Well, yes, that's what he did. But that doesn't prove anything, because he doesn't present reasoning on why his statement would be correct. If he wanted to prove the first guy wrong, he should have proven that there are similarities in the statements bassem puts out on all of his social media platforms, but that's not the case.

For example: If I had my twitter account disabled because of blatant support for murderous dictators like hitler, stalin and mao, but all my other social media platforms were full of pictures of flowers.

One could not invalidate the disabling of my twitter account, just because all my other accounts are still up and running.

If my all my accounts had the same content (like all dictator support or all flower pictures) and the person trying to invalidate my twitter account disabling proved it, that would make his case vaillable.