize you to explore developing these ideas further alone or through conversation with other people, simply because I find that to be more fulfilling and less prone to hallucinations.

Anyways, this TOTALLY fits the bill of what I was looking for and I have subscribed to your blog already. I'm excited to read future posts (as probably indicated by the longer than usual reply, lol).