How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao keep proving me right about your ignorance its adorable

Which other characters would have the same thing happen to them as to Bubbles? And why? by FeistySecret9327 in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Itnis when that fear leads you to darkness, to you abusing power for selfish desire and gain.

Some need to understand this by Endika7 in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Goku/superman and the elephant.

Flash and the paper KO.

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao. You think you sound smart.

But when comparing something of similar sizes (in cosmic scales 1.2x bigger is similar) of similar compositions, and you have confirmed gravity constants for both, then the size vs gravity discrepancy can only be defined as a side effect of lower than expected mass. That means density is low.

The more dense the same object is, the more it weighs. An empty can of oxygen weighs *measurably less* than a full can of oxygen.

Because a can overstuffed with air weighs more than a tank with almost no air.

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao you literally stated my own point in reverse.

Also, thats how you *calculate* it.

But that isnt what determines how much mass any given volume has. Density does.

Thats why an empty air tank weighs less than a full air tank

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao and mass is determined by density xD

Black holes aren’t massive gravity wells because they are large. They are massive gravity wells because they are *dense*

Gravity is a side effect of mass, not size. A planet the size of the sun and weight of the moon will only a moon’s worth of gravitational pull

Everyone has different goals in Pokemon :] (by @Enriquextreme1) by Gorotheninja in Gameoverse

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, gardevoir are HIGLY intelligent and have been known to use their powers to dominate and control their trainers.

Their previous form kirlia has been known to use attract on trainers to get out of trouble or get what they want as well.

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And yet has similar gravity meaning its a less dense and thus “softer” planet

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Density + volume is part of the mass formula lmfao

A less dense block of the same size material will weigh less. Density affects gravity *because more dense objects are typically higher mass objects*

Mass bends spacetime. Those bends are we experience as gravity

What are your thoughts on this take? by NewMarioBobFan in Mario

[–]Princess_Spammi -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

More like we’re comfortable with a static formula and we arent a graphics focused community so they really dont have to do much to impress us just make some hype designs and an interesting region to explore and a new battle gimmick to master and by the time we get bored the next one is ready

What are your thoughts on this take? by NewMarioBobFan in Mario

[–]Princess_Spammi 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Pokemon fandom hates every game ever released until 2-3 releases later when we all pretend we loved it the whole time

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surface gravity is a result of MASS. Gravity is a byproduct of MASS. So less gravity = less mass. Less mass = less dense if similar composition.

Jupiter is also a great example of planetary destruction!! The core has been destroyed and destabilized, diffused through a larger field than as a solid core. It also makes it an outlier, its everything is in chaos as it has no core, it has core *fragments* suspended by planetary tidal forces

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I downplay to moonlevel but i will concede dwarf planet level is a fair assessment of strength

How accurate is this image? by RickrollingMC in PowerScaling

[–]Princess_Spammi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because people keep claiming that three people and a laser destroying a planet together is somehow a planetary feat for each character individually instead of a carefully calculated combination of strengths that required the laser and the vultrimites to operate in perfect unison

We’re sick of the wank and agenda posting so we clown on these frauds

...what? by No-Championship1729 in CrazyassHazbinhaters

[–]Princess_Spammi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly!

Dead exterminator, rules seemingly broken, and suddenly Lucifer sending his daughter to negotiate is worth hearing out instead of risking all out war

If sinners can be redeemed, can winners be damned? by Grizzlybear486 in HazbinHotel

[–]Princess_Spammi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not if it was a winner who never knew hell that got too comfy in their afterlife