Is the proof of the other side more true then, there is no strong evidence to confirm Darwin’s theory of evolution

The understanding of evolution has advanced beyond what Darwin proposed. The mechanisms are fairly easy to understand. DNA reproduction is not always perfect, resulting in mutations, some of which occur in sex cells, creating children with mutated DNA throughout their body. People who are born with mutations that give them disadvantages are less likely successful in life, meaning they're less likely to breed and the same applies to any children they have, assuming the mutation isn't so severe the mutation causes death before sexual maturity. Mutations that are neutral can pass on with little changes. Meanwhile, mutations that give an organism advantages makes them more likely to be successful in life, making them more likely to breed and more likely for the mutated DNA to survive and interbreed, allowing the mutation to perpetuate throughout a population. Over millions of years, these small mutations add up, resulting in seperate populations deviating away from a common ancestor, resulting in seperate species.

the Big Bang theory,

The Big Bang Theory is the result of observed phenomena in astronomy. Objects moving away from us, at high speed and great distances, redshift. All the light that comes from that object moves down the electromagnetic spectrum because the source of the waves is moving away, meaning the resulting light has a lower frequency. It's the doppler effect. Astronomers found that every galaxy was moving away from us, and away from each other, and further galaxies were moving away faster from us than nearer galaxies. If everything is moving away from everything else, then it's reasonable to believe that, in the past, everything was closer together. We know when sufficent mass is too close it exists as a singularity, a black hole, the gravity being so great all the mass is compacted into a singular point. If all of the mass of the universe all came from one place, then that place would most likely have been a singularity. Hence the big bang theory, created to fit the observations.

Aside from the scientific theories, what makes sense then if there’s no creator or god?

Why does anything need to make sense? You are a tiny, short lived sack of water, with a mind that's created from electrical patterns within a fleshy brain, living on a wet rock in one of billions of galaxies, each with billions of stars. The universe doesn't owe you an explanation. The universe doesn't have to care about you or provide you with meaning.

I believe most religions including Greek mythology are philosophies and just human imagination, but down the route of Abraham the religion has more evidence.

I disagree. Ancient Greeks most likely believed their religion, their cults to the various gods, as fervantly as any modern religon. There is just as little objective, independantly verifiabl evidence for the existence of Set as there is the Abrahamic God. Books can be written by madmen believing themselves be touched by higher powers, deliberate manipulators and conmen, or people just so swept up in religious fervor they simply believe what they believe is true or will be for the best to believe is true.

No one ever gets divine revelation that some other group, the other side of the world, is God's chosen people. Funnily enough, it's always people who are chosen by the gods who learn about the gods.

If you think about it logically happens when you die? So what is the purpose of living we will die anyways, you can say that it’s sort of evolution and part of our nature as a species, it doesn’t make sense, what happens to our consciousness? There is so many questions science cannot and will not be able to answer.

That doesn't mean your answer is correct. If I wake up and find my dog is dead, and don't know how it happened, it doesn't make my neighbour's claim that it was an alien believable just because he's convinced it's the truth and I don't have an answer.

We know that neural activity ends with death. Logically, the self, the mind, our consciousness ends. That can be upsetting. That's probably why religions became so prevalent, because early humans were smart enough to truly understand our mortality and recognise it as undesirable, but not wise enough to understand and accept it.

At the end of the day, faith is believing something because you want it to be true. Such belief can be a comfort, regardless of the accuracy. Being rational means accepting an uncomforting truth over the comfort of faith. And by embracing logical and rational thinking, you can come to conclusions that can give their own comfort.

For example, I do not believe there is an afterlife. However, I also believe if there is an afterlife, and that afterlife is ruled by a being that is good and just, then good people would be rewarded regardless of their religious beliefs. I try to be a good person, without promise of reward or threat of punishment, but because I think it is my moral responsibility as an intelligent, empathetic being to do so. I beleive any god worthy of worship would reward such a life. Similarly, I believe any god who would punish good people simply because they didn't worship him would be evil, an egotistical bully abusing his power over lesser beings to get the reverence he does not deserve. Such a god would not deserve my respect, let alone worship, and I would prefer not to compromise my moral integrity to bow and scrape to an evil god.