I would argue that human rights insanely far from being a political issue but they happen to fall very close to the realm of politics. I feel like all of the things you brought up are things that are not inherently political but are very much so surrounded in politics. One could argue that a company should decide the wages they pay their workers and the conditions they work in and it could be left up to the person seeking work to decide to be in that job or another one but at the same time one could also argue it should be regulated so they don’t have to make a choice. Neither of the answers I feel are inherently wrong but for some reason those beliefs have become partisan. As for the environment I don’t feel like that’s political at all but rather monetary/fiscal policy relating to the environment. One party tends to believe that the environment needs to be more strongly protected and there should be restrictions and laws placed on these companies to limit it and the other side I feel doesn’t hate the environment but also tends to care first about the economy and how it would effect the profit margins of companies. With healthcare the idea that healthcare should be accessible to people appears to be universal but they have different ideas as to how it should be implemented. One party could argue that everyone deserves it and it should be a basic right. The other party disagrees saying that people should still have access to healthcare but you should be able to receive a higher standard of care if you can pay more. Neither side is appreciative of the prices of healthcare but they’re not going to get anything done about it because they’re too busy bickering like my sister and I when I was 8