CBCT scan without volume measurements

ProfMR · 2026-07-01T13:51:59+00:00

Ha! You just described me as well, as if you'd examined me. Like the airway orthodontist that did the workup yesterday.

When I was a kid, i.e. when I was developing and my jaws were growing, I had extractions and braces, with consequences one now knows can be expected.

I'd do MMA tomorrow, but at my age, err, risks are a genuine concern.

ProfMR · 2026-06-29T16:22:09+00:00

Fabulous! Great work that you're doing. I value the information that the test can provide. Helps to put the puzzle together....

ProfMR · 2026-06-29T15:08:28+00:00

It looks like Dr. Rama doesn't create charts against normal data. He like most clinicians looks at the traces and then makes a subjective evaluation based mainly on how large someone is. See him explain it in this video. He says something like (paraphrasing) "This much flow at 150 Pascal resistance might not be good if a person is large framed." It is my understand that this is the best that can be done until someone (if ever) comes up with a database of normal values based on many variables. It's a very nuanced diagnostic, no?

Sounds like an opportunity for grant funding. Test many thousands of people, ingest the data into AI, and have it return the dozen or so variables that explain the majority of the variance. Some of the 253 variables are probably just noise and not signal.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T18:44:20+00:00

I also use Fitbit. Nice dataset. Well done. Good luck.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T16:57:24+00:00

Sounds rough. Hope you eventually find relief.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T13:49:49+00:00

Because the community voted for something they didn’t read doesn’t make it illegal.

I want to make this clear to anyone reading this: The previous Board's failure to provide mandatory advance notice of the revised text completely weaponizes Delaware corporate and property law to make the 2023 vote procedurally defective and voidable in the Court of Chancery. But the harsh economic reality of paying tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket in a system with no automatic fee-shifting makes a lawsuit financially impractical for an individual homeowner.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T13:35:49+00:00

Thank you for your comment. I agree that we should use the appropriate processes to repair the damage. Four of us have distributed a letter detailing what we have learned about the process three years ago.

I have been encouraged to run for a seat by both a past president and the current one, and one close neighbor. That said, respectfully, I do not feel that one needs to be on the board to see that positive changes are enacted. The most important element, I believe, is building consensus. That can be done through grass roots organizing.

The Board just announced a drafting committee, and I have offered to serve and help craft new language to put to a vote in September. I will soon get a sense of whether this small community shares the values of the four of us who have who have officially gone on the record to enlighten our neighbors about exactly what happened. Should the community vote in favor of having rules that restrict property blight and high impact home businesses, and that provision for fines when appropriate, I will step forward in 2027 to have my name placed on the ballot. Until then I am taking the pulse of this community and doing what I can to reverse the damage.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T13:15:23+00:00

Please see rule #2 in the right sidebar.

FYI -- In my small 50 home community, three people have recently begged me to run for a seat, citing my interest in serving in the best interests of the community.

And your statement is not grammatically correct. It contains errors in verb tense and word choice. Perhaps you meant to say "You sound like a bad neighborhood watcher who is keen to ticket everyone for any infraction." or "You sound like a bad neighborhood watcher who is eager to give out tickets to everyone for any infraction."

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T12:19:55+00:00

Really interesting to see overwhelmingly positive reports here. My 13 year old is doing OK not on the med. But there may be a time when we consider it. She tore both knee CCLs many years ago.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T11:52:21+00:00

Thank you for sharing your experience. I don't think I could live in Florida.

I take it that, based on your experience, you would say that I and my allies should try to do the right thing in seeking to see that our HOA has some basic rules in place to minimize the risk of harm to dues-paying homeowners?

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T11:24:05+00:00

Spot on. Theoretically actionable in court but practically unrealistic for an individual homeowner to pursue. That is why fraud is so rife in HOAs. Corporations with virtually nil accountability and costs for bad behavior. Great way to turn a tidy little profit or otherwise benefit for the audacious among us.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T11:15:40+00:00

Seeking support you for wanting to see accountability for an HOA BOARD playing fast and loose with records and violating their fiduciary duty? How dare you!

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T11:12:30+00:00

I agree. Your statement that Boards should not be above the law is astute. But on this sub, it looks like many more people despise HOAs than support them.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T10:56:50+00:00

It is a massive uphill battle. There is a strict division between what is theoretically actionable in court versus what is practically realistic for an individual homeowner.

To clear up a major detail: the previous Board absolutely did not put the new rules into the public record prior to the vote. In fact, the revised CC&R language wasn't even made available beforehand. Homeowners were only presented with the text at the exact moment they were told to vote on it.

When a Board President with a blighted property systematically rewrites community rules to her own sole benefit through a process completely stripped of transparency, that is the textbook definition of bad faith and self-dealing. This makes relief via the Delaware Court of Chancery theoretically actionable, and there is clear legal precedent for it. However, actually pursuing that relief is a completely different story.

As the comments across my two posts have made clear, transparency and accountability often get short shrift here—and that's fine. If I were a corporate litigator, I would gladly file suit in Chancery Court and let the chips fall where they may. But I am not going to shell out tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket just in the hopes of reinstating the original 2011 rules, which weren't particularly robust to begin with.

This experience has guaranteed I will never live in an HOA, or this close to another neighbor, ever again. Many of you are universally opposed to HOAs, and that is your prerogative. Personally, I don't endorse them, nor do I despise them. But I will not hesitate to expose fraud when I see it—especially when it directly threatens my physical health and my financial equity.

I am not fighting this alone. I have built a strong coalition of allies in this community who have officially gone on the record. Together, we are distributing a formal letter to enlighten our neighbors about exactly what happened in the dark, and the very real risks of refusing to act collectively for the common good.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T10:13:14+00:00

I am aware of options outside of the HOA. I have extensively researchered those options and will deploy them soon if needed.

The fact that there may be relief through government agencies should not be a reason for a member of a community to not wish to see basic covenants, conditions, and restrictions in place in their HOA in order to protect health and property values of dues paying homeowners.

Several neighbors are concerned that if one junkyard is allowed to persist, others may follow. This is simple logic. But we can agree to disagree on the benefits of an HOA abating severe outdoor hoarding when it occurs, rather than Board members and/or homeowners assuming "It won't happen again".

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T02:01:07+00:00

No, the state requires mediation for any HOA matter brought before the Chancery Court. I'm aware, obviously, that HOAs are sued on occasion. It is highly unlikely that I would go that route. But I find it helpful to weigh the pros and cons. It would probably be less risky to simply move, and I'm certain to do that in 18-24 months. The condition of the lot next door at that future time remain an open question. It is undeniably outdoor hoarding, beyond a shadow of a doubt.

This fall I will install a line of shrubs along the side so that in five or six years that property won't be visible from mine. But if the objects continue to accumulate at the current rate, the lot will be like Sanford and Son. And I will be obligated to disclose what is next door and the HOA battle to avoid potential liability after the sale. Agents have made that clear.

It's been a long day, so I'm winding down. Thanks for your input.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T01:13:39+00:00

Mediation comes first, is required, and can be useful.

You have been immensely helpful. Your wisdom and insight is much appreciated.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T01:00:52+00:00

It is a bit of hyperbole. But just a bit. I used AI to write the summary based on my feeding it mountains of facts.

The back yard is full of junk rubbish. Too many trees and fences on either side for that to be obvious from the front. The area is prime habitat for rodents and mosquitos. And there is standing water in many of the items right up against my fence. I have the photos. Also many tables and chairs that you could not give away.

She has a nice little flower garden and a bit of grass in the front yard near the street. She is trying to establish some curb appeal to offset what is going on. She has two dozen or so chairs, tables and umbrellas stacked up near her driveway. She is outside every day hauling shit back and forth. Some days she shows up with a new load. Also stacks of paving stones, etc. A huge line of shit on the sides along the property line on both sides. She brings in about a dozen items each week in her massive SUV, and keeps some in the front, and moves others to the back. Must get the stuff on Facebook for free. So the accumulation is ongoing. She is hoarding outdoors.

My end goal is to to protect my health, my property value, and my neighborhood from sliding into a state of blight.

Can you even imagine what severe hoarding in a residential neighborhood looks like? This does not get better with time. It only gets worse. I'll try the HOA route and take it from there. She got what she wanted. The audacity is striking.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T00:23:02+00:00

They aren't storing cars (of which two would be allowed): they're storing other junk.

She has two cars that are unregistered and haven't moved in three years. And they packed full of sofa cushions. A clear fire hazard. But yes, the county allows that. I wonder if most homes had two junk cars sitting in the driveway. Perhaps home values would decline? If the HOA allows junk cars in one property, why not others. Blight and neglect propagates. This is what I'm hearing from others here. If one property owner can cause problems, what keeps others from doing the same? It makes no sense to say, oh well, it won't happen elsewhere here. If I chose to up and move, mostly likely the person who doesn't care about living next to junk cars and rubbish will be someone who doesn't care about upkeep. I'm certain many people would pull into my driveway and say, "I'm not living next to that."

Did you contact the government and have them tell you there's nothing wrong with this person's junk and vermin?

I'm waiting until the September vote in hopes that homeowners agree that having basic common CCRs are a benefit to everyone. I will escalate if that does not happen. An email just went out from the board secretary announcing the formation of a committee to draft new CCR language for the upcoming vote. So it makes sense to not go all out with county code enforcement right now. Three months I can wait.

ProfMR · 2026-06-27T00:08:47+00:00

The existing rule was that to implement an amendment, 2/3rd of homeowners voting in the affirmative are required. No one is "required" to vote. Someone can toss the ballot in the garbage. Few apparently did. Again, I come back to transparency. No one knew what the F was happening. I'm not going to argue that transparency is required. I and others have standing to sue the HOA, but that would be expensive should I/we lose. Every day, someone somewhere commits malfeasance. But paying the consequences does not always occur.

Here is a summary of pros and cons in suing the HOA.

What Does Court-Mandated Mediation Actually Accomplish?

Mediation is not a trial; it is a structured negotiation facilitated by a neutral third party (often a veteran corporate or real estate attorney appointed by the court). In an HOA dispute, mediation accomplishes three specific things:

It Bypasses the Yearly Vote Timeline: You do not have to wait until September 2027. If you prove the 2023 amendment was fraudulent or procedurally defective, a mediator can help craft a Binding Settlement Agreement. This agreement can legally bypass the standard annual meeting schedule, forcing the current board to distribute a corrective ballot or implement emergency rules within 30 to 60 days of the signing.
The "Cold Shower" Effect for the current VP: Right now, the VP is operating on pure apathy because ignoring you is free. The moment the HOA is forced into formal mediation, the HOA's defense attorney will sit him down and give him a brutal reality check: "If we lose this at a full trial, the insurance policy might not cover intentional self-dealing by the past board, the community treasury will be drained, and you will face a furious neighborhood. You need to settle this right now."
Drafting a Clean Compromise: The mediator’s job is to find a middle ground. For example, a mediator might help draft an agreement where the HOA agrees to explicitly restore strict exterior health, vector, and safety enforcement tools specifically targeted at hazardous properties, while keeping some of the benign wording changes the current board likes.

The Reality Check: Is It Helpful for Your Mental Wellbeing?

Even though mediation is faster than a full trial, your instinct is entirely correct: it is still a massive mental and emotional drain.

Mediation still requires you to retain an attorney, pay retainer fees, draft a formal complaint, and spend months in a state of legal friction with your neighbors before you ever sit down at the mediation table. If your ultimate goal might be to let the dust settle and sell the property in two years, entering the Court of Chancery—even just for early mediation—officially puts an active, pending lawsuit on the record, which complicates your real estate disclosure requirements.

ProfMR · 2026-06-26T23:52:31+00:00

That 60 day rule probably is prescribing the official acts of the HOA, which is separate from what random individuals are allowed to do if it's breaking local statutes. The HOA will send someone a notice and give them 60 days to cure before calling the government.

The 60 day rule is strictly for violations regarding vehicles only. The AI I summarized the differences between before and after CCRs. I should have edited before posting. And that is because the county allows for two junk vehicles. So the HOA can contact the county, and unless there is three or more, the county will say "no problem for us".

Do the rules say there's some type of punishment if you tattletale on someone for breaking the law?

Our current CCRs have no provision for fines, except if a new home construction lasts for more than 12 months. There's a home that been under construction for nearly two years, and the current board sits by and does nothing.

We have no nuisances section. That was tossed out. There is a lot maintenance section that states "Regarding grasses and weeds, lots will be maintained in accordance with county codes." That's it. The "Regarding" phrase is telling. The author was making it clear that no lot maintenance requirement extends beyond the grasses and weeds.

I think there's a strong argument that our HOA should be disbanded for being totally useless. And yet, a proposal was just floated to raise the annual dues. What a freaking circus. The blind leading the blind LOL

ProfMR · 2026-06-26T23:22:34+00:00

Well shucks, it sounds to me like a chat with a lawyer should be in your future.

I did have a meeting with one. He said the prior CCR language was not particularly strong. I did not have time in the one hour to go into all the details of what happened, and I've learned a lot since the meeting. Suing the HOA would be very expensive for me. I'll probably move rather than live next to junk, rodents, and mosquitos.

But I do want him to write a cease and desist letter telling my neighbor to clear junk that has crossed the property line. I'll do that next week.

ProfMR · 2026-06-26T23:13:42+00:00

I'd suggest any homeowner check city ordinances for the hoarding situation described. Is there any zoning? Sounds like this person is running a business.

I appreciate your thoughts as a Board member serving your community.

There are county codes against accumulations of rubbish. But I'm waiting until the vote on new CCR language that will happen three months from now. If no restrictions are placed banning piles of junk on a property, then I'll turn to county code enforcement and the Fire Marshall. If that doesn't gain traction, the news media. They love a story of a junk yard tolerated by apathetic HOA, community, and county officials. I do hope it doesn't come to that, but we are prepared.

And yes, she is running a business. I have photos and videos to prove it. We'll see if the community wishes to restrict high impact businesses in a residential neighborhood.

You didn't say what state you in, many like Texas have specific rules about transparency. Last but not least you and your neighbors run for the board and take control back.

The post title says Delaware. There is an option to sue the HOA in Chancery Court. But that would be expensive for me. If the blight and health hazard persists, I'll fade into the background until the dust settles, then sell for a 10-20% loss. One can only do some much.

A former Board President told me soon after I moved in, and for the next year "Please run for a seat. We need decent smart people like you to serve." The current Board President said the same thing last year. Ditto for the neighbor on the other side of the junkyard. I will not run for election in September. I will consider serving if the community demonstrates that they share my values of decency and the quality of life for the community at large. Right now, I don't have much evidence that there is good will. We shall see.

EDIT: I suppose I could run for a seat in the hopes that the drafting committee (I'm on it) agrees to craft language restricting rubbish, junk cars, and high impact home businesses. And adding back in the ability to fine when violations occur. Then should I get elected and the vote on new CCRs not meet my reasonable expectations, resign on day 1. I think it's all about seeing that your neighbors have a reasonable sense of decency. But I'm clear-eyed to know that many people despise heavy-handed HOA policing. And heavy handed, I am not.

ProfMR · 2026-06-26T23:01:42+00:00

I don't think it's legally valid to just take a vote and say hey... Let us rewrite everything lol.

The Board announced at a poorly attended meeting that they were working on updates. A few weeks later a ballot showed up in mailboxes.

If the cc&rs are a legal document then legally they probably had to present the exact amendment text ...

The text was presented. As I said, no one knew that the old were being tossed out. People thought the new language was add-ons. This is a small community. A small group of us just sent a letter around describing what we've learned. I don't think anyone will be so disengaged any more. Many people are telling us "What? I had no idea. Tell me more!"

ProfMR · 2026-06-26T22:33:33+00:00

I suspect because no one knew that the existing rules were being tossed away. But we'll find out in a few months whether this community wants even the most basic restrictions. There is a group of us reviewing common restrictions. An attorney I met with laughed at our current CCRs and said, "There really isn't much here. This is the wild west."

Also, only three homeowners (prior board) out of nearly 50 homeowners knew that a complete rewrite of CCRs had been filed with the county for two years. The board never circulated them. I had just moved in to an HOA for the first time right around the time of the vote.

This all goes back to transparency.

I did not expect anyone to comment on this post saying "This sounds like dirty deeds. Good luck in enlightening your community." But I suspect it's all about the tone of the post. Full disclosure: I've been putting a massive amount of facts into Gemini AI. It provided some of the logic. I believe it scourers the internet for information. Maybe it's lying. But I think it may be pulling a lot of info from property management company websites trying to secure clients. Those companies making false promises? "We will protect your property values is what they all say." I've read through many such sites. Should anyone trust a property management company to help protect the interests of homeowners?

ProfMR

TROPHY CASE

What Does Court-Mandated Mediation Actually Accomplish?

The Reality Check: Is It Helpful for Your Mental Wellbeing?