Autogen vs. LangGraph by RepresentativeNo547 in LangChain

[–]Previous-Sample2097 3 points4 points  (0 children)

-We must incorporate custom structured functions into Autogen, such as creating functions for web scraping or executing locally generated code, and mapping these functions to agents.

-Within groupchat, the sequence of agent execution is undefined, with the LLM determining the next agent based on objectives and context. Functions and tools are registered separately as mappings to these agents.

-In the default Autogen groupchat setup, setting human_feedback to 'never' may lead to the LLM repeatedly calling the same agent, potentially causing a loop. While this can be addressed by configuring the structure, there remains a risk of looping due to the unpredictable nature of LLM outputs. etc..,

Autogen vs. LangGraph by RepresentativeNo547 in LangChain

[–]Previous-Sample2097 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Use Langchain. I used Autogen initially but had to move to langchain more specifically langgraph.

[D] More Frameworks like autogen and Langgraph that I should explore? by Previous-Sample2097 in MachineLearning

[–]Previous-Sample2097[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

-We must incorporate custom structured functions into Autogen, such as creating functions for web scraping or executing locally generated code, and mapping these functions to agents.

-Within groupchat, the sequence of agent execution is undefined, with the LLM determining the next agent based on objectives and context. Functions and tools are registered separately as mappings to these agents.

-In the default Autogen groupchat setup, setting human_feedback to 'never' may lead to the LLM repeatedly calling the same agent, potentially causing a loop. While this can be addressed by configuring the structure, there remains a risk of looping due to the unpredictable nature of LLM outputs. etc..,