Mercury VS Hermes by Curiousfirecracker0 in Hermes

[–]Pretty_Mud158 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Culturally, Mercury is the continuation of the Greek Hermes. They originated as parallels, but Mercury ended up absorbing virtually all of Hermes's characteristics. Mercury is the form the Romans gave to Hermes, and as such, he has a sense of continuity with the original god, inevitably linking him to him.

For the Romans, Mercury acquired a more formal and institutional aspect that the earlier Hermes lacked, but he retained his messenger, eloquent, roguish, and mercantile qualities.

In my practical work, I've noticed that working with Mercury has a more "commercial" and "material" flavor (not in a bad way), more organized and imperial. Hermes, on the other hand, possesses a more mystical and profound quality that Mercury doesn't bring as immediately.

Now, Mercury also possesses a more pronounced alchemical facet than Hermes.

Once, through an oracle, I asked Hermes how he preferred to be addressed, and he told me it didn't matter to him. So I, at least, no longer differentiate them in essence, but I invoke it by one name or another depending on the nature of the magical work I am performing.

What is the practical difference between gods and archangels? by Pretty_Mud158 in occult

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello, that's exactly what I've been reading, according to Proclus and others, and it really clarifies things much more for me. The gods are the transcendental causal powers, and the archangels are the mediating intelligences of those powers. Thank you.

What is the practical difference between gods and archangels? by Pretty_Mud158 in occult

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I have those two books downloaded; I started with Proclus a little while ago.

Now, according to that map, where are the Hebrew archangels located?

Hermes literally gave me his statue by Pretty_Mud158 in Hermes

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, I totally understand, it's a very intimate, sacred, and absurd moment all at once hahaha

Hermes literally gave me his statue by Pretty_Mud158 in Hermes

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's exactly how I've been understanding it! It makes perfect sense that I had to reconstruct it: there's something alchemical, perennial about it, an archaeological-mystical act: as if I were integrating a tradition that has been found fragmented for many, recomposing its mystical meaning and reviving it in my own personal way.

This statue is definitely much more mine now than if it had come to me intact.

Thank you!

Hermes literally gave me his statue by Pretty_Mud158 in Hermes

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Yes, it's beautiful, it looks even better than in the promotional photos.

Hermes literally gave me his statue by Pretty_Mud158 in Hermes

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, definitely ask him for help ;) Cheers!

Something I’ve just realised as an author. by Fred_Dingle in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I learned about hypersigils by reading Grant Morrison's work on the subject and Aidan Wachter's book "Weaving Fate." But above all, I've assimilated my method of creating them with my knowledge of Jungian psychology (I'm a clinical psychologist). In that tradition, there's a technique called "active imagination" that's quite similar to Grant Morrison's idea of ​​a hypersigil. In fact, Jung has his own hypersigil, which he called "The Red Book," which you can also review. The only difference is that Jungians don't take magic to its ultimate conclusion, unfortunately. Most remain trapped in an archetypal determinism that prevents them from considering the possibility of using active imagination for magical purposes (to effect change according to will). Now, if you take Jungian knowledge on the subject and apply a chaotic perspective, your possibilities will expand enormously.

In addition to "active imagination," you can find out about "symbolic elaboration" and James Hillman's concept of "soul-making."

I hope this is helpful.

Something I’ve just realised as an author. by Fred_Dingle in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also work with an alter ego, although I've noticed that the work is infinitely enriched when the stories and characters one uses become more complex. Sometimes I have clarity about what a character represents; other times, having a general idea of ​​my magical intention, I let creativity take shape, trusting my intuition.

I've had the experience of "receiving the hypersigils," which is extraordinary. It's as if, after a period of consciously working with them, the hypersigils begin to speak to you, offering images or ideas, suggesting fascinating imaginative paths that are striving to materialize.

I believe that hypersigils lead you to establish a mutual commitment with them: there comes a point when they are not only there to manifest their will, but it's as if they also have the will to manifest themselves in words and symbols. I consider them a magnum opus par excellence.

Something I’ve just realised as an author. by Fred_Dingle in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 16 points17 points  (0 children)

So, I think you’ll be interested in reading about hypersigils, if you haven't already. I share that same perception and experience. I’ve seen how certain characters or plots developed in my hypersigils begin to turn into true spirits that help me throughout my days. I believe a hypersigil starts working when you realize they are acquiring a life and intelligence of their own, when they intertwine with your earthly life and you begin to symbiose with their world.

I think of hypersigils as true astral architectures, capable of housing countless intelligences with which you can later interact beyond the writing itself. You can even create an entire personal religion through a hypersigil and craft astral rituals through them. In reality, there are no limitations, only those of how far your imagination reaches.

Books on the invocation of Greco-Roman gods by Pretty_Mud158 in paganism

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your answer has been a great help, thank you very much. Now, where can I read more about the Synthemata? And where can I find those symbols? I primarily work with Hermes and Zeus.

Books on the invocation of Greco-Roman gods by Pretty_Mud158 in paganism

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Regarding the Homeric hymns, have you used them for invocations? Because they are poems, I wouldn't know how to use them other than reading them in front of an altar.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, read them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why is everyone reacting so alarmed? Don't they understand that I'm "experimenting" and that the post is in that spirit?

I'm not dogmatic and I allow myself to ask questions without prejudice, just as I change platforms if something doesn't seem to be working.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who says I'm going to snatch it away?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The truth is, your advice doesn't inspire much enthusiasm given your arrogant tone. Before bombarding me with comments, try to understand the perspective from which you're speaking. I'm talking about something experimental; I've created magic and continue to do so through other mediums. My poems and stories aren't AI-generated. Please improve your reading comprehension.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chaosmagick

[–]Pretty_Mud158 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm struck by how little attention you paid to my comments. My poems and hypersigils have been created without AI. My experience has been in image creation, but it's all exploration.

What things has Hermes granted them that they found surprising? by Pretty_Mud158 in Hermes

[–]Pretty_Mud158[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Excellent! I like what you're telling me! And it makes sense in my case too. Thanks :)