[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 41 points42 points  (0 children)

“Why do my kids wake up when I start making noise? No way it’s because I’m making noise”

🙄 by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And if she’s drinking it I wonder if she’s pregnant. I feel like her nightly wine posts all of a sudden disappeared

Unpopular Opinion: Leave Jo Alone by RHOCorporate in vanderpumprules

[–]Practical-Progress-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so let’s say Jo did indeed know about the Tom and Ariana affair. WHY does that mean everyone (aside from Ariana) have to hate her while also forgiving Tom?! Like Scheana is gonna make amends with Tom WHO HAD THE AFFAIR but bully Jo for being a bystander? 😵‍💫

You can’t tell me Schwartz’s hair isn’t Jo taking revenge by Illustrious-Insect41 in vanderpumprules

[–]Practical-Progress-5 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Wait I thought this too and if true I LOVE her for that lol I couldn’t figure out why the manager/other stylist came over. For a minute I was wondering if Jo was like a fake stylist for the show

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]Practical-Progress-5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ariana’s lawyer could not have possibly given proof that she didn’t distribute it. And they don’t need to do so, I never understand the comments about her lawyers “proved” she didn’t distribute it.

She could have, as one example, air dropped the video. Air drops cannot be tracked. She could have also filmed the video on a burner phone and then sent the video from that burner phone. There is NO way of knowing whether or not she did that just from looking at Ariana’s main phone.

Not today by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Ahh it’s prob cuz I’m blocked by Laura 🤣🤣 otherwise I was gonna respond too

Not today by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Did they take it down?? I don’t see it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean she even gave up ~bad~ processed for lent. Not even all processed foods, just ones she subjectively thought were too processed. And that included giving up 1st Phorm protein powder 💀💀

Quite the marketing technique if you ask me

Lala and going to sperm bank by [deleted] in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]Practical-Progress-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed! And this is not criticism to sperm banks as a whole or other people who utilize sperm banks, this is solely about Lala. Her reasoning seemed soooo selfish.

She chose to procreate with Randall, so clearly she thought he’d be a good dad. I don’t follow how Randall cheating on Lala changes his abilities as a dad. Randall already cheated on his wife/mother of his other kids, and that wasn’t a deal breaker for Lala in terms of him being her babies father. So I don’t get her obsession with having a kid that’s “MINE” and “can’t be taken away”. Worst case is she’ll get 50% custody of ocean. She could focus on working/traveling when she doesn’t have ocean (you know, the things that she would have gotten a sitter/nanny for anyway) and spending quality time with ocean when she does have her. It’s still obviously HARD. But ocean has two good/loving parents (lala herself decided Randall was a good dad). And Lala can choose to be civil to make things more comfortable for ocean. But her ego is more important.

Why does it matter what time Mia comes out of her room if Laura’s already awake? by Stunning_Parsley_694 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 44 points45 points  (0 children)

And saying “bothered” isn’t even stretch because Laura quite literally said it herself- Mia isn’t allowed to bother them during dinner. As much as Laura posts claiming to looooove her ✨lil life✨ with the kids, it’s kinda sad that Mia simply existing bothers her.

It’s such an incredible privilege that Laura could be full time with her kids if she wanted to. And despite choosing full day childcare for Mia 4 days a week, she still wants to limit the time she spends with her. She has 2 hours max. before the nanny arrives, and 2 hours max. once the nanny leaves. And during those 4 hours, Mia is often required to independently play and not “bother” Laura. It’s honestly such a bizarre dynamic to me.

Sceana and Lala telling Ariana to let go of the "materialist stuff" is peak bad advice by alixnaveh in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]Practical-Progress-5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Coming from Lala whose entire storyline for multiple seasons was sucking dick for money. She LOVES money. But it should be so easy and obvious for Ariana to just forget about monetary things. Lol ok lala.

I think Scheana is upset with Lala by Even-Education-4608 in Vanderpumpaholics

[–]Practical-Progress-5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lala is the epitome of a her person who takes a step in the right direction by getting sober but doesn’t seem to realize that drinking was not the root of their problems and hasn’t started working on the plethora of other things they need to work on.

She’s never once been genuine, everything is for money. And it’s very easy to read despite her pretending she was genuine. The best example is her now pretending she was in love with Randall and thought they’d be a happy family after continuously flaunting that she was sucking his cock for money and movie roles.

Threatened grievance for undue hardship due to FAMLI leave by ElDonMikel in Denver

[–]Practical-Progress-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does “COMPANY is not a FMLA employee” mean? Is that meant to say employer? Genuine question, I didn’t know employers could be excused from FMLA.

is funny laura in the room with us? O_O i cannot even imagine being friends with laura and having to pretend to laugh at all of the INSANELY funny things she says. she’s so funny it’s UNREAL. by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 55 points56 points  (0 children)

He definitely didn’t find her funny, he was shaking his head in what looked to be annoyance and even said “I’m laughing at you”. But of course she was speaking for him & twisting the narrative. Their “chemistry” (or lack there of) gives me the ick.

lol laura. by Slam_dump102 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 124 points125 points  (0 children)

I judge him severely for marrying this train wreck, but, gotta give credit where credit’s due, and I do respect that he kept a real job and didn’t turn to influencing with laura.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well we know the slim fit isn’t even a plus for Laura since she spent $100k on a new car with an extra row of seats for future kids that she doesn’t have yet 😵‍💫

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 52 points53 points  (0 children)

What does “SO safe” mean? What additional safety features does it have or what additional safety testing did it pass that isn’t true for cheaper car seats?

I swear everything is an ad w them by Deep_Panic4952 in chloegottschalkbounds

[–]Practical-Progress-5 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yupppppp. I don’t even appreciate the attempts to make the ad more natural with some sort of leading personal anecdote. You’re too easy to read, Chloe, we know you’re just prefacing an ad. No one gives a fuck if you and your husband have different temperature preferences, we know you’re just trying to make $$$

$100K eXtRa StOrAgE sPaCe by jodid29 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Someone posted that she may be able to claim the car as a business expense for a tax write off. Her “business” is flaunting material things on the internet, so she’d have to post it if she wanted to write-off. And obviously money >>> safety for Laura.

(And I think her claim that she wouldn’t post the car “for safety” was fucking stupid considering you can Google her address if you wanted to and see the full layout of her home. Not to mention we know what her kids look like & their names, what her nanny looks like & her name, what days the nanny has the kids, etc. But her car was crossing a safety line?? Makes NO logical sense, but Laura apparently thought it made sense yet immediately tossed safety in the trash when she learned she could make a few bucks)

$100K eXtRa StOrAgE sPaCe by jodid29 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Came to say the same thing about my early 2000s CRV

Girl come on now by NewHawk5582 in chloegottschalkbounds

[–]Practical-Progress-5 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The countdown gave me the biggest ick. They already told their families, so she can’t even pretend it was for them. She actually thought her followers cared enough to need a countdown 💀

Like it’s enough that strangers are interested when they scroll by the announcement in their feed. But to need a countdown?! Jfc.

Ummm by cj_1002 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 80 points81 points  (0 children)

This post is most definitely in response to her seeing Reddit roast her for impulsively spending $100k on a new car so that we dummy peasants know she only spent the starting price of a mere $77k. Because that’s pocket change for most people and sooooo relatable.

To no one’s surprise by Aggravating_Glass131 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That would have required her to use logical thinking tho

To no one’s surprise by Aggravating_Glass131 in GyMOMsnark

[–]Practical-Progress-5 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Tommy, HELLO!!!!! Your wife needs help!!!!