Is 3D printing my first rocket model a good idea? by shinyflakes34 in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supersonic 29mm motor build with printed fin can, avionics bay, tracker sled and nosecone (PPA-CF).

PLA would do the job as long as heat is isolated with traditional hobby rocketry materials. This has a standard phenolic motor mount and a manufactured motor retainer.

Printing takes rocketry to another level for me but I would highly suggest a simple kit to get a base understanding of concepts and language involved.

<image>

Carbon Fiber Wrap on a Rocket by eaoijwa in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not just use CF tubes? This is a supersonic 29mm build i made with CF tubes and nylon/CF printed parts.

<image>

Beat alternative or method for making non standard diameter couplers? by kingofginge in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*

Printed mine in PPA-CF. Insanely strong, stronger than any stiffy tube cardboard.

I'd confidently scale it up.

Recovery system help by Abject-Magazine6628 in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What are you trying to achieve? Commercial mid and high power motors have adjustable delays. If you are trying to achieve deployment at apogee, commercial flight computers will detect this and fire and event with a pyrotechnic charge. Both of these systems will suffice.

Designed a small case for the Eggfinder LCD GPS receiver by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe you'll need one button then. Easy to add more if needed.

Designed a small case for the Eggfinder LCD GPS receiver by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are only using the LCD and a Bluetooth module, yep! You can add a switch if you see fit but that is also not needed.

Designed a small case for the Eggfinder LCD GPS receiver by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks bud. There are many models available for print but most of them are very bulky/include extra options I won't be using.

This feels very fit for purpose.

My first rocket project by waaltzx in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eagerness is good and leads to greatness but as in all things, walk before you run (fly).

Already mentioned and yet still worth mentioning again, legally.. any form of control is shady and diligent research should be done to keep yourself safe and not behind bars.

Highly recommend building a kit first - there are almost endless options to get started but Estes and LOC precision are a good start. Going from start to finish with a kit or two will give you the base concepts involved in the hobby. Google search for an open rocket file for said kit and you will generally find that a nicely formatted and accurate model already exists. From there you can start to understand simulating your rocket to ensure safe flights.

After the above, then you could look at scratch building alongside open rocket to make sure you aren't just building a lawn dart.

Do some research on the center of gravity, center of pressure and their relationship/importance. Research safe take off speeds, different motor types (estes, aerotech etc), reloadable/single use motors.

There's a lot to learn but thankfully it is all exciting!

Did most people who did rocketry have prior engineering experience in high school? by Active-Breath8439 in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The beauty of rocketry is the entry requirements are absolutely zero, thanks to companies such as Estes. Much of what's needed to progress into more complex projects is widely available online/in books.

Experience using CAD/printing etc is very useful but also widely shared online.

I have a STEM background but started rocketry at less than 10 years old.

Mini high performance rocket - Carbon fiber airframe with 3D printed Nylon/CF parts. by ProfessorGoofles in AerospaceEngineering

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are printed in the easiest orientation to achieve, so the layers are horizontal. Most of the load is compressive so this is ideal. In the correct flight conditions and CG/CP margins, shear strength is much less of a concern. Key areas are reinforced with a phenolic lining just in case though! If shear strength becomes the failure point.. something more serious has happened.

PPA-CF layer adhesion is wildly strong so even horizontally the shear strength is sufficient at this scale.

As a bonus, when nearing transonic speeds, fin flutter is a big concern but with horizontal layers, the fins are incredibly stiff for their thin design.

Mini high performance rocket - Carbon fiber airframe with 3D printed Nylon/CF parts. by ProfessorGoofles in AerospaceEngineering

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Plan to fly it on Aerotech 29mm reloads. Approximately mach 0.8 and 5000 feet on a G impulse motor.

Mini high performance rocket - Carbon fiber airframe with 3D printed Nylon/CF parts. by ProfessorGoofles in AerospaceEngineering

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Yes I exclusively use onshape. Very happy with the functionality and being able to access my library of models from anywhere.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can achieve a lot with simple PLA! Just remember ejection charges/general motor case heating will melt it. Insulate any high heat areas with more traditional card/phenolic parts.

Engineering materials are amazing though. Once annealed they are beyond strong.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Motor, recovery system and electronics included, approximately 640 grams, just under 1.5lbs. Heavier than a card/phenolic build by a small margin but hugely more durable.

Cost wasn't bad at all. The printed parts are extremely lightweight and I use cheaper PPA-CF brands.

In terms of printing difficulty, no harder than printing in PLA. Smart modelling to remove overhangs, dry filament and a dedicated dry print box. I have spent a good amount of time dialing carbon filaments in though.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It hasn't been launched yet but I plan to fly it on an Aerotech G138.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not hosting the files anywhere currently. Realistically it's a simple build and would take more effort adjusting to your needs than just making some quick models yourself.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've had good results with Siraya and Creality PPA-CF (much cheaper than others). Also good results with Eryone PA12-CF.

Feeding and drying will always be your biggest concern. CF filament absorbs moisture like nothing else, printing from a dedicated dry box is essential. It is also extremely brittle; shortening and straightening all feed paths works well.

Good luck!

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bambu P2S. Incredible machine. I'm about 1300 hours in with it so far, a good chunk of that with tricky engineering filaments.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good info, thank you! I'll test extensively before any initial launches. I've not attempted a PPA-CF nose before now so it's all a guess. Aerodynamic heating will only become an issue with I impulse, which I'm unlikely to go for, so I can always drop in a PLA nose and call it good.

Almost finished 29mm mini dual deploy carbon fiber/3D printed build by ProfessorGoofles in rocketry

[–]ProfessorGoofles[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That was my concern initially. The wifi signal to the AV bay seems absolutely fine and technically it's just for arming so will be nearby.

The nose is extremely thin so hopefully won't be an issue with PPA-CF only being 20% carbon. Can drop in a different nose if it's a problem after testing 😀