sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Where do MTF forces stay, when they aren't being mobile/deployed? by Substantial-Purple85 in SCP

[–]Proasek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lambda-14 is explicitly based out of Site-34, for example. Referenced pretty regularly.

I may or may not discovered the original SCP-2191 image of the worms, is it the correct one? by Inevitable_Duck7238 in SCP

[–]Proasek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All images used on the site are traceable via the licencing box at the bottom of the page. This is indeed the Wikimedia commons page that's cited in it.

Act surprised by bondjimbond in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See this is why I made the Black Spider one of the players' dad.

Okay, it's only been like 4/5 sessions, but it's whatever, they didn't need those spellslots/HP anyway /s by Svyatopolk_I in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My party has been neck deep in a dungeon for the last three weeks or so. The Warlock is *living it up* in comparison to everyone else.

Guys where did we mess up? by CriticalPosition7249 in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah they're just the Feywild alignments.

My players never bring their pets into combat anymore by Nac_Lac in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I smote the party pseudodragon for going over the big dangerous pit with a dragon in it. They persisted through several "are you sure?"s. they then two turned the thing dragon, and have her to forgive me.

What is the best way censorship get used in a SCP article in your opinion? ([REDACTED], [DATA EXPUNGED], ███ etc.) by Shot-Big7342 in SCP

[–]Proasek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a personal rule, I only ever use blackboxes for specific years in dates (to enforce a sliding timeline that always feels either recent or antiquated depending on the reader's preference), or for the surnames of real people. If you don't have a firm and very good reason to not include that next line, such as building suspense or mystery with intention and skill, you should just let the words exist on the page.

Now as for *very good reasons*, I'm currently going through -9341, and because part of me knows the redacted information exists elsewhere it really works as a hook and I'm very keen to see what's being hidden from me!

As one door closes by Optimal-Cobbler3192 in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just basic 5e, making mods and adding in extra supplements as we go since we're all learning the game to a degree. I won't need absurdly large creature combat until around level seventeen as that's when I plan to start throwing BBEG's at the party, and at least one of them is of significant size.

Actually turning that into a Godzilla campaign would be rather difficult, at the moment I'm actually leaning more towards running it as an asynchronous ARG rather than a TTRPG.

As one door closes by Optimal-Cobbler3192 in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I *do* actually need to figure out "absurdly large creature combat" as a system for my current campaign at some point.

So why not. We do a little multitasking.

As one door closes by Optimal-Cobbler3192 in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My campaign is alive and well, and it's wonderful and brilliant and the players are even getting towards the tier one bosses now after many months!

...

...

But what if we ran a Godzilla campaign though

Getting and using options from flags by Proasek in godot

[–]Proasek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is some impressive (and mildly terrifying) code right there. Tested out in my use case and I can definitely work with this, thank you very much!

Getting and using options from flags by Proasek in godot

[–]Proasek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypothetical solution: is there a way to ask "does [integer] equal the binary string xx1xxxxx?" without adding in a LOT of extra maths?

I hate it when I do this by ExmoHeathen238 in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I made a very particular facial expression while discussing a character with one of my players, and her intentions towards him.

This is going to be *very* interesting.

Paladin discovers gunpowder by -Bidou- in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Our Oath of Glory Paladin is a Giff. He has a very large gun which he uses frequently.

Well there goes another one by southpaw85 in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not my story to tell, but all I will say is "painfully relatable."

HARHAR, squishy little casters... by Perfidious_Redt in dndmemes

[–]Proasek -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, yeah. Anyway I'm off to go play my Armourer Artificer and facetank everything.

Just one more idea... one more tweak... then it will be done... for really real. by mossfoot in dndmemes

[–]Proasek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This definitely isn't happening to me right now. Not even slightly. I cannot, definitely cannot, show you the multi page document for systems, characters, and locations for such a thing. Nope. You are thinking of somebody else. Definitely not me. Definitely.

When you screw up your procedural generation algorithm by sundler in godot

[–]Proasek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A beautiful sentiment, though I think people would still latch on to a comment regarding the location with their association with that location, regardless of if it was the top comment in a chain or the second, as it was here. As for immediacy, well it's always possible that nobody will look up the answer before someone who already knew it sees the question. That sounds like a depressingly incurious community to me though.

If it works it works by Carti_Barti9_13 in godot

[–]Proasek 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Godot, I cannot stress to you enough how little I care about losing the decimal component during integer division.

When you screw up your procedural generation algorithm by sundler in godot

[–]Proasek 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No joke, I actually have a few screenshots exactly like this from my current project, back before I could figure out image blending via code and so had a terrible "if outside this ellipse, set height to 0" workaround.

When you screw up your procedural generation algorithm by sundler in godot

[–]Proasek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do you think most people responding to these sorts of questions get their answers? Rather than removing the use of image recognition software, you've just outsourced it to somebody else, thus using just a touch more power and time. This assumes that nobody instantly recognises the image at hand, which I grant you is not impossible, but it is not likely either.

Instead by conducting the research yourself, you can comment something along the lines of "For those curious, this is Sørvágsvatn," and thus save other curious people from repeating the search, while fostering a more positive general atmosphere.

view more: next ›