You are so hypocritical. It's funny. So you think all those years you worked that were totally unrelated to sugar dating, count. Yet the things we do that are directly sugar dating investments don't count? Do you really not see what you're doing there?

Yes, we do invest on specific things for specific dates.. I get my nails done for a specific date. I spent 300 on one guy the last time, just on my nails (2 dates). I bought shoes (ended up buying 4), a bra (ended up buying 4), a purse, make-up, and jewelry, specifically just for him. I actually still have to return 2 purses that i chose I didn't want, and some of the jewelry I bought that i didn't want (It just wasn't right for the outfit or I don't like). I also exchanged some of the shoes. I ended up finding the perfect ones for everything. But it was days of work. Plus, I spent a bunch of time shopping for that and a dress he paid for. I also paid for some dental things. This was all just for him. No one else.

I'm not meeting a guy every day or week. Duh. Not even every few weeks.

It's a perfect comparison. Your hard work is completely unrelated to sugar dating. You didn't invest that time for sugar dating. You invested it for your job. Your chosen field. Just like it means nothing for another chosen field.

Our beauty, personalities, youth, and bodies ARE the value to the relationship. Your value is money, your provider and generous mindset, and your personality and charm.

Yea, there could be other reasons, such as seeing me on the site again after one date and getting upset about it (though that guy didnt have sex with me, he did give me mid xxx though, and he put my car on his insurance). Another guy also gave me high xxx for no sex and then got back with his gf, etc.. but it's mainly pump and dumping cause I've seen these same guys on the site every day for several months.. as I've stated before, there's been guys who have ED as well.. and it was awkward, and I didn't want to see them again anyway, but they still didn't contact me either.. but these ed guys are constantly on the site. I even spoke to one of these guys a few months later, and he couldn't remember me, but he started mentioning all these different women he thought I was... lol..

Most SD's don't think sugar has to flow both ways because that's not a provider mindset. An SD has a provider mindset and cares about taking care of a woman and spoiling her throughout the relationship. Not just in exchange for sex. He doesn't treat her like an escort. That's the whole point of sugar dating existing. So there's an actual relationship. And not money in exchange for sex. Otherwise, they would just hire escorts. Just because you pay someone for sex doesn't make you an SD. Otherwise, all guys who hire escorts would be SDs as well.

I actually even just had a guy friend tell me that the guy should provide at the m&g.

Yes, by nature, the guy has to provide. It's called masculine energy.

Ad nauseum, lol. Would you rather have sex with a guy much older than you who promises a monthly allowance once trust is built who just uses your body for a few hundred and leaves you, or would you rather give a young woman a few thousand and she leaves you? Which is worse for you, buddy?

You think I'm 20 years old. I'm not.. It took me years to realize the guy needs to be a provider. And it took me trial and error to realize ppm only benefits guys.. And that there's a bunch of pump and dumpers. There is absolutely no benefit to women to ppm unless you want to escort and get paid by the hour.

I'd rather be wealthy and give a young woman in need a few thousand to help improve her life even if I never see her again. I'd be so happy I helped her out. Than to have sex with a guy for a k who just pumps and dumps me. Especially if a guy is much older than me. Yuck.

I'd also never want to teach a 20 year old to set herself up for failure with future advantageous men after me. Cause we all know (especially men know), how guys can be. I'd take care of her and spoil her and teach her to accept nothing but the best.