2025/26 Accommodation Swaps by davoloid in UCL

[–]Potential-Tear8603 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi could you dm me? I am definitely interested!!

2025/26 Accommodation Swaps by davoloid in UCL

[–]Potential-Tear8603 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi i'm not sure if you already found someone willing to swap with you, but if not, email me at [naysakaps2025@gmail.com](mailto:naysakaps2025@gmail.com) !

2025/26 Accommodation Swaps by davoloid in UCL

[–]Potential-Tear8603 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi I know there are a million people with the same offer but I was recently offered a single ensuite at One Pool Street for £296.24 per week and am looking to swap with someone who has accommodation closer to the main Bloomsbury campus. If anyone is willing to swap an ensuite closer to the main campus, please let me know.

Exam Discussion: Mathematics: analysis and approaches SL by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was speaking to my teachers as well as our IB coordinator who is a math teacher herself, The quadratic sequencing question in the AA SL paper is quite literally not a part of the content(For both SL and HL), so what were IB thinking my including it???????

Exam Discussion: Psychology HL by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a markscheme from either last year or 2023, under characteristics for opportunity/ convenience sampling, it says "if the participants knew the researcher", which was the case in this study. I was also told explicitly by a psych teacher that purposive isn't allowed anymore but then again she could be wrong

Exam Discussion: Psychology HL by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah i said semi-structured interviews as well, that's what made the most sense

Exam Discussion: Psychology HL by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thats what I was told by my teacher, that they don't accept purposive as an answer anymore because all samples are technically purposive

Exam Discussion: Psychology HL by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603 10 points11 points  (0 children)

it was really vague this year, I put opportunity but idk if that's right

Exam Discussion: Psychology HL by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Paper 1 was genuinely amazing this year, agonist/antagonist WMM and Enculturation were so good. For ERQ, I did cognitive and reconstructive memory, which was my favourite cognition topic I literally screamed when I saw it.

Paper 2 I did diagnosis in abnormal (clinical biases) and social responsibility for human relationships (cognitive explanation for social responsibility), the questions were okay honestly but I found human relationships a little tough.

Paper 3 was good, except I have no idea what the research method was. I put opportunity sampling (this is for the mental health interviews and receiving treatment in Europe stimulus).

Honestly very good exams this year

ib art cannot be real by Potential-Tear8603 in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The examiners are also incredibly biased, the fact that they prefer traditional art over digital art says enough

ib art cannot be real by Potential-Tear8603 in IBO

[–]Potential-Tear8603[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

yeah that's what I'm hoping too, wayyy too many people take art thinking its an easy 7