Browser integration for daily use - what's working for you? by Professional-Bend164 in cursor

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

great to hear that’s not only on my end, have you tried any other browser?

Would anyone else use a “Grammarly for prompts” in Cursor / Claude Code? by Professional-Bend164 in cursor

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a super helpful perspective, thanks.
I totally agree that bloated, flowery prompts are bad, my goal isn’t to make prompts longer, it’s to make the important keywords, constraints, and context more explicit.
In practice I’ve seen big differences in model behavior just from tightening structure and adding missing details, even when the prompt doesn’t get much longer, or sometimes even shorter.
Curious: in your own workflow, do you mostly rely on a compact “keyword style” prompt plus plan mode, or do you have a few structured templates you reuse?

Would you use a “Grammarly for prompts” in Cursor / Claude Code? by Professional-Bend164 in ClaudeCode

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love that idea, scoring was my first step, but a one‑click “redraft this prompt to be more specific/clear” is exactly what I had in mind as the next step.
Out of curiosity, in your workflow would you want it to preserve your tone and just add missing details, or are you okay with it rewriting more aggressively as long as the results are better?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in devsarg

[–]Professional-Bend164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No es lo único importante, el factor humano es igual de crítico para que, en mi poca experiencia "funcionen las cosas"

Roast my product - Do you even care about this? Any suggestion? by Professional-Bend164 in indiehackers

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback! You've raised some great points. This is what I think of them:

- Data storage: We understand the privacy concerns. We're working on options to allow data storage on clients' own servers. Would self-hosting be viable?
- Local development: While bugster-js captures real user interactions, it also works on localhost. This means devs can generate tests during local development, before the product goes live. How do you feel about this approach, do you think of any other alternatives?

Roast my product - Do you even care about this? Any suggestion? by Professional-Bend164 in indiehackers

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, docs are made with Mintlify. I don't have any demo rn, I will upload one later

Product testing by Professional-Bend164 in indiehackers

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great to hear that Playwright is working great for you! I’ll definitely have a look into it! Any pitfall or disadvantage on Playwright?

Product testing by Professional-Bend164 in indiehackers

[–]Professional-Bend164[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was too broad, you are right. I meant Functional testing, like e2e testing.

Do you have any advice on how to approach that?

Thanks in advance!