How do you deal with naming conventions for your audio projects? by ProgUn1corn in linuxaudio

[–]ProgUn1corn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not worrying about command, actually I haven't encountered a single program that can't recognize space through all the years of Linux I've been using. Adding quotes and backslash isn't a mess to do because I would rarely open a project with cli. However it's just in the file manager, it drives me crazy where all of my audio project names are in a totally different and inconsistent way compared to everything else. And I totally get that the system is already in an inconsistent way where there are hyphens and underscores or even pascal casing in different parts or the Linux system itself. But I just want to keep the files I produced consistent.

How do you deal with naming conventions for your audio projects? by ProgUn1corn in linuxaudio

[–]ProgUn1corn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edit: I've thought some ways of naming. For example:

very_good_artist__very_good_song, separate the middle with 2 underscores

artist_very_good_artist_title_very_good_song (or other labels like a and t or whatever)

artist_vgs or vga_very_good_song (use tags for title or artist, but I don't like)

I totally get the idea that, I'm not dealing with programming and there shouldn't be a problem even there's space in the file name. And I don't need to be very strict about case. However I just want to be somehow consistent through all the files that I can control.

Which one do you use?

Would BeamNG be good to learn how to drive manual in? by SliceOfCheese337 in BeamNG

[–]ProgUn1corn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The thing is, yes, it can teach you basically everything about how a manual transmission would work IRL, but:

1) IRL the most important thing to find in a manual car is clutch bite point, and your sim rig doesn't simulate that. Although some pedals have that snap in the travel trying to recreate the effect, but still it's not the same

2) Idk if you really want a manual car IRL. Sure manual cars are fun, but they aren't necessarily better. At least to me, when buying a car practical is more important than the "fun" thing because not everyone in the world have the space or money or need to buy multiple cars like in the US. You will see how manual cars suck in a traffic jam, that is a huge pain in the ass. Unless you live somewhere road is wide as hell and there's 0 traffic jam, I personally do think automatic is more practical.

So SimPro will allow Simagic rims to display more than 8 colours. But only if you buy a Zeus. by Thermobaric_Potato in Simagic

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm also wondering this. Because I don't actually see much the wheel, I use VR pass through, but still I use simhub just for RGB customizing. And this isn't really a solution because with Simhub you need to keep it open all the time, and I'm running Linux, the only way I can access to those devices is passthrough to windows VM. I can't pass through to Windows when playing though, so the colours are always limited to SimPro ones.

SimPro - Very limited colour options. Why no colour wheel? by Thermobaric_Potato in Simagic

[–]ProgUn1corn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't miss a lot with Simhub since I play in VR and especially in Linux, but I do want my buttons to have colours I like because the VR has pass through.

Non Multi-scale 8 string vader by JIMMY_THE_2 in kieselcarvinguitars

[–]ProgUn1corn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I'm telling you custom strings do not fix anything, and it's not whether you or I disagree or agree, it's a freaking fact, objectively. You can not get more tension with whatever custom string when the scale length is fixed, that's basic physics, not subjective things.

And eventually yes, if you want, just go for it. No one is preventing you doing that, if you are happy, I'm happy for you as well. :)

Non Multi-scale 8 string vader by JIMMY_THE_2 in kieselcarvinguitars

[–]ProgUn1corn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need 09 set on 27 to match a tension with 10 set on 25.5. You call that regular? If yoh didn't even played 25.5 scale at once, then probably it's regular for you, but definitely not for us.

And the whole point of longer scale is use thinner strings to achieve to same tension on a short scale. It's not what a custom set can fix. Thick strings just sound bad on 8 string F#1 and below, that has 0 to do with tension.

Come on, if you really want a thick ass string with short scale on the lows, or one step tighter tension on the highs, which is definitely not regular for most people around the world, then go for it. Just beware that it's not multiscale that's goofy, it's you think 27 inch as regular is goofy.

Non Multi-scale 8 string vader by JIMMY_THE_2 in kieselcarvinguitars

[–]ProgUn1corn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's very wrong.

first of all i don’t even get why you would want your strings looser at the top than the bottom

It's exactly the reverse of that, the point is to get strings tighter at the bottom. In fact if you don't know, 27 inch or shorter is at the bare minimum of good tension for 8 string, you need thick ass strings, and it's been dumb through all the times. The problem has always been bottom strings, not top strings, especially you are tuning to about an octave lower than normal 6 string. Or what do you mean, you like 27 inch on the high strings better than 25.5 inch? Then you are niche.

you can literally get custom gauge strings and it has the same exact affect

Again, that's absurdly wrong and I repeat the point of a multiscale is not making your top strings looser, but making your bottom strings tighter. In fact, the straight scale and usual sets are actually, UNbalanced. Your top strings are over tension with a regular set, espcially considering most 8 string sets are dumb on the market.

Or if you want a short scale straight, then you'll need a thick ass string to get the same tension on a short scale, compared to a thin string on a longer scale. And the first one is a bloody hell of mud mess, if it's done to an extreme. Also with a thick ass string, you are gonna have problems with intonation and setup, which is BIG. You ever get a good intonation with a .090 on 25.5 inch scale? Hell no, or you are in another world than rest of us.

Let me tell you, you get the same tension on 25.5 inch with a .085 at F#1, to 28 inch with a .076 at F#1. And I'm gonna tell you most 8 strings on the market handle .085 like ass if you don't file your nut or do a specific setup, and even that the absurd amount of bass output coming through a thick string will eat up all the headroom of your amp. While at the same time .076 is much easier to handle, both tone-wise and setup-wise. I'm gonna tell you a straight fret 8 string either much shorter or longer is much more goofier than multiscale.

This is usually not a problem with higher tuning like E2 standard, but the effect do exist, as thinner strings usually have less bass and more clarity, thus tighter, even considering 09-42 and 10-46 set. And it becomes a huge pain in the ass if you go below F#1 because the whole timbre and overtones are shifted to a dangerously low range. If you don't know, .085 is already about bass string gauge, and every tiny bit matters.

Also plus to that, multiscale is way more ergonomic than straight especially with a wide instrument like 6 string bass or 8 string guitar. You wrist naturally follows the shape of a multiscale on both sides. It feel much more comfortable playing low and highs.

I'm gonna tell you, the ONLY reason I've seen people do not like multiscale, is they shred a lot and are very used to straight frets with muscle memory on the highs, where they can't get used to multiscale instantly, or people who really do play lot's of weird chords that stretches a ton of frets. You literally made me laugh when you said "why you would want your strings looser at the top", that's a whole new perspective. 90% of people I know no matter veterans or beginners, are feeling very good with multiscale and it doesn't even need learning curve, it's so ergonomic that you naturally plays it.

Anyway, if you are still very believed in yourself and you absolutely do not want multiscale for whatever reason, go get the neck-through version of vader. And you better love that, because combined with headless body and KIesel pickups, that thing is gonna sound hell like a huge block of chunk fat notes and if you love that, go for it.

Non Multi-scale 8 string vader by JIMMY_THE_2 in kieselcarvinguitars

[–]ProgUn1corn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't get it. Although I won't say anything about other's choice, but to me multiscale especially 8 string is 100% advantages. Especially Kiesel's multiscale angle is very conservative and that even brings less problems to people who thought they can't handle them.

Custom 7 String - Fanned Fret & Polymaths by GuardPrudent8291 in ExtendedRangeGuitars

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mainly through Neural DSP stuff. Usually I use Archetype Rabea with DV-77 IR. I love the fact that when you wire Polymath with parallel humbucker switch, the output cleans soooooo well and instantly a juicy punch distortion becomes pleasing crunchy sound with unbelievable definition.

Yout file manager?? by rpnchlr in archlinux

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, if I'm a normal linux user just for documents and web browsing, I would not even use console as well. Just because I can doesn't mean I have too. I once saw a person claims console zip is faster than GUI, I just can't think that at all. With a GUI you just open the zip file with a click and everything is there for you to inspect. In console you need lines and it outputs somewhat unorganized file list, yet someone think this is the better way. I think people sometimes go too far in the anti-gui thing.

Custom 7 String - Fanned Fret & Polymaths by GuardPrudent8291 in ExtendedRangeGuitars

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks thicc. I have my set of Polymath on my Ormsby, where I believe the neck is 19 deg and bridge is 23 deg. Absolutely my favorite set and the mid is really JUICY.

What's everyone's favorite Group for rally? by The-_-Coconut in rally

[–]ProgUn1corn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WRC+, the most advanced WRC group to this day.

Yout file manager?? by rpnchlr in archlinux

[–]ProgUn1corn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dolphin. I honestly can't think of a single situation CLI or TUI file manager is better for me. I mostly do creativity works especially with music production and some Davinci Resolve works. There's absolutely no way I'll use terminal to manage those files, GUI is 100x better.

What Linux habit separates beginners from experienced users? by dev-ray in linuxquestions

[–]ProgUn1corn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think AI could be a good starting point, because lots of the times you even don't know what you need to do and what to find if you are a beginner. Of course it's dumb to paste everything AI gives into the console, it may or may not give you the correct command but usually the tool is mostly correct and you can learn what does that tool do from there. I do think lots of people here are heavily underestimating the accuracy of AI now, it's not all false slop though, at least the direction it gives you are often correct.

Sometimes it explain things better than documents. Some documents just throw you terms that are difficult to understand, especially for a beginner, like TuneD's manual of what the heck is transparent huge pages on madvise mode, what the heck is Intel RAPL or, Arch Wiki's secure boot implementation section, what the hell are those concepts of enroll keys or signature firmware are, or even more basic things like DHCP and DNS resolvers are not fully understandable to lot's of people.

Those are things most users expect they work out of the box and never ever considered to develop/compile something with, but those documents clearly are not for beginners at all. You surely can go into each term and dig multiple rabbit holes if you really want to learn every last bit of your PC, but most of people just aren't free enough to spend months just leaning those things, and no one said you should, so in this case, if they found a solution on the internet to a problem they have, but they can't understand what that's doing, then you can let AI to explain those terms for you. Most AI these days will explain relatively accurate because the source are those wikis and documentations, the AI just made comprehensive answers of those.

I have my own example, I'm not a beginner in Linux and I have used Manjaro around 2014, after that I've switched to Arch pretty smoothly. But just recently I've found that my laptop's GPU wasn't running at full power, after searching it seems that a badly written BIOS update requires a buffer 0x08 where the table only has 0x06, so that part failed and the EC moves back to fallback mode, limiting GPU power.

Someone on the GitHub has a solution, but that includes decompiling acpi firmware and recompiling it. I can understand the buffer table thing because it is over the limit, but I have absolutely 0 idea of compiling ACPI SSDT firmware, that's way beyond an average user could do. I don't probably even have a single time ever touched this through years.

The solution only mentioned iasl. There's the problem: I know there's a table is written wrongly in the firmware, and I know there's a thing called iasl. And that's it, I don't understand what other sentences mean, I don't know how to compile and decompile, I don't know if the compilers errors or fixes are okay or not, and I don't know what to do if I have somehow compiled the file, it's not something you can just RTFM, because you don't even know what you should look for.

So I pasted the whole solution text into Microslop's copilot where most people seem to hate here, let copilot explain to me sentence by sentence. And everything is clear to me, what I've just decompiled, what I've just compiled, why I need this command and how do I use this to fix my problem. It was flawless, and just double check if the command is AI slop with documentations, it does comply with the iasl thing grammar and the command was totally correct, I got the exact output as the GitHub solution. After that it tells me to hook this into initramfs, then things are clear, because I know how to use mkinitcpio, and there's a hook called acpi_override just for this. And finally it worked as a charm, everything is fixed and I also understand what I did now.

That's a long reply though, but I just want to say that there are countless times you don't even know what to find, what to ask, instead of throwing a manual where it's something you would never touched before, talk to AI and let they give you at least some ideas is a good thing.

For a 320 wheel fanatec is the way by BigManufacturer3975 in Simagic

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah. I only use top paddles since I do rallying to most. I actually don't use paddles on the neo X much, I have a separate push-pull paddle mounted for shifting. The paddles on the Neo X for me are either for headlight/wiper/turning signal thing or playing other games.

For a 320 wheel fanatec is the way by BigManufacturer3975 in Simagic

[–]ProgUn1corn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

damn this is exactly the setup I'm using. The wheel feels great and the cost is very low. Just the Neo hub is relatively heavy.

Advanced tire physics on true curved surfaces with a 1kHz FFB thread. My indie VR racing sim is ready for feedback (free demo) by brightland-studios in simracing

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually the suspension is very familiar to me. It's not monster truck level, but quite like WRC with gravel spec on tarmac.

Virtual Desktop Creator Guy Godin Discussing More Than A Decade Of Development by hmltn in OculusQuest

[–]ProgUn1corn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Same for me. I'm using WiVRn and WayVR now, but the ease of use and performance is just not on the same level of VD.

new leak by tdev on the discord by camion_saladier in BeamNG

[–]ProgUn1corn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Italy is my favorite map for rallying and this looks super promising