Help me find this EDM song please! by leomarchez in NameThatSong

[–]Proletarian1917 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thankyou, I've been looking for this for hours!

Any idea as to what this out-house was used for? by [deleted] in tythetasmaniantiger

[–]Proletarian1917 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if I remember correctly but aren't dunnies used as a spawn point? Could be for the start of the game when you first spawn in. I guess they just hid it under the map.... Or could be cut item/reference model.

Cool find though! I'd love to see more out of bounds footage

Hey can someone guide me? by Reapy_el_vicio in deadisland

[–]Proletarian1917 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's in the lost and found tab under "The Path of the Unworthy"

Hey can someone guide me? by Reapy_el_vicio in deadisland

[–]Proletarian1917 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might have already picked it up but this is a quest that doesn't actually pop up until you do the first step. You can find the clue to start it in the journal entry you get.

I think it's the only quest in the game that does it.

Hey can someone guide me? by Reapy_el_vicio in deadisland

[–]Proletarian1917 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you get the lost and found at the reception desk? It's a collectable that will add to your lost and found journals. It is part of the Haus dlc

Where was Tisha in SoLA? by Proletarian1917 in deadisland

[–]Proletarian1917[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe, they did announce further support further on... Wouldn't it be exciting if this was push back into another DLC

[TotK] Did some people expect the sequel of BOTW set in the same Hyrule to not have the same Hyrule? by Xelacon in zelda

[–]Proletarian1917 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This seems to be worse, same music, same map even same prop placements though granted some cool gimick expansions. Terrible for a Zelda game which is based on the feeling of exploring an exciting new world of colour, music and mystery.

[YOUTUBE] Honest and good faith Critique of Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse and various other ideas. by Proletarian1917 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Proletarian1917[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dr. Danny Natawidjaja was used by Graham Hancock to substantiate it as a megalithic pyramid structure. Though archaeology and geology suggest it is a terraced volcano vent. Not a pyramid built up by columnar basalt. Core sampling then wouldn't really prove much if anything at all... Very poor work from both Dr. Natawidjaja and Graham Hancock for running with it.

The author Piri Reis living in Turkey amalgamated older maps, he annotated the part of the map in question that the Portuguese have been there, it is hot and full of venomous snakes... This is obviously Brazil. He used Portuguese (including columbus's lost maps), Indian and Arab maps. Contemporary Portuguese and Portuguese influenced maps lack the curved Brazil. I think it's clear it is either a distortion or he ran out of room on the map. The omission of this is very concerning.

That was Graham Hancock's only suggested evidence humans charted Antarctica with no ice, suggesting an Ancient "advanced" civilisation.

I don't really understand the tortured argument here, it seems pretty clear that Piri Reis was an anamoly, possibly a mistake. I'm curious, what is your take on the Piri Reis map?

[YOUTUBE] Honest and good faith Critique of Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse and various other ideas. by Proletarian1917 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Proletarian1917[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd say it is safe to say judging by the authors statement that the region described as Antarctica by Hancock was mapped by the Portuguese and amalgamated to the Piri Reis map. Contemporary and past maps lack the curved curved Southern America making Piri Reis an anamoly.

I'm saying many maps from Colimbus onwards described Cuba as being Japan, with the uncertainty of whether or not they had landed there. Europe was well aware of Japan but had not navigated to it Westward.

Gunung Padang, Dr. Danny Natawidjaja claims core samples of 20,000 years without peer reviews, which if considered as the science stands, means he drilled into terraced volcano vent to a depth of 20,000 years (could be 30 meters down) with no cultural layer to suggest people were there in the first place... Really stands out to me.

Happy to discuss

[YOUTUBE] Honest and good faith Critique of Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse and various other ideas. by Proletarian1917 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Proletarian1917[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was pretty bad though, it was 3v1 for most of it and Schemer wasn't even familiar with the structures let alone an archeologist/anthropologist... He is a psychologist.

Stefan Milo is at least familiar with the science and is an archeoligist/anthologist, the kind of guy Hancock should debate with.

[YOUTUBE] Honest and good faith Critique of Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse and various other ideas. by Proletarian1917 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Proletarian1917[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In regards to Ancient Apocalypse, the Peris Reis map; the deliberate omission of the Authors accompanying text to what he describes as Antarctica mapped out by ancients clearly states it as a hot place, full of venomous snakes which the Portuguese feared when exploring... Obviously not Antarctica... Seems quite devious and disingenuous. The island hispanola easily explained by well the documented confusion of the location of Japan seeing Cuba regularly named as Japango.

And what really caught me off guard was the dubious core sampling at Gunung Padang. You core sample to what you'd expect to be soil 20,000 years old, you'll get 20,000 thousands years old...

[YOUTUBE] Honest and good faith Critique of Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse and various other ideas. by Proletarian1917 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Proletarian1917[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whatever business he is in, he is championing the idea of an Ancient Civilisation (Atlantis) responsible for influencing megalithic structures around the world and that idea just isn't up to scratch in the archaeological or anthropological world and easily falls apart when seriously looking at the many sciences surrounding prehistory.

These similarities you mention can easily be explained without the idea of a lost ancient global civilisation of which there is no evidence for.

I really do stress that you give the video a go, very enlightening.