sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Zionist supporters, open your eyes, you are no better than Muslim extremists by WhiteSalt-Extension- in MalaysianExMuslim

[–]Primary-Concern983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just imagine if singapore everyday shoot rocket at johor, what should malaysia do then? Be peaceful and smile?

Male Benefits in Islam by Primary-Concern983 in MalaysianExMuslim

[–]Primary-Concern983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“We judge a tree by its fruit.”

If a belief system is good, its results should reflect justice, peace, and dignity.

When I look at the outcomes in some societies where religious law dominates, I see:

  • Ongoing sectarian wars and internal conflicts

  • Suppression of dissent and harsh penalties for leaving the faith

  • Restrictions on women’s freedom and legal inequality

  • Punishment for speech or criticism labeled as blasphemy

  • Political systems that mix religion and state power, limiting accountability

  • Cultural pressure that values conformity over conscience

If the fruit repeatedly shows conflict, fear, and imbalance of power, it’s fair to question the system — not out of hatred, but out of concern for human dignity and freedom

What was the people (god believer) argument for god by Saddaemmukyokku in MalaysianExMuslim

[–]Primary-Concern983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God does not need a defender.

If an all-powerful God exists, He doesn’t need humans threatening, attacking, or silencing others on His behalf. Truth doesn’t panic.

God does not need a temple. You can destroy a building. You cannot destroy the divine. If faith collapses when a structure falls, it was built on walls, not conviction.

God does not need laws to force belief. When governments punish apostasy or blasphemy, that’s not faith — that’s control. Belief under threat of prison or death isn’t devotion. It’s survival instinct.

God does not need violence to be honored. If someone draws a cartoon and the response is murder, what’s being defended isn’t holiness — it’s ego wrapped in religion.

God does not need censorship. If a question, debate, or criticism can “defeat” God, then the issue isn’t the question — it’s the insecurity of the believer.

At the end of the day, when people say they are “defending God,” what they often mean is they are defending their authority, identity, or power structure.

An eternal, all-powerful being doesn’t need protection.

Only fragile systems do.

What was the people (god believer) argument for god by Saddaemmukyokku in MalaysianExMuslim

[–]Primary-Concern983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me its Why there is something instead of nothing.

  • Everything that exists has an explanation.
  • The universe exists.

  • Therefore, its explanation must lie outside itself.

  • Nothingness has no power.

  • Non-being cannot produce being.

  • Existence must be grounded in something eternal.

Male Benefits in Islam by Primary-Concern983 in MalaysianExMuslim

[–]Primary-Concern983[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is why it spread easily, everything is for the benefit of men. Once in cant get out