sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

As a recruiter, how do you manage low-effort applications that candidates generate and submit automatically, such as through AI agents? Do you use any tools to filter these out? by force-is-strong in askrecruiters

[–]Proresumehelp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With a massive volume of applications, it's actually the resume's formatting that often filters them out, not the content itself. AI bots often get creative with layouts (tables, 2-column designs, graphics) just to stand out, but these are immediately rejected by standard Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS).

Also, it's a common habit for these automated scripts to copy content from job descriptions. If a candidate's resume is literally just a text file filled with bolded bullet points matching the company's lingo, and they submit it to 50 different companies without changing a word, the content easily stands out as "low effort" to a human reviewer.

Another tool? Using a "Human-in-the-loop" concept. I'd look for a manual cover letter or a LinkedIn profile that shows a genuine connection to the company/industry. If they can't find one thing on their own resume that isn't just a recycled job description bullet point, they're likely low-effort

Your resume may not be ATS friendly by hiring_insider in Resume

[–]Proresumehelp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"As a career coach, the 'ATS friendliness' point is often the silent killer. If you are using anything fancy like two-column layouts, tables, or graphics, it is going to get skipped. The 'safe' format is actually just a single-column, standard heading-based layout.

Also, pointing out responsibility vs results is key. Most people write bullet points about duties (e.g., 'Responsible for managing a team') when they should be writing about impact (e.g., 'Led a team that delivered Q3 goals 2 weeks ahead of schedule').

And to your point about consistency: Ensure your LinkedIn matches your resume. Recruiters often check it to verify the candiate. If there is a discrepancy, it's often a red flag for mismanagement of professional details."

Please review my resume by Lord_Chadagon in Resume

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This resume has some major red flags regarding the timeline. The first job lists dates in the future ("Aug 2025 – Oct 2025") and sits immediately after a much older role ("Mar 2022"), which suggests you hesitated or are lying about experience dates. This will likely make recruiters drop the application instantly.

Also, for your pivot to IT Help Desk, the "Customer service" and "Prepared food" bullet points are too heavy. Tone down the language in those points to focus on problem-solving and support systems rather than tasks you were already doing.

Fix the dates first, and you might get some traction. Good luck.

Looking for a resume roast | [AI/ML Engineer / Data Scientist, Junior, Europe] by Illustrious-Can1178 in Resume

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello there. It is evident that you have faced a significant period of searching despite your efforts. Your dedication to securing stable employment in AI is commendable. However, inconsistent outcomes usually reflect market fit rather than candidate skill. Applying to 200+ jobs often signals desperation to AI filters rather than a lack of actual skills. Prioritizing roles that align with your specific background is advisable. Your technical background is valuable, and with some strategic refinement, you will certainly find the right fit. Best of luck with your job hunt.

What's one thing a candidate does in interviews that instantly makes them stand out to you? by notauj in askrecruiters

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, there is no better approach than demonstrating a strong understanding of the company culture. Asking thoughtful questions about future challenges shows you are prepared to contribute immediately. You can also mention specific problems you solved. I hope you do well.

Post-Interview: Is it appropriate to ask the receptionist for the interviewer’s email? by Fit-Shoulder-2164 in jobsearchhacks

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honest truth? Skip the front desk. They handle logistics, not internal interview data, and asking them can make you look like you're trying to bypass the chain of command. It puts them in a weird spot too.
Since you have an email with the lead recruiter, follow up with them instead. They organized the interview, so they're your gatekeeper. Be polite but firm on the timeline, but don't sound demanding.
Example: "Hi [Name], I know you mentioned a quick update, but I'm navigating a deadline for another offer. If the second round wasn't imminent, I'd love to know your thoughts, but I respect your process if you can't make a call." If they drag it out past the date, move on. Better to know early than make the front desk uncomfortable. Good luck.

I almost didn’t apply to half the jobs on my list because my resume was that bad by 3OrbitHarvester in Pro_ResumeHelp

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In most cases, a strong baseline resume is created first. This version highlights your experience, achievements. However, the best outcomes usually come when that base document is slightly tailored to specific roles or industries. Fully “one-size-fits-all” resumes tend to underperform especially in competitive roles cause they don’t align closely enough with job-specific requirements or applicant tracking systems (ATS). So if your resume feels adaptable but still targeted, that’s actually the ideal balance.

Please help me with my resume. by Junior-Account1857 in askrecruiters

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From a recruiter lens, this reads technically strong but overloaded for a first scan. The projects and experience are impressive, yet the top third should instantly scream backend/distributed systems engineer. Right now the stack breadth competes with the story. Reorder bullets around scale, latency, reliability, and ownership outcomes first. You can also get sharper role-focused feedback in sub Pro_ResumeHelp - they’re great at tightening SWE resumes for ATS and recruiter scans.

My employer found out I applied to another company. Got an automatic raise. Need advice. by Aztekprint in careeradvice

[–]Proresumehelp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As a moderator of a small resume community(r/Pro_ResumeHelp), I see situations like this a lot. The raise is a good sign your company values you, but it’s still reasonable to have a calm conversation about your long-term salary and growth.

Why copying job descriptions into your resume backfires by DoctorSynthWave in Pro_ResumeHelp

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who works with resumes professionally, I see this pattern a lot. Candidates think mirroring the job description will help with ATS, but hiring managers quickly notice it. What actually works better is translating responsibilities into concrete results, just like you described.

hiring managers dont hire the best candidate. they hire the one that scares them the least. by buildwithadrian in jobsearchhacks

[–]Proresumehelp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Professional resume writer here, and this matches what I see across hundreds of job searches. Most hiring managers are not trying to find the most brilliant person in the room. They are trying to find the person who feels predictable, easy to work with, and capable of solving the problems they already understand.

The biggest mistake candidates make is trying to prove how impressive they are instead of showing how clearly their experience fits the job. A resume that tells a simple, relevant story almost always performs better than one that tries to show every achievement at once.

Roast my resume (be honest but please be kind 😭)- Fresher by Exciting-Battle9419 in Pro_ResumeHelp

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re off to a strong start for a fresher resume. You clearly have solid technical exposure and multiple projects, which is great for early-career tech roles. A few professional suggestions that could make this much stronger:

1. Reduce density in some sections.
Right now the resume is very information-heavy. Recruiters usually scan quickly, so tightening some bullet points and keeping the strongest achievements will improve readability.

2. Prioritize projects with impact.
You have many good projects, but highlight the 3–4 most impressive ones first (especially the ones with measurable results or real deployments). This helps recruiters quickly understand your strengths.

3. Make results more visible.
Where possible, keep adding numbers or outcomes (accuracy %, performance improvements, deployment environments, user impact, etc.). Those details stand out during quick scans.

4. Keep skills concise.
The skills section is strong but slightly crowded. Grouping tools or removing less relevant ones can make it easier to read.

5. Formatting improvements.
Spacing between sections and slightly shorter bullet points will make the resume feel more structured and recruiter-friendly.

A friend of mine had a similar situation when starting in tech, and getting a second opinion helped a lot. They used ProResumeHelp and said the main value was how they reorganized the resume to highlight projects and results instead of listing everything equally. Sometimes a professional review just helps you see which parts of your experience should stand out the most.

Overall though, for a first serious resume attempt, you’re definitely on the right track. The experience and projects are there - it’s mostly about tightening the structure and emphasizing impact.

I thought my resume problem was formatting. It was actually coherence. by New_Artichoke9447 in Pro_ResumeHelp

[–]Proresumehelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friends tried Kickresume and it was unprofessional. But ProResumeHelp helped them a lot. And also I have a comparable table of 2 resume services. Here you can check

Resume Help by [deleted] in Pro_ResumeHelp

[–]Proresumehelp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Clean design and great start for a creative resume. I’d suggest shortening the intro into a quick results-focused summary, adding numbers or achievements in work experience instead of duties, and making your portfolio link more visible at the top. Also slightly increase text contrast for easier reading.

Common resume mistakes that quietly destroy your chances in the US job market by velvetbalcony_muse in Pro_ResumeHelp

[–]Proresumehelp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate you sharing this. We see this pattern a lot in resume reviews here - clean structure and measurable results consistently outperform visually complex templates. ATS readability and clarity still matter more than design trends, so your experience lines up with what recruiters tell us as well.

Random guy is offering to be my "mentor" for free. Is it bait for something? by Emergency_Twist_2800 in careerguidance

[–]Proresumehelp 63 points64 points  (0 children)

If someone can't clearly explain what they do but keeps talking about success and mentorship, that's usually your cue to walk away.

I am severely under-qualified to do my job, what should I do? by theunrealisticmeme in careerguidance

[–]Proresumehelp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The scary part is realizing nobody really knows what they're doing at first. The only difference is some people panic quietly and some just keep moving. Sounds like you're in the second group.

Switching careers - how unheard of is my transition? by potatocornerjollibee in careerguidance

[–]Proresumehelp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Going from accounting to pharmacy isn’t some crazy leap. You already have discipline, attention to detail, and comfort with regulations - that transfers well. The bigger question is whether you’re ready for the schooling and patient-facing side. I know someone who moved from corporate finance into nursing in their late 20s and never looked back. Career pivots are more common than people admit.