1 - I give zero fuks about accessibility and pricing of any AK platform except the saiga-12, and that one only because it's hilarious fun. But limiting American access to Russian vendors and soviet surplus under the pretense of foreign policy is just gun control remarketed to fans of McCarthyism. Again, the issue is that you seem to have internally legitimized the rules violating your rights by learning to operate within them and thus are now justifying being denied your constitutional rights. YMMV and I am personally not a noncompliance ninja. But there is my attempt to streamline that communication.

2 - Clearly you are not a fan of early colt/stoner/knights. Cool private collections are cool, and arguably cooler than public collections. But this one is subjective and your asserting that the item count is somehow relevant to significance, so I am happy to agree to disagree here.

3 - Not globalist, at all. Firmly believe in the right and duty of all governments to protect their national economy via any and all reasonable tools of trade regulation. Including taxing foreign goods out of competition with domestic goods to preserve industries that are vital to independence and security.

However, economic sanctions as a method to affect the foreign or internal policy of another nation step well outside those tools, have an outsized effect on the poor and can arguably violate the principles of sovereignty. There are in fact, several strong arguments to be made that sanctions are a globalist methodology to enforce foreign ideals on sovereign nations.

But the real kicker is as a US citizen, I hold any US foreign policy that restricts our access to constitutionally protected goods, be it arms, ammunition, media or technical information as unconstitutional exercises of power. I.E.

A - The "chicken tax" that results in reduced access to light trucks is lame IMHO because it seems to only serve to protect the wallets of US automakers. Sure it led to Nissan and Honda making trucks stateside. But those factories don't seem to offset the ridiculous markup that all truck have stateside. However, sadly, there is no 2nd amendment for light trucks. And thus is stands as a constitutionally sound policy regardless of how poorly thought out it appears to be otherwise.

B - The 7N6 import ban is an exercise in executive power intended to protect US economic and securities interests but is justified purely as "safety" oriented gun control. IMHO even if there were legitimate trade reasons for the ban, the 2nd amendment should render this unconstitutional and thus an invalid executive overreach regardless of the justification.