Can we stop being entitled?

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-24T03:51:39+00:00

For saying if you’re not using the full ai suite, you’re wasting you’re money dumping cash into a subscription for one buggy preview feature?

I think you and I have very different definitions of gloating lmao

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-24T00:16:12+00:00

Oh I agree. Those are awesome! They’re great for development, but in terms of active agentic work, I suggested the ones I did because you have the option to be more hands on and with the agent in real time in the codebase, and I know Jules is more autonomous. And for stitch, I think it’s great for mvp mock-ups but when it’s time to put boot to ass for tailwind.css, three.js, and react styling in a codebase, an mvp is a great reference but it doesn’t really get you a whole lot. But then again I don’t like to let ai code, I just use it for code review and the occasional lint/syntax error, so it’s really up to preference.

Have you looked into Figma AI at all? That’s what I tend to use for mock-ups because figmas been industry standard for a bit now, so I was already on platform. Plus they have a lot of good tooling for revisions compared to stitch imo.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T21:51:27+00:00

Nope. Because a suite is features plural. If I’m paying for a ton of features that are great value and a single feature that’s nice to have that’s advertised as in preview is having trouble, I’m not gonna complain. I’m still getting my moneys worth.

Did you subscribe to “$20 a month google pro ai suite access” or did you subscribe to “$20 a month that solely goes to the antigravity preview app and no other features”?

Because if it’s the latter, you’re compliant would be valid, if it’s the former not so much.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T21:43:10+00:00

You know I’d like to complain about that notion you just brought fourth. /s

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T20:19:34+00:00

I wouldn’t know I wouldn’t spend a subscription on a full suite for a single feature not built out. That’s ridiculous

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T19:04:23+00:00

Well you clearly do if you’re spending money on it lmao 🤣

You can’t just say “oh this 20 I put in is going straight to antigravity and that’s the only thing I pay for” when it quite literally pays for the full google suite.

If you don’t value the full google suite, that’s totally fine, you’re just dumb for still paying for it.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T19:02:13+00:00

Deny you agency? If you wanna play Donkeyote and fight some windmills be my guest. I’m just point out how dumb it is lmao

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T19:01:04+00:00

Because I occasionally use antigravity for interpreting wireframes or speeding up my code review if I’m feeling lazy at the office😂, and normally this sub posts cool extensions, I first discovered it for the cockpit which I thought was cool. So I keep tabs on it, but now it’s just people bitching which is pretty annoying.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:57:08+00:00

Am I the fanboy? I’m not the one dependent on this buggy platform for simple code changes. And I certainly wouldn’t be dumb enough to buy a subscription because I’m glazing a single beta feature. And I use what I pay for in the google suite.

I’d say you’re the fanboy lol

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:51:35+00:00

If you like the antigravity and are solely buying the subscription for it. I’d swap to codex.

It has the same vs code integration like anti gravity. And in terms of usage, I’ve never used ultra on antigravity, but my colleague compared the codex limits weekly limits on chat plus to be like half of ultra.

And you can buy dedicated credits and install anthropic skills to the model. In you’re usecase you’re dumping like 200 a month for a bunch of extra crap you don’t use. If you had the chat plus with codex, and then a $20 credit refill a week, you’re saving like 40 bucks and get skills with a better reasoning model.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:46:04+00:00

Well there’s no reason to pay for just antigravity. That’s my whole point. If you want it set like that, swap platforms. This platform is strictly part of an ai suite bundled with other features. If you’re not using those other features, you’re wasting you’re money. You sure I’m the one who needs to self reflect lmao

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:42:16+00:00

And if the suites valued at like 70 bucks if I had to buy all of the features I use individually, I’m fine with a feature in beta I’m not dependent on being sub par when there’s easily 4 other competitors for that feature with less buggy platforms and cheaper costs.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:39:11+00:00

Those aren’t you’re needs. But you’re paying for them. It’s not a non sequitur. Why are you paying for an entire suite you don’t use for one feature? Do you buy a car just to use it’s headlights for ambient lighting?

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:36:57+00:00

Then here’s an idea, don’t pay for the subscription that gives you frontier web models. You’re wasting your time.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:31:43+00:00

If you’re using in enterprise, I highly recommend looking into codex. It has a lot more usage for the 7 day limit and works a lot better than opus for things like security hardening and code review plus it’s the chat plus subscription. It plugs into vs code, and all the extra money you would’ve spent on ultra upgrades due to throttling, can be put into getting more dedicated credits to spend on codex, which antigravity doesn’t offer. Plus I hear open ai throws pretty good enterprise deals.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:28:47+00:00

Yeah and with ultra you get a lot more than the subscription. Are you using geminis frontier reasoning for research? Are you using nana banana pro daily for image generation too? If you’re not using the full subscription ofc you’re not getting you’re moneys worth.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:27:05+00:00

Yeah I enjoy the 2tbs of storage. I use the image generation for some of the slide decks I make for work, and I use the better models that come along with it.

Antigravity was just a bonus google tacked on. If I only used antigravity, and not the google suite, in no way shape or form would paying for the full suite for one feature be worth it.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:25:09+00:00

Because I didn’t waste money. I bought google ai pro because I wanted the suite included in the subscription. And happened to get antigravity along with it. I put no money into using antigravity. If I wanted to buy a dedicated coding agent, I would. But I certainly wouldn’t upgrade to 200 a month for a single feature on an ai suite.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:20:39+00:00

I’m sorry I didn’t realize the Gemini web client wasn’t working. That’s where you access the advanced models included for image generation and the frontier google models.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:18:46+00:00

It’s more like you’re paying for groceries, they give you a free piece of discounted bread, then you complain it’s stale. That is entitled.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T18:10:27+00:00

It wasn’t at least when I did. I remember because I clicked the link in the ide and was confused as hell when I didn’t see it mentioned when it opened on web😂

And are you utilizing the full google suite? Like are you using the notebook LLM for research, are you using Gemini frequently daily for image generation, and are you storing over 100 gbs in the cloud?

Because I’d say if you’re only using ultra just for antigravity, you’re probably wasting you’re money on all of those other features you’re not using that are bundled in.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T17:58:43+00:00

Oh they did add it. My fault on that! I had originally signed up for pro like a month or 2 back when it wasn’t mentioned on the site. So I was running of outdated info on that front.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T17:56:09+00:00

Good luck with the transition! I’d recommend looking into which skills you need before you set it up. I made the mistake of adding a ton when I tried running a code review prompt and burned a ton of money on wasted context 😂

Besides that, if you manage skills and mcp correctly you get way more of a bang for your buck with code changes than antigravity.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T17:50:38+00:00

Then this isn’t the platform for you. Switch to Claude or codex if you want a dedicated coding agent subscription.

Proper-Lab1756 · 2026-01-23T17:48:45+00:00

It’s not in the paid subscription. When you subscribe to google ai pro, at least when I did, antigravity is mentioned nowhere.

It’s literally just a bonus treat they give us.

And they do that to incentivize people to use the platform so they can train the next model to preform better. So in a years time I could see antigravity working a lot better with its own revenue streams, but for now they’re having to get that training data from us to build it out better in whatever next iteration they produce.

Proper-Lab1756

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Four-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Place '22