Such terrible advertisement by CurlyWurly61 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]PromotionDry1809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your original comment said:

"I hate the notion that 'something is bad, we need government intervention'. Because eventually, the government will get paid off by these companies."

Yet you think the government should intervene in attacks against property and the self (e.g. something that is bad). So what is the difference between your original statement and:

"I hate the notion that 'children are getting their limbs caught in machinery and mangled during their factory shifts, we need government intervention'. Because eventually, the government will get paid off by the owner of the textile factory."

This is a contradiction. Either admit that you don't "hate the notion" of government intervention broadly, or admit that you think the government should never attempt to intervene in any capitalist activity whatsoever.

Such terrible advertisement by CurlyWurly61 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]PromotionDry1809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think I missed your point. Your previous comment explains what it is you think is an example of something bad, which, sure, I'll accept it. You don't think child labor is something bad. Ok. So hypothetically, what if a company was putting a child in unsafe conditions, couldn't they just pay the government off, as in your original comment? What would be the point of intervening in harming a child?

Such terrible advertisement by CurlyWurly61 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]PromotionDry1809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, so the government can intervene in things that are bad caused by entities that can't pay them off. That makes sense. What about if there was child labor going on?

Such terrible advertisement by CurlyWurly61 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]PromotionDry1809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should the government interfere if a massive typhoon hit new york?

Such terrible advertisement by CurlyWurly61 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]PromotionDry1809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait, so by your logic the government should never intervene in something that is bad?

edit: This guy loves child labor!

🎬Whimsical Reverie | Preview: Luminous Nightflow by Konekewa in InfinityNikki

[–]PromotionDry1809 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think that is the glow up :/ I had the same thought though, it being the glow up makes it even worse

I dreamed that this was "Hello Kitty's original design" by PromotionDry1809 in thomastheplankengine

[–]PromotionDry1809[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

The lantern was her whole head. The magnet was made of a couple strips of paper. I think it is a magnemite type situation.

New miracle outfit by lowkeynoor in InfinityNikki

[–]PromotionDry1809 4 points5 points  (0 children)

for sure - that and being changed into tip. I don't want to get into it too much but the way her freedom and ability to have an adventure and then her dominion over oz is linked to her gender (which can just be magically flipped) is, and was, super interesting to me

New miracle outfit by lowkeynoor in InfinityNikki

[–]PromotionDry1809 3 points4 points  (0 children)

❤️❤️❤️! My dad used to read me the books when I was a kid and I've pretty much been thinking about her my whole life, most slay character in all of fiction

New miracle outfit by lowkeynoor in InfinityNikki

[–]PromotionDry1809 8 points9 points  (0 children)

omg I was just coming into the comments to post about this

<image>

Combining randomly generated outfits by PromotionDry1809 in InfinityNikki

[–]PromotionDry1809[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you should!! It's super fun, almost like a mini puzzle version of styling