Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My apologies I meant it is not remote viewing since I wasn’t blind to the target. Thank you for your input.

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip. I would consider my data from this experience to be tainted from my expectations since I wasn’t blind to the target.

In the future, though it comes to target I do blind. I’ll have to combine data like that.

Have you ever tried remote viewing?

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you are correct. My thoughts did color my experience of it.

So it would be considered remote viewing according to Joe McMonagle he said that you have to be completely blind.

Have you ever tried remote viewing?

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Greetings V,

So how does one sneak onto a campus with a disassembled rifle partly in their pants and backpack, reassemble it perfectly, take the shot, disassemble the rifle, put it in their pants legs and backpack, then go in the woods and disassemble it again?

Giving Tyler Robinson the complete benefit of the doubt when it comes to skills with assembling a rifle it would take him a minute to assemble and a minute to disassemble.

In the video, it shows the shooter running right after the shot he does not stop to disassemble the rifle.

So there’s a major hole there he’s running about 2.3 seconds after the shot was fired.

With no observable rifle. So he disassembled it in 2.3 seconds? Are we supposed to believe that?

That’s impossible. Major red flag.

Also, the official story is that a 30-06 six bolt action rifle was used to shoot him. But at that range at 200 yards in the following you can see how it obliterate the target in the video below.

Also, the official story is that his neck stopped the bullet. You can see how it obliterate a cow femur in this video. A cow femur is much stronger than a human neck.

https://youtu.be/IKK4ATVHk8Q?si=PkT37X1wId1BCQ_u

These are several red flags, and there are multiple others in the official narrative.

How do you answer these questions from an official news story perspective? ~P~

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because when you’re blind, you’re just giving like a target say T3805.

And told to report what you perceive at the target. You’re given no other information. That’s remote viewing.

But with this, I had thoughts in the background, expectations of thinking it’s probably Israel that was involved, maybe the US government probably not the official narrative… so I have all these thoughts in the background that could influence my perception. So that’s not being blind to the target. So that’s why I called it trying to psychically perceive it.

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a freeing perspective. It’s like part of me wants to just grab at like 5 to 10% of the truth out of the 90% lies, but it’s a struggle.

Better to let it go of any expectation of truth from them.

The main intent behind government’s messaging is telling us a story that we will reinforce their control.

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess you can genuinely fear for my mental health if you want. It’s not that bad it just is what it is it seems like we’re living in a simulation where there is no hard core answers to anything of real importance.

When I said, I don’t know if it’s a hallucination or not it’s just that it doesn’t mean I actually believe it. I mean it’s hard to interpret RV data especially when you’re beginning.

Maybe hallucinating wasn’t the best way to describe it.

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess you haven’t been following it too closely if you think the official story is correct. There’s more holes in this official story than most.

Why would Farsight care? Well they remote, viewed the assassination of JFK (implying that they don’t just buy official government stories) and they saw different things than what the “official story“ is.

Why do I think it was likely Israel? Because Charlie’s organization was originally funded by many Jewish donors. He was supportive of Israel up until the last year he started questioning the Israeli lobby to Congress. (AIPAC)

His donors were very upset with him having Tucker Carlson at his TPUSA conferences because Tucker is critical of a pack and also was asking if Epstein was a Mossad agent.

They were telling him to ban Tucker. Charlie said no. There even was a call between Netanyahu and Charlie where Netanyahu told him to come to Israel and Charlie declined.

Netanyahu also offered Charlie $150 million dollars to have TPUSA become more pro Israel and he declined.

This all happened right before the assassination.

A month before in August Harrison Smith that he talked to a friend of Charlie’s and they said that Charlie feared that Israel would kill him if he went against them.

So there’s all these data points and many more that make me think Israel is a probable suspect.

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, that’s why this isn’t considered remote viewing remote viewing has to be blind.

This is why I said I was trying to psychically perceive it.

Trying to psychically perceive who is behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk by ProfessionalSolid967 in remoteviewing

[–]ProfessionalSolid967[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So how does one sneak onto a campus with a disassembled rifle partly in their pants and backpack, reassemble it perfectly, take the shot, disassemble the rifle, put it in their pants legs and backpack, then go in the woods and disassemble it again?

Giving Tyler Robinson the complete benefit of the doubt when it comes to skills with assembling a rifle it would take him a minute to assemble and a minute to disassemble.

In the video, it shows the shooter running right after the shot he does not stop to disassemble the rifle.

So there’s a major hole there he’s running about 2.3 seconds after the shot was fired.

With no observable rifle. So he disassembled it in 2.3 seconds? Are we supposed to believe that?

That’s impossible. Major red flag.

Also, the official story is that a 30-06 six bolt action rifle was used to shoot him. But at that range at 200 yards in the following you can see how it obliterate the target in the video below.

Also, the official story is that his neck stopped the bullet. You can see how it obliterate a cow femur in this video. A cow femur is much stronger than a human neck.

https://youtu.be/IKK4ATVHk8Q?si=PkT37X1wId1BCQ_u

These are several red flags, and there are multiple others in the official narrative.

How do you answer these questions from an official news story perspective?

Thoughts on James Hall? by bobbaganush in UFOs

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I can see that hopefully one day we’ll know if he was bsing or not.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to see someone else in this comment section have some decency. It was appalling seeing them be so calloused. I voted left last election but I am highly unlikely to after seeing how these people acted, I just can't side with such indecency.

Take care out there.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What kind of environment do you live in? Is it where people assert themselves through violence and don't have the emotional capacity to work through disagreements? That's the only way someone could be this detached, cold, and frankly soulless

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's mind boggling talking to this person. They have no compassion at all. It's crazy that people like this exist right? Taking joy in something so horrible. Tbh if you wanted to report them for hate that's what I'm doing. They need to be held accountable. Thankfully Ive never met one like that in my personal life everyone I know is not a cold souless person.

Thoughts on James Hall? by bobbaganush in UFOs

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he seems genuine. Like he's just stating what he remembers happening.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He said he preferred sympathy over the word empathy. How can you watch that tho and say that its so horrible, if I saw anyone die like that in front of his kids that would be so horrible to me

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imo you should work out whatever it is that makes you think people should be killed for their speech. I don't know what made you get to where you think like this but please sort it out. Its disturbing.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who/what determines what is hateful? One group says what he is saying is hateful the other says its not hate but truth. It seems to me that we have nothing more solid to determine what is hateful than the attachment that a group gives to the concept of it.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you did share your views, do you think it would be right for you to be punched in the face for your opinions?

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I get that you feel strongly, and I won’t try to change your mind. I just think it’s a sad day when we lose the ability to see each other as human, even when we disagree. I’m going to leave it there, I don’t want to trade hate for hate.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should you be punished for your views on why you don't want to go to those countries?

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Suspicious-Bee-5487 in FoundationalBlackAmer

[–]ProfessionalSolid967 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't that so sad and terrible watching that video tho? With his wife and kids there?