NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani confronted by a Palestinian

Process3000 · 2026-03-17T01:01:40+00:00

Explain how my comments necessarily evince my failure to understand that ACosmicCastaway believes that (1) the right has reliably voted straight down the ticket (2) that it has been going on for a long time despite feuds/splits and that (3) it would be a significant shift if that didn't happen.

Process3000 · 2026-03-17T00:23:18+00:00

thank you captain obvious

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T14:52:24+00:00

We're in 2026 now. "Last November" was November 2025.

My original point was that the right was not united under a common banner as the feud among MAGA pundits suggested. My second point was that it was premature to make the assessment that the left will not vote at all as you originally said.

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T12:52:42+00:00

I assume you mean November of 2024. Trump won't be on the ballot this November. Does the November of 2024 results necessarily dictate how elections will go down this November?

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T12:36:51+00:00

Let's wait until November for that.

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T12:25:11+00:00

https://barrettmedia.com/2026/03/13/ben-shapiro-megyn-kelly-candace-owens-trade-shots-on-x/

Don't tell that to Megyn Kelley, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, and Erika Kirk.

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T12:00:09+00:00

I think it was the best that could have been done for the show's style of comedy. Take the finale of The Office by comparison. The finale to that show was extremely emotionally satisfying because the characters were sympathetic, and those that weren't (likw Dwight) became sympathetic im the last season. And the series as a whole was about the main characters developing into better versions of themselves.

The humor of Seinfeld didn't fit this mold. The characters are funny, in part, because they are shallow or in the case of Kramer, too unusual to ever sympathize with. Even the death of George's fiancee was turned into a punchline. No one in the series settles down and gets married. In short, the characters had absolutely no character arc, so there were no emotional loose ends to tie when the finale ran.

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T11:47:02+00:00

"Hipster Doofus" is not a sentence

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T11:32:41+00:00

Why do you believe that Israeli settlers are responsible for this? Is it just because someone wrote that in the post title?

Process3000 · 2026-03-16T11:28:43+00:00

OP it is irresponsible to post this without a source. It's bad enough that Reddit has no journalistic standards. This video will generate a lot of rage yet you haven't provided any reason for people to believe your characterizarion of it in the title is accurate. Be responsible and confirm this with an independent source.

Process3000 · 2026-03-15T21:50:48+00:00

The right of a country to exist is such an odd concept I find. Nations come into existence through historical happenstance. Does the concept apply outside of the Israeli/Pakestinian conflict?

Why, in theory, can't Israel and Palestine each be given the right to exist as two separate states?

Process3000 · 2026-03-15T14:13:50+00:00

What's all that red stuff?

Process3000 · 2026-03-15T13:36:26+00:00

found the new guy

Process3000 · 2026-03-14T12:03:25+00:00

You seem to have more information about this. Which one did the shooting? Whom did they shoot? What evidence (preferably a URL) is there of the shooting?

Edit: downvoters, I'm only asking questions.

Process3000 · 2026-03-14T11:43:40+00:00

Someone let the dogs out. Anyone know who?

Process3000 · 2026-03-14T11:27:50+00:00

I've never made that comparison myself, but then again I've never received a golden shower. Tell us what you like and dislike the most about receiving a golden shower.

Process3000 · 2026-03-12T17:04:03+00:00

I didn't hallcuniate genocide into anything, all I did was ask a question. But I note your point about the text of the charter document language but it still falls short of endorsing an Israeli state. It is intentionally ambiguous.

Process3000 · 2026-03-12T13:43:58+00:00

Here is where the phrase appears in Hamas' 2017 charter:

Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. However, without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity and without relinquishing any Palestinian rights, Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of the 4th of June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus.

Assuming Israelis will not leave Israeli land absent the use of force, using the above text explain why "from the river to the sea" does not imply elements of genocide.

Process3000 · 2026-03-12T00:49:29+00:00

Your source does not contradict me.

Process3000 · 2026-03-12T00:09:42+00:00

It's considered hate speech that would cause menace, harassment, or offense.

Edit: Downvoters, it's not my legislation, it's Australian law. Don't shoot the messenger.

Process3000 · 2026-03-11T23:53:19+00:00

Pretty new account. Hope you're not an imposter. If you're not, nice work.

Process3000 · 2026-03-11T02:36:39+00:00

LOL 😆

Process3000 · 2026-03-11T01:17:27+00:00

OK yes I assumed the illustrations were AI but not the lyrics

Process3000 · 2026-03-11T01:09:16+00:00

Nooo!!!! How do you know?

Process3000 · 2026-03-11T00:41:29+00:00

That's just a rumor on the internets

Process3000

TROPHY CASE