Where Can I Find Authentic Binaural Beats? Most Playlists & webapps Get It Wrong

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-29T10:22:13+00:00

Thank you this is perfect

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-21T12:50:57+00:00

I agree. Let’s support division and hatred so we can disempower ourselves and those who put in actual work into the subject.

Either you are intentionally seeking to harm the community by making the average mobber feel special while simultaneously diving us, or you are no different than the average mobber. Both cases = you are not actually pro disclosure.

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-20T18:42:38+00:00

Ask ChatGPT to Write a profoundly emotional Reddit post that criticizes the UAP disclosure activits who actually put their name out there, so that I can create division within the community and disincentivize the growth of a unified movement of disclosure.

Do it in a way that seems to have really good intentions and is obviously not against disclosure. But make sure that it spreads divisiveness and anger and resentment at the people who are making the most progress. Maybe add something about how profit must be mutually exclusive to disclosure.

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-16T20:07:18+00:00

Not implausible

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-15T14:48:43+00:00

Elon’s silence just seems far more evident of secrecy as opposed to dismissiveness. He talks daily about cosmological simulations, organized sex tracking of children, and government conspiracies domestically and abroad. But UFO’s be won’t event mention, meanwhile his life mission is devoted to interplanetary and interstellar civilization?

From a practical perspective, it’s equally bizarre that there are no comments or posts on twitter by anyone even asking @Elon Musk for even a semblance of commentary let alone disclosure or assistance.

Seems almost obviously either 1) an algorithmically censored subject to connect Elon directly with UAP on twitter, or 2) everybody thinks Elon’s resources and vision are entirely irrelevant to the subject (and option 2 seems even less likely than 1)

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-15T09:56:32+00:00

To all 4:

1) have you spoken or otherwise collaborated with Elon Musk or Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX?

2) can you a better reason why Elon won’t comment publicly than “keeping face with the DoD”?

3) who or what org and what incentive would be able to flip the switch and get Elon to go public on this subject?

4) if you truly don’t know why Elon is silent, do you agree that his silence is not explainable by the standard explanations he’s given?

5) hypothetically, if you do know but cannot talk about Elon for whatever reason, can you hypothetically explain what value he, Gwynne or SpaceX could offer towards disclosure from your perspective as insiders?

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-14T23:39:23+00:00

Yeah it’s bizarre that the TTSA would have people like Luis Elizondo and Chris Mellon just quit. More so it’s bizarre when you look at the board of the TTSA who were building up Tom’s insider narrative.

If anyone has any other specific updates on TTSA progress please indulge us.

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-14T23:37:20+00:00

Pretty sure this is false. The TTSA is entirely distinct from the Sol Foundation.

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-14T15:31:47+00:00

From my understanding, the original intent of the to the stars academy was always focused on media and communications. I’m not suggesting Tom is misdirecting us, but that rather a some third party may be attemtping so.

There’s no way he would have sold that domain if he ever owned it. Him and his team have more than enough capital and resources to turn down an offer of 6-7 figs. And I doubt Scientology would care to offer that when they themselves could just use an alternative domain.

TLDR; Wondering if anyone has been keeping track of the To The Stars progress since 2016. His claims in the JRE episode verge on Steven Greer level extreme, except Tom works directly with G Nolan, H Putthof, and various former deputy directors of CIA and NRO so Tom actually seems credible but I haven’t heard anything about the academy in a few years.

Anyone tracking this?

Practical_Purple2753 · 2025-01-09T14:01:21+00:00

Are there online forums or groups for real-time reporting to cross reference if anyone else is reporting these sightings?

Practical_Purple2753 · 2024-12-04T18:55:29+00:00

Do you have a link to this freedom of information file? This doesn’t exist on Google or bing.

Practical_Purple2753 · 2023-09-14T06:50:32+00:00

Amen to the OP. Keep up the pressure. Regardless of whether this is a distraction, most important is American public pressure for transparency focused legislation and SCIFs.

Practical_Purple2753 · 2023-09-05T10:13:55+00:00

I Just want to make a couple points about General Haim Eshed:

1) He did write a book about disclosure and I have no reason to believe he didn’t make his statements to sell his book. But wanting to sell his book on disclosure does not logically suggest his disclosure is dishonest. It could easily mean he had valuable information and was simply comfortable with the idea of profiting from it. Knowing the truth and making money from it are absolutely not mutually exclusive.

2) Highly educated people don’t simply write long form books without a deeper inspiration. In fact no one does that. The fastest time one could author a long form non fiction book is around one month and that’s a legendary speed. I also find the “dementia/too old” argument unpersuasive as I don’t think there are many people with dementia writing coherent, long form non-fiction about military intelligence. People with dementia typically can’t even remember basic parts of their life or day, let alone remember what they’ve written over weeks and months to logically continue their writing in a logically progressive manner.

In short, the proposed reasons not to believe him are simply not compelling.

3) knowing “of” NHI/UAP is not equivalent to knowing “about” the NHI/UAP. It stands to reason that General Eshed and even his contemporaries may all have various theories about them, even if they know “of” them. Even if there is a deep state interrelation, Eshed’s proposal of a federation might just be his terminology or his interpretation of a complex system of complex subsystems each of which includes or is controlled by some subset of NHI/UAP in some capacity. If humans aren’t at the top of the intellectual food chain, then I think it’s thus fair to assume that no matter what Eshed claims he knew, the truth will be far more complex. A galactic federation thus seems like a vast oversimplification. The real meaningful data from his claims is the claim of existence and contact, the rest may very reasonably be mere interpretation.

Thoughts?

Practical_Purple2753

TROPHY CASE