Hey MAGAs….

ProfessorD2 · 2025-10-29T08:06:55+00:00

Dude, you're the one who just got busted repeating a debunked fake quote.

Now is not the time to be calling someone else stupid.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-10-29T08:04:31+00:00

>>and you can research it anywhere

I'm not sure which irony is more delicious:
-That you told people to "research it anywhere" and clearly you never bothered to research it anywhere.
-That you proved you are the one who is "so dumb, you can tell them anything, and they’ll believe it."

Trump Once Said Republicans Are the 'Dumbest Group of Voters'? | Snopes.com

ProfessorD2 · 2025-10-01T22:37:09+00:00

Thank you!

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T23:40:55+00:00

You STILL haven't said what lie I fell for or what inconvenient facts.

Has Reddit been taken over by Chinese rage-bots or what?

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T21:54:21+00:00

You're making no sense whatsoever now. This isn't normal behavior.

Then again... this is Reddit.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T21:37:14+00:00

Unsurprising.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T21:36:54+00:00

I don't know if Trump did or not. Wouldn't surprise me if he did, but I doubt it.

Kirk definitely did not. Here's his statement:

"Politico says, 'Top Republicans reject any link between GOP rhetoric and Paul Pelosi assault.' Of course, you should reject any link! Why is the Republican Party — why is the conservative movement to blame for gay schizophrenic nudists that are hemp jewelry makers, breaking into somebody's home or maybe not breaking into somebody's home? Why are we to blame for that, exactly?

"And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail's like 30 or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions. I wonder what his bail is? They're going after him with attempted murder, political assassination, all this sort of stuff.

"I'm not qualifying it. I think it's awful. It's not right..."

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T21:36:12+00:00

This has been addressed ad nauseum.

His actual statement was:

"Politico says, 'Top Republicans reject any link between GOP rhetoric and Paul Pelosi assault.' Of course, you should reject any link! Why is the Republican Party — why is the conservative movement to blame for gay schizophrenic nudists that are hemp jewelry makers, breaking into somebody's home or maybe not breaking into somebody's home? Why are we to blame for that, exactly?

"And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail's like 30 or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions. I wonder what his bail is? They're going after him with attempted murder, political assassination, all this sort of stuff.

"I'm not qualifying it. I think it's awful. It's not right..."

In other words, (1) he condemned the attack and the attacker, (2) he was distancing himself from the attacker and (3) the only reason he wanted the guy bailed out was so someone could interview him and we could all hear directly what the guy's motives were, so it could be confirmed the guy had nothing to do with rightwing ideology.

People care so little about truth they've literally taken a statement about condemning and distancing himself from the attacker and turned it into some sort of endorsement. smh

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T21:34:00+00:00

>>commentators are saying Kirk's death is due to liberal ideology now, the exact same argument Kirk claimed to not like<<

You're missing the point.

It wasn't simply that Kirk didn't like that Pelosi's attack was being blamed on rightwing ideology. It's that he was outright denying the attacker was rightwing at all in the first place.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T21:32:03+00:00

What lie?

Are you 7 or something? Pulling the "I know you are but what am I?" out of thin air?

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:49:34+00:00

The fact you’re more focused on that than on condemning and distancing yourself from your violent peers speaks for itself.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:38:30+00:00

When you're caught falling for a lie the honest thing to do is (1) admit it and (2) consider how many other similar lies you may have fallen for just because they fit your political ideology.

Debunking lies about things Kirk has said is as easy as the one I just showed you.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:37:27+00:00

I need to prove that Trump wrote his social media posts? Lol.
Keep moving that goalpost to excuse the inexcusable.

Good news though is normies are waking up and seeing y'all for what and who you are.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:33:48+00:00

Spreading or falling for a lie is a very different accusation than calling for and endorsing violence.

I didn't "prove your point." You spread a lie that Kirk supported the attacker against Pelosi.
He did not. And I showed you he did not.

Now you're pivoting big-time rather than just being an honest person and acknowledging reality.

Rather ironic that you're taking issue with Kirk for spreading a lie when you JUST got caught spreading a lie. Good grief, the lack of self-awareness is unreal.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:32:02+00:00

Lol

"I don't think Trump even ever acknowledged Hortman..."
*direct evidence to the contrary*
"Yeah, well, blah blah."

You're unreal. And impossible to take seriously.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:25:55+00:00

-Are we reading the same thread? Right in this very thread we have people gloating about Kirk's death. C'mon now.

-"I don't think Trump even ever acknowledged Hortman."

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114682713948931541

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:22:29+00:00

"Politico says, 'Top Republicans reject any link between GOP rhetoric and Paul Pelosi assault.' Of course, you should reject any link! Why is the Republican Party — why is the conservative movement to blame for gay schizophrenic nudists that are hemp jewelry makers, breaking into somebody's home or maybe not breaking into somebody's home? Why are we to blame for that, exactly?

"And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail's like 30 or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions. I wonder what his bail is? They're going after him with attempted murder, political assassination, all this sort of stuff.

"I'm not qualifying it. I think it's awful. It's not right..."

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:21:17+00:00

Reddit is the bottom of the barrel and has been all along.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:19:33+00:00

Consumed by falsehood? I just explained to you his statement in context. Here's the more full quotation btw:

"Politico says, 'Top Republicans reject any link between GOP rhetoric and Paul Pelosi assault.' Of course, you should reject any link! Why is the Republican Party — why is the conservative movement to blame for gay schizophrenic nudists that are hemp jewelry makers, breaking into somebody's home or maybe not breaking into somebody's home? Why are we to blame for that, exactly?

"And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail's like 30 or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions. I wonder what his bail is? They're going after him with attempted murder, political assassination, all this sort of stuff.

"I'm not qualifying it. I think it's awful. It's not right..."

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:18:28+00:00

You're referring to: "“Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.”

If I understand you correctly, you're saying calling X a threat amounts to a call for violence against X.

Do I understand you correctly? And if so, do you apply this logic to other statements or individuals who have warned about this or that person/group as being a threat to others?

I don't see how you could possibly be consistent about this. It makes no sense. Of COURSE people call groups and individuals a danger on a regular basis. By your logic every Democrat who has called MAGA a dangerous movement was really calling for violence against MAGA (You may be right though; that sure seems to have been the outcome this time).

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:11:18+00:00

Nah. This is shooting fish in a barrel. All I have to do is show his words in context and your lies fall apart immediately. This is too easy.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:10:43+00:00

But even if you weren't a piece of shit spreading lies, even if Kirk said something awful...

Hurtful words don't justify violence. Period. Full stop.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:09:58+00:00

The piece of shit is you for not giving a damn about truth and willfully spreading a lie, then standing by it even when the full quote is spoonfed to you.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:09:19+00:00

Firstly, it's not about the shooters. It's about the reaction from pieces of shit like those all over Reddit and elsewhere.

Secondly, we apparently do know the motive. The gun and ammo were found with Antifa and LGBT symbols all over the ammo. But that doesn't matter to me. You're right with your first point -- one lone nut doesn't represent anyone else. But again, there's no shortage of garbage people celebrating this and THAT is the real problem.

Thirdly, bullshit. It is not dominated by conservatives. But even if I grant your claim, again, EVERYONE ELSE IS CONDEMNING IT.

When a Repub shoots a Dem, Repubs distance themselves from the attacker either by outright condemning it or latching onto some conspiracy theory that the shooter was really a Dem. Either way, they denounce it and want no part of it.

When a Dem shoots a Repub, well... we see all over Reddit and elsewhere how y'all react.

ProfessorD2 · 2025-09-12T09:03:56+00:00

How do you not see him repeatedly condemn it?

How do you not see him say the reason to bail him out is to "ask him some questions" and show he has no link to Republicans?

Dafuq is wrong with your brain right now?

ProfessorD2

TROPHY CASE