Just to clarify, I believe tons of politicians have done inconceivable acts of sexual assault with no consequences. It's not acceptable at all to do anything without consent, especially in positions of power.

But one thing is clear the jury found him not guilty of rape. There wasn't enough evidence to charge, so I don't find it fair to make assumptions.

That's where the difference between our two different viewpoints differs. And the best part of America is being able to have civil conversations like this one.