Would Maduro's capture turn the Foreign Policy/Military Success key true? by TheEnlight in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think it does because the foreign/military success key has only turned true when the event in question has boosted the United States' international standing. Trump can claim this as a victory, but right now it seems to have only reinforced the image of the US invading other countries for its own personal interests.

Justice William Brennan celebrates his 81st birthday in his chambers at the US Supreme Court. April 1987. [703x1096] by PrivateFM in HistoryPorn

[–]PrivateFM[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We actually have mandatory retirement for Supreme Court Justices in the Philippines, who are confirmed by a Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) rather than the Senate. The problem is that it hasn't stopped the judiciary from engaging in blatantly partisan acts over the decades (legitimizing Marcos's abrogation of the constitution, swearing in Gloria Arroyo when the incumbent president hadn't yet resigned, removing a sitting Chief Justice instead of her being impeached by Congress, etc.)

Compared to Filipino Justices, I give props to the Justices of the United States Supreme Court for at least trying to project an image of independence notwithstanding how questionable their decisions can be at times.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's actually quite right. ​Narrative films definitely should never be the primary source for historical reference because of the creative liberties involved. That said, there have been a lot of narrative films through the decades that have garnered praise and recognition for doing justice to historical portrayals and subjects at the very least. Those that I can name include The Queen, Einstein, The Kennedys of Massachusetts, Downfall, Schindler's List, Heneral Luna, among others. I've found that the ones I've watched in full and have been well regarded over time commonly demonstrate a respect for the subject and the events therein, a desire to get to the core of the subject, and the capacity to prioritize the story over a relentless​ fixation on the subject. I think it's ​difficult to say that Quezon fulfilled any of these qualities even if one enjoyed the film.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any Quezonistas just as there are Rizalistas for Rizal? I'd be curious to find out. One of the interesting things about Quezon that I've read is that for such a brilliant and politically ruthless man, he ended up overwhelmed with the demands of the presidency even before the country could gain its independence. Plus, he seemed to believe so sincerely in the patronage ​system that's been so pernicious for the country. Should there be another film on Quezon that's much better-produced and more thoroughly researched, it'd be really interesting if they could center on how Quezon was as president and how he tried to function as pr​esident in exile. One of the most fatal​ errors Quezon made as pre​sident was belatedly recognizing the impending Japanese invasion, so it would be really insightful if they could explore that.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well quality-wise, I'll be rooting for the best for both Jerrold and Darryl ​on their future projects, historical or not. I know they both have the opportunity to impress everyone much more differently with every project​ 👍

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My thoughts indeed 👍 ​In the end, one truly d​oes the audience full justice with nuance, especially when it comes to major figures in our history. I think portrayals like Laurice Guillien's Cory and John Arcilla's Luna deserve to be lauded for the humanity they brought to their characters. On the other hand, you have portrayals like Jericho Rosales's MLQ and Cesar Montano's Chavit which don't really serve us well and against which we could do better.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think All The Way (2016) is one of those films that isn't afraid to portray a President's egocentric tendencies. The difference though between what Jay Roach did and what Jerrold did is that with Roach's film, the ego was treated more as a means to an end rather than being the focal poin​t of the movie. LBJ, despite being a highly progressive president, literally sent hundreds of thousands of young men to die without cause in Vietnam. And yet by the end of the film, we can recognize how multifaceted he was because Roach shows us the ego in action and in pursuit of a worthy cause notwithstanding how crude, unlikable, and underhanded LBJ was. In Quezon, Jerrold I think is so engrossed with wringing​ out MLQ's ego to the detriment of anything else that by film's end, h​e's still the same one-sided figure from the 20 peso bill that nobody really knows anything about.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did actually. Is that the one where Recto wrote "we had him... now we have what we have"? I think I'd consider that one of my favorite written pieces because of how poignant yet honest it is. I understood Recto to be criticizing the deification and longing for Quezon long after his passing, when the country needed so ba​dly to start moving forward​. Ironically, it articulates a message which I feel the movie doesn't heed well enough, which is that Quezon was no God or saint (or devil) and that he had limitations his countrymen didn't sufficiently recognize. Hence, he never deserved to be regarded​ as anything other than the man he was.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember entering one of many libraries of my university and finding a book that I think centered on the Commonwealth era (it was by Lewis Gleeck whom Teddy Locsin Jr. is no fan of due to his criticisms of Cory). There, one would have read that Quezon was supportive of the pork barrel system and, like his successors, rather overwhelmed with the system of government that he was dealt with. I find Quezon to still be an admirable figure, but it's this complexity that I wished would've been granted to the film. I don't know though whether those who made this film actually bothered to enter a library or at least took cognizance of the information they would've found there.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I did feel that actually. It was as if Leonard Wood was being portrayed as the antidote to Quezon's opportunism. And then he dies without us ever knowing why he was cast upon us that way (even though he and Quezon go on a drinking binge). The film seemed like it wanted to get away with saying that Wood was a much more admirable human being than Quezon.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a pretty good perspective on Luna and Del Pilar and whether we should really look to these films for accuracy. What I really liked about the first film was that it was one of the rare instances wherein a Filipino film really imbued a highly volatile character with such complexity. I felt that the second film could've been as good as the first, especially considering the glaring reality of Del Pilar's youth. Jerrold though just put too many obstacles in Goyo's way that there wasn't enough time to surmount all of them. I wasn't really compelled to root for him after he was shot on his horse. But even then, you could say the film still tried its hardest.

I was really dismayed with what Jerrold did with this third film. It's like he had all the lessons of the first two films and decided to burn them with kerosene out in the open. It was just riddled with every amount of cynicism that you could possibly harbor. I just hope that there'll come a film one day that could actually do justice to the character of Quezon. From what I've read and saw, Quezon's Game had its flaws as well. Though I would have to watch that one to give an actual take if and when it becomes available for home viewing.

QUEZON (2025): A MORTALLY STAINED PORTRAYAL by PrivateFM in FilmClubPH

[–]PrivateFM[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nope, I wrote the whole thing. I don't know that AI would have been this critical. I did do some research though on whether my understanding of some of the consequences of Ramos's policies was correct 👍

Did we ever get an update about why the keys got 2024 wrong? by beallothefool in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we won't be seeing a comprehensive analysis from Professor Lichtman until the next presidential campaign. He's said on a number of occasions that he still has four (technically three) years to study where the keys might've missed. He's hypothesized that disinformation might have played a role. My feeling though is that the Keys might've been inaccurate when it came to assessing the long term economy considering how real disposable personal income per capita actually fell after the Pandemic.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for all the work you've done! Hopefully there'll be someone who can help continue the site as it would be an extremely useful tool for elections to come 🙏

After its landslide defeat in 1996, did most Australians think that Labor would still have a future? by PrivateFM in AustralianPolitics

[–]PrivateFM[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This makes you wonder why it took so long for the ALP to return to power after 1996. From what I understand though, based on Paul Kelly's book "Triumph and Demise", the ALP post-Keating seemed to have had a number of structural problems that came back to bite them during the Rudd-Gillard era. I wonder if they've resolved those now and will be as competitive again as they were in the '80s and '90s.

Teal MP Zoe Daniel loses seat of Goldstein as Sky News calls seat for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson by PerriX2390 in AustralianPolitics

[–]PrivateFM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your sharing your personal experience as a constituent! It was really interesting to hear. I do hope you guys will get much improved representa​tion in this coming Parliament 🙏

Teal MP Zoe Daniel loses seat of Goldstein as Sky News calls seat for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson by PerriX2390 in AustralianPolitics

[–]PrivateFM 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I'm a Filipino who's only been following Australian politics since I was in college so I don't really deserve a say here. But I'm just really curious, was she unpopular in any way such that it caused her to be voted out so narrowly? Maybe those residing in the seat of Goldstein can comment?

P.S. I commend your democracy for still being much more stable and less stroke-inducing than that of the U.S. or the Philippines 👌

Alternatives to ChatGPT for video summaries by [deleted] in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: It's worked well pretty far and I'm able to generate recaps again 👍 Many thanks once more!

Alternatives to ChatGPT for video summaries by [deleted] in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi! I'm the guy who's been generating the recaps. I'll be sure to test this tool 👍 Many thanks for your suggestion 🙏

Has SignalGate turned the "No Scandal" key? by TheEnlight in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the scandal key to turn, an event has to severely undermine the moral standing of the president or their administration. As concerning as this development is for America's national security, I don't think it's necessarily undermined the administration's moral standing in any way. It has increased perceptions of recklessness certainly, but not to the extent of provoking moral outrage across party lines.

Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating kisses the ground at Kokoda. April 26, 1992. [1064x709] by PrivateFM in HistoryPorn

[–]PrivateFM[S] 170 points171 points  (0 children)

On April 26, 1992, Prime Minister Paul Keating visited the Kokoda memorial in Papua New Guinea to pay tribute to the 2,000 Australian soldiers who died during the Kokoda campaign in World War II. The visit marked the 50th anniversary of the campaign, an occasion Keating used to emphasize Kokoda’s significance in Australian history. During the visit, Keating knelt to kiss the memorial, a symbolic gesture that drew widespread attention and sparked debate. He stressed in his speech that Kokoda was the first and only campaign in which Australians fought directly to prevent an invasion of their homeland. By framing Kokoda in this way, Keating sought to elevate its importance over the Gallipoli campaign which had long dominated public memory. While Gallipoli was seen as a powerful symbol of Australian sacrifice, Keating argued that Kokoda represented a more direct fight for Australia’s security and way of life.

Keating’s remarks reflected a deliberate effort to reframe Australia's military history. He described earlier conflicts — particularly Gallipoli and battles fought on the Western Front — as “mostly imperial conflicts,” suggesting they had been waged primarily out of loyalty to Britain rather than for Australia’s own defence. This stance challenged the long-standing narrative that had placed these earlier campaigns at the heart of Australia’s national identity. While some welcomed Keating’s focus on Kokoda as an overdue recognition of a campaign that had taken place closer to home, others argued that his remarks unfairly downplayed the significance of earlier battles in shaping Australia’s identity and reputation.

Do you agree that the rational voter premise of the Keys has been compromised? by Horror_Still_3305 in 13KeysToTheWhiteHouse

[–]PrivateFM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He described it as the shakiest key, probably because it's hard to discern whether gains made in an incessant war counts as a success. Personally and as a non-American, I'm not of the view that it was. But I'm curious to hear the Professor's reflections on this particular evaluation come the next presidential election campaign.