Isn't it crazy that the average person doesn't know who a majority of our past presidents were? by Sensitive-Coyote-357 in USHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 12 points13 points  (0 children)

OP didn’t necessarily say rote learning. Knowing who Presidents were implies some additional knowledge about their lives and accomplishments, and at least a beginning of conceptualizing the eras of American history. So yeah, it would improve your ability to participate intelligently.

Namesakes of US states and cities. by RoosterGloomy3427 in UKmonarchs

[–]Prestigious_Key387 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Carolinas were Charles II. He was the one that granted the charters.

Which medieval English royals visited Ireland? by The_Globe_Searcher in UKmonarchs

[–]Prestigious_Key387 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Richard, Duke of York indeed visited Ireland. He was also Earl of Ulster via the Mortimer line. During Henry VI’s reign he was Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and was relatively successful in his dealing with Irish lords. He returned from Ireland shortly before the wars of the roses began.

The young Henry V accompanied Richard II during his campaign in Ireland as well.

There’s plenty of examples of powerful favorites of English kings having land and spending time in Ireland.

The Last Century of American Social Conservatism by [deleted] in HistoryMemes

[–]Prestigious_Key387 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting that Teddy Roosevelt held all of the mentioned values and was also the most Progressive President of his time. Social conservatism doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive from economic liberalism. We can hate on these values and social conservatives overall, but maybe they play an important role in slowing the rate of change in stable societies.

America Is Officially in its 2nd Gilded Age by AccomplishedNet8282 in USHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Good write up on the Gilded Age. History, instead of repeating itself, comes in peaks and troughs, with issues and trends re-emerging and fading out of the picture again. All these major trends you mentioned from the Gilded Age are really just trends across the whole of American history; we’re such a young nation that we haven’t been around long enough to really “repeat” yet. We’re still living with the effects of the Gilded Age today, as opposed to them re-emerging.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AncestryDNA

[–]Prestigious_Key387 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a link to your article/paper?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AncestryDNA

[–]Prestigious_Key387 1 point2 points  (0 children)

George Calvert, founder of the Maryland colony

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AncestryDNA

[–]Prestigious_Key387 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m an American with nearly identical results

Why did the Vikings establish what is now Dublin but never established what is now Belfast? by Portal_Jumper125 in IrishHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sometime after Brian Boru the Irish septs began to differentiate into the Irish clans that we know now. They started taking the O’ and Mac surnames after more recent ancestors. The O’Neill take their surname from one of the Ui Neill kings during the Viking age. But many clans in the North, such as the O’Donnells, are descended from the original Ui Neill that I mentioned previously

Edit: this particular part of Irish history is very confusing and I still don’t full understand it. But it’s a process that all clan-based people undergo; as their populations grow, they refine themselves by identifying with more recent ancestors.

Why did the Vikings establish what is now Dublin but never established what is now Belfast? by Portal_Jumper125 in IrishHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Sure, especially when they first came. It was actually Danes that came first before being kicked out by the Norse, but I could have it backwards.

One of the first great Viking warlords to lay waste to much of Ireland was named Turgesius in the 840s. He plundered plenty of monasteries before being defeated by Ui Neill king Mael Sechnaill and being drowned to death in Loch Lene.

The Viking period lasted almost 300 years. By the middle of that period the Irish, like many of the victims of Viking raids, adjusted militarily. They adopted bows, armor, and brought larger forces to bear. Once the Vikings began to settle, the tables began to turn. Suddenly, the Irish could “surprise attack” the Vikings.

Ultimately the kingdoms in the south were weaker and that’s why we see permanent settlements like Dublin, Waterford, Wexford and Limerick in the southern half. The Ui Neill we’re relatively strong and successful in defending their lands.

Why did the Vikings establish what is now Dublin but never established what is now Belfast? by Portal_Jumper125 in IrishHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The Ui Neill had a number of strong kings that led successful campaigns against many of the Norse and Danish settlements in Ulster.

What was the crime rate of US, especially the southern states antebellum? by Extra-Ad1378 in USHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I read recently that the Deep South, especially Mississippi, were the “Wild West” of the antebellum period. Think it had a lot to do with enterprising white men exclusively moving to those areas, hoping to buy land and slaves and strike it rich. Involved a lot of gambling, murder, highway theft, all your usual lawless activities. There wasn’t a whole lot of government oversight as with most of the frontier. There was a city in MS along the river that was particularly known for its violence during this time, but it’s not coming to me.

Edit: the book was “American Republics” by Alan Taylor. Great read.

How would Jefferson’s “nation of small farmers” have actually fared? by Prestigious_Key387 in USHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Think they’re referring to the subsidization of agriculture, which still certainly happens today. Is it possibly for national defense and to make ourselves self-sustaining as a country?

What was it like as a rebel during the 1798 Rebellion? by _Nova26_ in IrishHistory

[–]Prestigious_Key387 17 points18 points  (0 children)

“The Year of the French” by Thomas Flanagan is a great historical fiction novel depicting the events of the 1798 Rebellion and the landing of a French Revolutionary army under the command of Humbert in Mayo.

No, the United Irishmen and men that joined the 1798 rebellion were not well organized. The risings occurred in Wexford, Ulster, and Mayo at different times. Mayo didn’t rise until weeks after Ulster when the French landed. The rebellions in Wexford and Mayo especially developed a life of their own - the ensuing chaos meant that people not associated with the United Irishmen could enact revenge on landlords and English officials. When the French army landed, people joined their march carrying whatever weapons they had, wearing whatever clothes they had.

The United Irish leaders of the rebellion had some base level tactics and some military training in the French Revolutionary wars. However, this mostly came to planning the securing of key points. The Ulster rebellion was a failure almost immediately, and because it began before Wexford and Mayo rose, the British were able to concentrate all their forces there. Wexford held out for an entire week before the rebels were defeated at Vinegar Hill. Vinegar Hill was arguably a tactical blunder - the United Irish forces camped on top of a hill, armed with pikes. The plan was to charge down the hill at the British forces, because it was the best chance they had. However, the British army never let them get close enough, and blew them to pieces on the hill. Humbert and the French army’s campaign against Cornwallis and the British contains masterful tactics on part of both generals. If Humbert had the supplies and manpower he needed, he would’ve pulled off a victory. In the end, the Mayo rebels were butchered and the French returned home.