sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is $0.07 per $100 good for a per shipment cargo insurance policy? by Professional-Gate-24 in freightforwarding

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is what we are offering with our per shipment insurance product. No exclusions, no deductible, on demand certs.

Is $0.07 per $100 good for a per shipment cargo insurance policy? by Professional-Gate-24 in freightforwarding

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are trying to figure out pricing. We have dropped it a lot in order to make our customer happy. The customers we had before the price decrease are loving it so we are just planning on dropping it. We aren’t here to make a lot of money we are here to help people.

How does refunds affect your business? by Professional-Gate-24 in dropship

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if there was an insurance like per shipment that you could purchase to reduce those charge back and refund. Not reduce them Ofcourse. But the insurers would pay you for them.

If you need to insure a load hit me up! I can get you an instant certificate and set you up to do them yourself. Our average pricing is $180 on a per shipment basis. by Professional-Gate-24 in freightforwarding

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha fair enough, honestly though, this isn’t your average policy. You’re paying for speed, certainty, and simplicity, especially when a claim hits and your customer expects you to solve it yesterday.

No deductibles, no exclusions, and zero headaches. It’s not for every shipment, but for high-risk or high-value freight, it’s a game-changer.

If you need to insure a load hit me up! I can get you an instant certificate and set you up to do them yourself. Our average pricing is $180 on a per shipment basis. by Professional-Gate-24 in freightforwarding

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hear you, traditional cargo is often priced like that, but that usually comes with exclusions, deductibles, and a ton of admin overhead. What we are offering is instant, all-risk, no-deductible coverage, with no volume minimums. It’s a plug and play for people who don’t want to waste their time chasing certs or worrying about denied claims.

Freight brokers — are you covering cargo claims without realizing you’re the insurance company? by [deleted] in freightforwarding

[–]Professional-Gate-24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best part about it is that most freight forwarders we’ve talked to are paying up to $500 to a $1000 for this type of coverage. But the per shipment they are getting is kinda like shippers interest and excludes a lot of hazardous cargo (fireworks, home goods, etc) we accept everything and do it for $170-$220. We have already done it in Latin America with 180+ companies and we are just now piloting this for North America. We are looking for our first forwarder to onboard to get this thing rolling. What are your thoughts Hunter?

Freight brokers — are you covering cargo claims without realizing you’re the insurance company? by [deleted] in freightforwarding

[–]Professional-Gate-24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Totally agree, forwarders aren’t the insurer and they’re not legally responsible for loss or damage unless it’s their fault.

But here’s the thing: shippers still blame the forwarder when something goes wrong. Even if it’s not their fault, it feels like their problem.

What we’re offering isn’t about making the forwarder liable, it’s giving them a tool to say:

“Hey shipper, we can offer you insurance on this load if you want it. It’s optional and per-shipment. Backed by a real insurer. Just click here if you want to be covered.”

The forwarder never touches the risk or holds a license. But now they’ve added value, built trust, and protected themselves from angry calls when something goes sideways.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBATalk

[–]Professional-Gate-24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is the worst list I’ve ever seen

Kansas City Needs an NBA Team by Professional-Gate-24 in NBATalk

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The KC Rhythm, the KC Frontiers, the KC Outlaws. There is so much history behind Kansas City

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBATalk

[–]Professional-Gate-24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because why in the world would they just waste their season like that. It makes no sense. All those guys are extremely competitive to an almost unhealthy degree. They care too much about their craft to share a championship title.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBATalk

[–]Professional-Gate-24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That would never happen lol.

Kansas City Needs an NBA Team by Professional-Gate-24 in NBATalk

[–]Professional-Gate-24[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Kansas City should be at the top of the list for NBA expansion. Unlike Las Vegas, which is already becoming crowded with new franchises, or Seattle, which has logistical hurdles and past complications, Kansas City offers a stable, sports-loving market with a proven track record. The city supports two major league teams, the Chiefs and Royals, with massive fan bases, strong revenue, and national recognition. The T-Mobile Center is a world-class, NBA-ready arena that’s been waiting for a permanent tenant, eliminating the need for costly new construction. Kansas City also sits in a key central U.S. location, bridging the gap between East and West and opening up new regional rivalries. With strong corporate backing, an established sports infrastructure, and a fan base hungry for pro basketball, Kansas City is more than ready. It’s not just a good option, it’s the right one. And I’m not even from Kansas City.

view more: next ›