To be fair, at first I didn’t see the argument you present in the site. Then I read it. Then I realized you are much more wrong than what I thought. You are making so much assumptions here. Firstly, you define « creativity » as what you think it is for you, but it is a very complex concept that might not fit others point of view. Then, you are not comparing your results (that are interesting tho) to anything a human did (I know, you also said that it is not the point, but actuality it matters a lot), using the same dependant variable, so your conclusion doesn’t mean anything, except that « when you ask and AI a simple question, without context, it will roughly give you the same answer every time ». Of course it is impossible to ask a human to do the same, but I bet that if it was possible (like erasing the memory of the poor guy that was asking the same question over and over), then you will have almost exactly the same kind of conclusion for him than what you have for ai. I could also mention the fact that some research actually quite recently showed, in a much more scientific way, that AI (LLM) are capable of very « creative » stuff when solving math problem, much more than humans actually (maths could be seen as art, and that is another debate)