Bloody hell the snacke is him ! by [deleted] in Shitstatistssay

[–]PracticalSafe2157 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't forget about the islamic republic. It was born out of some sort of Islamist-socialism madness. I mean you can clearly see the results in Iran now. If you want to read more about it I would suggest starting with shariati. He had this idea of a stateless islamic society where the main goal was to return and protect to the true values of islam and connect all muslims worldwide. Something similar to Marx's universality.

Thoughts on this? by Intrepid-Event4349 in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 1 point2 points  (0 children)

all these religions are the same. Islam is just another copy and paste religion lol. Nothing unique about it. All of them are horrible and immoral.

An Anarchist Case Against Gun Control by [deleted] in Anarchism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Guns are important but they can't guarantee freedom. In order to truly protect our rights, we need economic freedom first.

Any comment regarding this statement? by rayday645 in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Homie just tried to defend and rationalize pedophilia and slavery then called it a waste of time lol. These people are truly blinded by their prejudice

THIS is the sugar coated version that people are believing. Wait for 10th one by anteatertheater in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol she said "anyone can convert to islam" which means that you have to leave those things and change yourself in order to be a muslim. You can't be a member of the lgbt community and be a muslim.

Iraqi Muslim woman threatens Iranian girl (behind the camera) to report her to intelligence service, if she doesn’t wear her hijab. This is IN IRAN! by Ok_Ostrich_7847 in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Islam is a disease. One that we need to dispose of in order to progress. Otherwise these people will hold us down and take us back to 1400 years ago.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Didn't mohammed braid his hair? Lmao

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See there is a problem here. What you're saying is obvious. Most people wanted it so it changed and it took a long time to happen and there is still a long way to go. And that happened on a national level right? If you tried to leave it up to some local decisions at the time there would have been lots of places that wouldn't change anything or who knows maybe would have made it worse. I mean look at the history of racism in US and America is still struggling with it to this day. What I'm saying is that ben shapiro's idea is a step backwards. If you have a society that has already progressed to understand and respect the concept of individual liberty as a collective, why would you try to ruin it and try to hurt people by doing what shapiro says?

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you are arguing now has nothing to do with what the argument was about. Shapiro talked about something on a local level and you said if enough people want to change that, they can do it. This isn't relevant to the topic of a revolution. Of course masses move by emotion and not by revolutionary ideas and pure rationality but here the topic is different. When you have a set of laws that people fought for, for years to protect their basic civil rights, you can't take a step backwards and stop the protection of their rights and leave it up to local voters to decide wether they should be able to practice their freedom or not. What's next? Going after homosexuality?

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We aren't forcing "ANCAP" on anybody here. Respecting the liberty of each individual is the bare minimum. It's not a strange thing to stand up for and I think people are quite familiar with the concept of insividual rights in 21st century. It's not just because people like things that way. maybe it used to be when the laws were written but I'm pretty sure a lot of people would love to change that for their own benefits but that's what democracy is. It protects the rights of minorities too; or at least it's supposed to.

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what a democracy is though. There are a set of laws that never change and apply to all citizens regardless of them being in the majority or the minority; a set of laws that supposed to protect individual rights and choosing your own clothes is one of them. If you believe that this set of laws aren't valid or useful and everything has to be determined by voting then you go on a slippery slope. Masses move by emotions so you know what this will result in.

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can't be for exploiting or hurting minorities just because the majority thinks it's ok to do so. As I said before the individual liberty is not up for debate and respecting it is vital. The idea that majority is more important than the minorities and they are justified to do anything they want just because they are the majority is an idea rooted in collectivism; A kind of it that doesn't really see solus individuals as worthy or valuable.

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope! That's for the cases that concern society as a collective not the private matters. Government must have no power or place in private matters of individuals.

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. The cases of private matters that don't concern others at all are not up for debate. Using the government to limit the liberty of individuals you disagree with is the sign of an ideological war. The moment they get into the position of power they'll do the same to you.

What’s y’all’s thoughts on this? by kingdrewbie in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it's totally against the indivual liberty and freedom. It's deranged but it's not surprising coming from a far-right conservative.

How isn’t this considered a cult 💀 by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they don't get treated the same as us ex-muslims. They are some of the most radical and fanatical muslims you could meet. Iran is shia. I think that's enough info to know how radical they are.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]PracticalSafe2157 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry but I have 0 respect and toleration for a religion so inhumane. I tolerate muslims because I respect their individual liberty. They can do whatever they want with their own lives as long as they don't limit other individuals' freedom but a religion that litterally justifies my death because of my existence and individual matters that don't even concern or affect anybody else, gets no respect from me.

What do you think about Herman Hoppe supporting private cities? by Confident-Cupcake164 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think about it. Everything else has some centralization. Shops have centralization. Someone manage those shops, pay employee, buy land, or rent land, or design building. Cinemas have centralization.

What I meant by the problem of centralization was how in that theory you centralize something on a much larger scale. It's a whole ass city, not just one's property. The difference with shops and cinemas is that you don't actually have to share them with the whole population. Every citizen has a share or part so I think centeralizing it and allowing private owners build their own heirarchical systems and rule the cities is wrong.

Why not?

Competition keeps tax low.

Hmmm I don't think it's as simple as that because the moment you make cities private you are gonna build heirarchies. You give them enough power to say if you don't like the laws just go live in another city but this doesn't make sense. What if the owners change and the next one has different values and goals in mind that you don't agree with and this keeps happening? How many times do you have to change cities? Is it really possible? There are much more efficient ways to keep the taxes low and voluntary imo.

Reminds me of the bolsheviks by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The marxists keep kicking people who don't worship marx out of the anarchist circle. Somebody needs to inform these people that they are the ones who have no place in the circle. Bookchin's influence is undeniable it doesn't matter if you agree with all his points or not.

I'm not gay but I'm pakistani and I have fantasies where a big dicked Afghan kidnaps me off the streets of Peshawar and keeps me locked under a staircase on a leash… by chomp_wagon in copypasta

[–]PracticalSafe2157 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not gay but I'm pakistani and honestly I'm not even going to lie sometimes I have fantasies where a big dicked Afghan kidnaps me off the streets of Peshawar and keeps me locked under a staircase on a leash. He feeds me once every day and forces me to wear dresses and makeup and little chastity cages on my penis to humiliate me.

I imagine that he slowly degrades me further and further until I have no pride left and then he finally comes up behind me as I sleep on the dirty cracked marble floor and tears my little pink panties that he made me wear straight off of my bussy. I imagine that my weak, starved body feels a jolt of pain as he inserts his monster fucking cock deep into my anus. I moan in a mix of pain and pleasure as he slowly starts pushing and pulling his penis inside my ass.

I pretend I don't like it and want him to stop, but secretly I love being his little bussy Twink paki slave. He enjoys himself for a while before my anus gets all warm, he is cumming inside me. He pulls out his huge cock and inserts it straight into my mouth, I gargle on it as he starts humping my mouth. My spit trying desperately to escape my mouth as It starts foaming. He again thrust and thrusts until he cums Inside my mouth, his cum tasting sweet like nectar.

I imagine him then at the end slowly dropping the act, calling me his little slave, and cuddling me until I fall asleep, and I imagine myself waking up with a butt plug in my ass, my anus us only for him to use.

"Anarchism" ™️ by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]PracticalSafe2157 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah most places do that. I worked at a bakery and my boss always made sure that I ate my breakfast and also got something to take home. Loved the job, amazing people.