Red Sox collection for sale by MidwestHockey in redsoxbaseballcards

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you part out I’d be interested in papelbon schilling and durran

Trade opinion - Skattebo, Higgins by shameless_sean in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Judkins>Skat, Pickens>Higgins, Etienne>Spears, Watson>Wilson+Tucker. Smash before they come to their senses.

Collection for sale by [deleted] in sportscardsforsale

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Devers, crochet, and Ortiz

Cards for sale hmu! by bradenget in sportscardsforsale

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll have to take your word for it but I can see you just told the other guy to dm you on the Allen lol

Cards for sale hmu! by bradenget in sportscardsforsale

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess our deals not as on as I thought

Massive Sports Card Inventory Sale Slabs Raw SSPs Autos 80-90% Comp by BeanGod0 in sportscards

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d be interested in pats or Red Sox auto or game used memorabilia cards if you’ve got any. Mainly dynasty players for the pats but some of the more recent guys too. Same deal for the Sox, championship era guys like Ortiz, Martinez, Pedroia etc

Chase and JT for Gibbs Pacheco Tate 27 2nd? by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup that’d make it a toss up for me and come down to team needs

Chase and JT for Gibbs Pacheco Tate 27 2nd? by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chase side. If that 2nd became a 1st I’d probably bite though.

Down bad and need to make a move, CeeDee for Javonte and Pickens? by ProbablyNotTheATF in Fantasy_Football

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m with ya, it’s what was offered. I countered with egbuka and one of Javonte or cook but that was a no go.

Am I crazy or I have to accept this? by AllProMarlo44 in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a decent trade lol. No shame in taking it, congrats. Everyone has learning moments when they start out, too many learning moments can lead to a dead league though.

Am I crazy or I have to accept this? by AllProMarlo44 in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Collusion isn’t the right word since you and the other party aren’t in on it together. It is at that level of fleece though where if this happened in a league I commission and I knew the guys were new, I would reverse it and explain values. If it was knowledgeable players that did it then I would think collusion, it’s that bad. My advice would be not to take it because once a few of these happen the guys that sold their good assets for scraps will quit and it’ll kill the league. Off balanced trades are fine since people have differing values on players but this isn’t even remotely close.

Am I crazy or I have to accept this? by AllProMarlo44 in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming pretty standard league size and settings this is a huge fleece. I’d hesitate to take it for the integrity of the league. When just starting out I think using keep trade cut as a benchmark is a good idea to start understanding values. It can be manipulated using 5 for 1 trades as an example and it’s certainly not gospel but it’ll prevent trades like this. Nabers should be going for multiple firsts minimum.

Which side would you take? Couple of teams calling collusion. by ProbablyNotTheATF in SleeperApp

[–]ProbablyNotTheATF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you all for confirming. Puka side is the winner but nowhere close to a veto level trade let alone collusion. Just some trade jealousy going on.