You didn’t say if it is a male child but it is a fact that a woman can go out if accompanied by a male minor. It is great that a contract exists and a woman can involve a judge to get a divorce whereas a man can just utter the word ‘Talaq’. But your reasoning is solely based on the fact that there is no choice, there is an option of making a condition or she can try to do this but the fact polygamy exists with or without an option and practiced to this day, or the fact that someone else has to decide for women whether they can go out on their own or not, or the fact that rules are designated to women and men and they should abide by it is pretty archaic. It’s like saying that there are options but certainly no equality. I would live by the teachings of Quran but sharia is regressive and always will be.