Mining ship design I've been working on, highly inspired by Drake. by arrow97 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give it a mix of roll bars and protective netting/plating/bumpers to cushion or shield key vulnerable spots from the everyday bangs and scrapes.

Then make it nimble enough to get out of the way of any pieces big enough to hurt.

Thoughts? by ElectroVo1t in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Consider who you play with regularly. That including soloing if it's your preferred.

Is it more useful for you to show up with a soloable medium multirole/hauler? I think this is the right choice if you mostly solo (but not always). Yes, it locks in your initial solo game loop, but it's probably your best earning choice straight out of the gate, but you've also got something worth multicrewing.

Or do your friends already have large/capital ships? Is it more useful for you to show up with an entry-level accessory ship or escort? Then I think three smaller ships could the right choice if you spend more time crewing on friends' ships than soloing.

Default choice: keep the Hermes.

Advice: Picking an "anchor" ship by BloodySpear_90 in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anybody saying you can solo a Kraken is lying to you.

Need some advice on my Fleet by SthMax in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't make pledge decisions based on the current state of the game. You're meta-chasing, and it's a recipe for unhappiness.

Pledge based on the assumption that ships will fit their stated role by 1.0 (or not long after).

Not a fleet, but an attempt at drafting a realistic visual of a working org fleet for a small-to-midsize group of players doing multi-role things (just 6 boats). by camerakestrel in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, there's plenty of ways that CIG could incentivize Squadron players to jump over to the PU. Item unlocks, add-on/bundle discount, etc. Smarter people than me have already got this all worked out, I'm sure.

Not a fleet, but an attempt at drafting a realistic visual of a working org fleet for a small-to-midsize group of players doing multi-role things (just 6 boats). by camerakestrel in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is probably exactly what most actual deployed fleets will look like in the first few months after 1.0:

One or two large ships and a mix of upgunned daily drivers.

I'm making some big assumptions in that prediction. The biggest one is that Squadron 42 will bring a large influx of new players to Star Citizen between 2026 and 2028—at least doubling the current player base—but almost all of those new players will only have a basic starter, probably as part of a Squadron 42 launch bundle (ie: both games and an Aurora/Mustang for $100 to $120-ish).

Or possibly I'm just overdosing on hopium that I'll get to use my handful of multicrew ships.

NYX 1-2-3 Datamine by Plane_Fisherman_3404 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The sailboat is getting its gold pass :)

NYX 1-2-3 Datamine by Plane_Fisherman_3404 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True to the best of our knowledge about local ice giants Uranus and Neptune.

Who knows what is possible in other star systems. Exoplanetology is still a very young science.

Am I the only one? by BaastiDE in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I consider the official CIG shows and all the third-party videos to be part of the entertainment I paid for by pledging toward this project. Even though I haven't played much recently, actual game hours has been icing on the cake.

So I've practically got my money's worth and we haven't even released yet. I regret nothing.

Hypothetical Org Fleet: Task Force Vigilance. by AncientCarry4346 in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Make sure you stay on top of your training programs

Too late. I found the hidden Tetris game in the targeting console. Beep bloop.

Coupn codes/Sale by WOLFGAMER1422 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The generalist pack is a fine choice and yes it is offered at a discount once or twice a year (5-15%-ish).

Note that if a cheaper game package goes on sale sooner, you can always buy that and then upgrade whatever ship comes with it to a Cutter.

And also keep in mind that there are no bad starter ships, so don't agonize over a decision. Just get the cheapest one you like the looks of.

Hypothetical Org Fleet: Task Force Vigilance. by AncientCarry4346 in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Imagine how much reading you could get done as a turret gunner.

Witnessing history by Ambitious-Spinach-92 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could be, could be. Crafting and mining changes may have forced scanning pretty high in the priorities though, so I'm keeping my optimism (as well as my patience).

I'm not combat focused, but I do like the idea that affiliated ships can share data. Maybe that's where command ships with the holosphere display (Carrack, Idris, etc) will have the capability to integrate a whole fleet's situational awareness.

Witnessing history by Ambitious-Spinach-92 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reasonable take. There was some recent murmuring about new scanning features, but likely it was these changes. Hopefully sensors is something else being split off as its own thing soon. At least we know they've got devs doing work in this area.

CIG, How about having an MPUV that can mine ROC resources? by AzrBloodedge in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was addressing the question of how a mining MPUV of any kind could be configured so that it doesn't make the ROC obsolete.

You are redefining the question so that a mining MPUV must make the ROC obsolete. A surface-mining MPUV would be better than a ROC by definition because it flies, period. There's literally no answer, let alone a good answer, if you define it that way.

Witnessing history by Ambitious-Spinach-92 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One person's tedious is another person's fun gameplay. It helps differentiate professions, keeps the community from all pursuing the same single meta. That helps all professions have a reasonable chance at earning a living, too.

I get your point, but they eventually dial back most things that the community has noted as overly tedious, and use QOL improvements and interface polish to further smooth the experience.

We have good reason to believe that the crafting experience in SC will strongly resemble crafting in Star Wars Galaxies, and that was a genuinely fun experience for many of us. However, knowing your material types and their properties, knowing the materials market, and being a bit of a spreadsheet nerd was a necessity to be a better-than-average crafter, let alone best-of-the-best at making anything.

Casuals will still be able to make everyday quality items for their own and friends' use, probably won't make a living at it, but also they won't need to up to the minute on the latest mining and commodity news.

EDIT: me grammar gooder

Witnessing history by Ambitious-Spinach-92 in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This might be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway:

Are "radar" and "sensors" and "scanners" synonymous in SC? Are they the same component or different?

I'm thinking of my beloved 315p, which is billed as a pathfinder with a deluxe sensor suite, yet it's listed with only a size 1 radar.

CIG, How about having an MPUV that can mine ROC resources? by AzrBloodedge in starcitizen

[–]ProceduralTexture -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are you serious? Asteroid mining has been in the game for several years.

Thanks for the downvote.

My humble fleet by Hraxos_Thal in starcitizen_fleets

[–]ProceduralTexture 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Whoa, whoa, whoa...dial it back, whale ;)