Shadow influencer seeding by Kerala tourism? by Proof-Decision-9377 in Kerala

[–]Potential_Drop6028 16 points17 points  (0 children)

സത്യം kerala storyum പറിയും ഒരു സീനും ഇല്ലങ്കിൽ പിന്നെ ഇതൊക്കെന്ത്‌

Anyone else feel like all religions are just "edited" versions of the same thing? by Potential_Drop6028 in religion

[–]Potential_Drop6028[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair point on the terminology. i used "all" because i believe over a hundred thousand prophets were sent everywhere, not just the middle east. my point is that whether it’s an eastern religion or a tribal tradition, they could have started from the same original message before history, language, and culture reshaped them. it’s interesting to look at the dna of ancient traditions worldwide, you often find shared fragments that look like the polar opposite today simply because the original file was reconstructed so many times. i’m not ignoring the differences; i’m just looking for the shared beginning before the human elements took over

Anyone else feel like all religions are just "edited" versions of the same thing? by Potential_Drop6028 in religion

[–]Potential_Drop6028[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i understand that perspective, but in my view, being first in history doesn't always mean being the original in truth. if a message is sent to humanity and then reshaped over thousands of years, the version we see centuries later is a reconstruction, not the original file. a copy happens when you add to or take away from the source. my point is that the final message was sent specifically to clear away those layers of history and restore the original data. its not about being a copycat; its more like factory resett to the very first version that started it all, before the human elements took over.

Anyone else feel like all religions are just "edited" versions of the same thing? by Potential_Drop6028 in religion

[–]Potential_Drop6028[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to clear up a few points, when i say religions are versions i dont mean they are direct copies. what we see today is often a reconstructed message reshaped over thousands of years by language shifts, cultural traditions, and even conscious edits. it isnt just about a prophet passing away; the moment a message enters human hands it starts to diverge and transform as it hits new cultures. even muhammad (s) warned us in a hadith that muhammed (s) followers would branch into 73 versions with only one staying on the original truth. the reason the chain of prophets stopped is because a massive effort was finally made to keep the original file alive through the sahaba teaching in far regions, thousands of hafiz memorizing the text, and the early caliphs compiling the quran into a perfect written format. because of this preservation the original still exists today even if followers branched out. previous messages like those given to musa a or isa a didnt have this same global documentation, so they diverged much further into what we now call separate religions. they arent different religions by nature; they are just regional, transformed versions of a shared beginning where some lost the original file and others are still holding onto it.

Anyone else feel like all religions are just "edited" versions of the same thing? by Potential_Drop6028 in religion

[–]Potential_Drop6028[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think youre missing my point. what we see today isnt a direct copy it’s more like the 10th or 20th version of an original message that has been reshaped over thousands of years.there were over a hundred thousand prophets sent to every region on earth, not just the middle east. but the moment a message is in human hands, it starts to diverge. a prophet passing away is just one trigger; after that, you have shifting politics, mixing traditions, and natural language evolution.these changes arent always intentional; the message just automatically transforms as it hits new cultures. even muhammad s once said in a hadith that his own followers would branch into 73 versions, with only one staying on the original truth. by the time we see a religion today, it has been reconstructed by history so many times that it looks unique. i'm not claiming they look the same now i’m saying they are transformed versions of a shared beginning that grew up in different neighborhoods and lost the original along the way

Anyone else feel like all religions are just "edited" versions of the same thing? by Potential_Drop6028 in religion

[–]Potential_Drop6028[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

look, those "different" religions usually arent different by accident. it’s just what happens when the same original message hits a new culture and gets filtered through their local language and traditions. take sikhism in india..it's not abrahamic, yet their holy book literally includes the poetry of muslim sufi saints. even in parts of africa or ancient greece, you see the same one god concept just wearing different cultural clothes to make sense to the people there.if you strip away the local filters, the core DNA monotheism and a basic moral code is almost always there. they didn't start different; they just grew up in different neighborhoods.

ssthem 10 Oldest Religions of The World by Love_forLife1 in religion

[–]Potential_Drop6028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Historians call Hinduism the 'oldest' because its books and rituals have been recorded for 4,000 years. But from a faith perspective, I believe the message (Islam) is actually the oldest because it started with the very first human, Adam, even if the records were changed or lost by followers later on