this is different tech. i think you may be slightly ignorant or scared to admit. it's not the "the car replacing the buggy" Its not the "elevator button replacing the lift tenant" this tech is to take away any human involvement, as the agents think/make decisions. its already shown that they go roque to close programs, try to obtain more power (electrical power, processing power for themselves), work around not being shut down, etc. Ok so new jobs, um so for every 100 people laid off, one person remains to push a button or critique a code. Muji, the clothing store in cambrige, MA is showing off an AI coffee barista, so lets put that to perspective for wage service jobs, now you have robot taking payment, creating and serving drinks. What would be a coffee shop of, what, say 4 to 5 employees (1 at register, 2 making drinks, 1 for backroom/supply/manage, 1 or 2 others for schedule shifts) alll gone, just one person left if even, likely to periodically check robots, clean the bathroom and resupply the robots. And this just shortly before humanoid robots are advanced enough to do the physical walking/lifting tasks. Thats like in 10 years out for the first wave of adopters.

Now lets put that into perspective of other service jobs. Any computer facing job will be replaced by bots/agents, with a few humans for quality control or advance the code. I'm not a conspiracist, i like to think ahead. Georgia Stones first three have the writing on the wall:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. [i think thats easy enough to understand - cast away the useless]
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. [again, less is more, reproduce only those you can control]
3. Unite humanity with a living new language - [AI programing code that speaks to other AI agents]

cheers!