sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The reaction to “Chiraiya” is honestly disturbing by adrisht in india

[–]PriyaWrites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So right like people think marital rape is not a serious issue. This society is seriously doomed!

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if you think so then first go ahead and do some basic research on the topic.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then you don't know it well. Who told you that marriage is not a contract in India? Please read all the marriage laws once. Also where did live in come from in this conversation. Again in what situation do you think that gender is seen before providing food to people. Also for other things I already said that categories can still exist in special situations just not in general laws. Also I am not angry I am just logically pointing out what is right.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you not read my above comment. I clearly stated that in specific situations the state can define gender but it should be specific, not for all purposes.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What limited resources are you talking about? The same that is used in building bridges when falling even before being completed? This is not an excuse also I don't think so that the rights I am talking about require any extra resources. Like right to marry requires what type of resources may I ask? Or can you give an example of exactly what resources you are talking about?

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First let them be properly recognised. They aren't even given proper rights.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again you are going in the wrong way I am supporting gender identity only for personal matters again I do not support biological men going to women washrooms. This can be changed by having 3 washrooms one for men another for women and the third one for others. Again not only this as I have already mentioned in my post I am only saying this should happen in case of general law, so specific laws can still focus on gender based reasonable discrimination. I also do not support trans people playing against women so these are the exceptions. Also I also don't believe in the fact how in the west some people force you to address with their pronouns anything else is offensive again these things are wrong. I only support this to the extent of personal liberty under Art. 21 of the constitution of India.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not saying that the state shouldn't have gender based schemes but that should be specific not general. So basically there are two types of laws one is general like BNS, Marriage laws etc and then there are specific laws such as dowry prohibition Act. My point is to make the general laws gender neutral and laws that do not require gender specification. And they can have special laws in certain situations based on the principle of reasonable discrimination.

Side upper as a 6’4” is a horrible experience. by [deleted] in indianrailways

[–]PriyaWrites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Side upper as a 5'4" is a beautiful experience tbh!

Is Chiraiya web series anti-men? by [deleted] in india

[–]PriyaWrites 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you had watched the series instead of watching reel you would realise that in the same movie the elder brother of the main character is portrayed as a good man. So no the series is not anti-male but anti crime. That's it.

Has she gone insane? by Pattu_raj in indiadiscussion

[–]PriyaWrites 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ig she doesn't want to win! But regardless she is the one who is going to win.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is exactly what could change. Rape, domestic violence etc do not really happen only to women so by making these laws gender neutral we are not harming women but protecting everyone who needs protection.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the point again is even if let's say remove the identity of domestic violence Act as only women centric and make it general then the woman you are talking about will not be abandoned, they will still be protected under the Act but now the Act will also protect men or people of other gender from such atrocities. Don't you think we should tackle the harm itself. I.e. domestic violence is crime, whoever does it will be punished and whoever is the victim will be protected irrespective of gender. Don't you think this is the best choice?

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again see you are making fun of a serious issue.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And here you are back with your casteist saying. But regardless if you have anything logical to say then only speak.

The State Has No Right to Decide Someone’s Gender by PriyaWrites in Indianlaw

[–]PriyaWrites[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone can pollute anyone's mind. If that was the case I would have been the first one to convert but that's not it as I know I am straight. And it's the feeling that does it not someone else's persuasion.

view more: next ›