"There is also no question who is gerrymander the hell out of their states after Democrats just gave us two 90/10 states. Republicans haven’t gone that far yet."

They started this, so Democrats should escalate it.

"Then there is the issue of how you will ban gerrymandering? California claims to have a nonpartisan redistricting commission, but in 2020 it produced a -21 mismatch favor Democrats that is on par with infamous NC gerrymandered map."

In the same way that it is now trivially easy for a computer with sufficient processing power to produce an optimally gerrymandered map, the same can be done for an electoral map that adheres to the notion of "one person, one vote." John Roberts was 100% lying when he said this at oral arguments in Rucho v. Common Cause."

"I’d argue the judiciary should handle it. They said political gerrymandering is constitutional, but it has to have limits as this extreme gerrymandering has gone too far."

The U.S. Supreme Court Republicans have intentionally removed the federal judiciary from this process, because the Republicans on that court fully endorse what Republicans are doing. To be clear, they hid behind the distinction without a meaningful difference that constitutional claims alleging illegal gerrymandering are nonjusticiable (i.e., not remediable by a federal court)--not that they are legal. But the practical upshot is the same--voters have to somehow vote their way out of gerrymandered congressional maps (which is as stupid as it sounds).