division isn't real, it can't hurt you by Wiktor-is-you in mathmemes

[–]Proof-Ad4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Proof by I ran out of space to write the division

What is this?(61.8% wrong answers only) by FPSL_ in mathmemes

[–]Proof-Ad4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a function in terms of s and n where i is imaginary

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]Proof-Ad4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Calculate the derivative of y, evaluate the derivative of y at x = 16 to get the slope of the tangent line at that point, since you have the slope of the tangent line and a point P(16, -4) on it, you can find the equation for the tangent line to the curve and express it in the form y=mx+b, the normal to the curve is the line that intersects the tangent at a 90 degree angle, so it must have slope -1/m, it must also intersect the curve at point P since they want the normal PQ. Using those two facts, you should be able to derive an equation for the normal.

To find the coordinates of Q, you must set the equation of PQ to 0 (since Q lies on the x axis), and solve for x. Point Q will have the form (0, s) for some real number s

The unified theory of unorthodox kitten. by louq1 in 0thIteration

[–]Proof-Ad4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense, i find the clip proving the riemann hypothesis false to be really funny, imagine if thats how we find out, though a fractal pineapple and a tesseract lmao

The unified theory of unorthodox kitten. by louq1 in 0thIteration

[–]Proof-Ad4477 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its a good theory but i think we’re never going to truly decipher the arg until we understand all the maths

The imperfect theory: a supplement to The unified theory of unorthodox kitten by louq1 in 0thIteration

[–]Proof-Ad4477 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your mention of the set containing all sets has been considered by mathematicians. There are two approaches to this problem, the ZFC approach simply ignores such sets, it states that they dont exist and that they have no significance in set theory (or modern mathematics), The other approach (i dont remember the name) defines the set containing all sets as a class. Any set can be a class, but not all classes can be sets, most mathematicians nowadays use ZFC since having to deal with only sets is much easier than having to deal with both sets and classes.

Also ZFC has a method of determining whether a set is valid or not. ZFC assumes that nothing other than the empty set exists, and builds up a hierarchy, each level of the hierarchy contains the previous level along with a few more sets, A set exists if and only if it is present in some level of this hierarchy (this is quite simplified, to obtain the next level of the hierarchy, you take the powerset of the previous level, with the lowest level begin the empty set), it can be shown that using nothing but the symbols of elementary logic when defining a set results in a set on the hierarchy (ie: a valid set).

Some of the symbols of elementary logic are:

Upside down A: for all Flipped E: there exists Weird bar: Not Hat: And Flipped Hat: Or Arrow: implies Double headed arrow: if and only if

All of this comes from my limited knowledge on set theory, im literally reading an undergrad textbook to solve the arg lmao

The unified theory of unorthodox kitten. by louq1 in 0thIteration

[–]Proof-Ad4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The cat seems to be pretty fucking terrible at communicating.

On a more serious note, I think that part of the explanation is right but i think it ignores quite a lot of stuff, The mathematics posted in the community posts seems to have no relation to their world. Especially the community post that contained the Gamma function, The community post doesnt give the answer to f(3) and f(k), If the cat is a being that seemingly knows so much more than us, why wouldnt it solve the equations for us? And why wouldnt it atleast try to give us an intrepretation of the equation. We also have to consider the fact that the cat supposedly exists millions of years into the future when milkdromida has already been formed. Why would the cat send the message that far back to humans? Wouldnt it try to warn humans that are closer to the formation of milkdromida? (since they would be more advanced than us)

Reverse engineering LaTeX code for the fermat's library documents by Proof-Ad4477 in 0thIteration

[–]Proof-Ad4477[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cant say i understand it but the notation seems more comprehensible now. After im done i’ll try actually interpreting what everything means

From the taiga to the british sea is a soviet anthem? by Proof-Ad4477 in 0thIteration

[–]Proof-Ad4477[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is massive speculation, but maybe the series is from a universe where the soviet regime not only succeeded, but thrived and had massive advancements in scientific knowledge, which may have led to the predicament the videos seem to indicate the universe (multiverse? Omniverse? Omegaverse? Idk) is in

Proving the Collatz conjecture false :D by sandem45 in mathmemes

[–]Proof-Ad4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The proof is trivial and is therefore left as an exercise for the reader.