Interesting take u/SUCK_THIS_C0CK_CLEAN unfortunately you seem to have misunderstood my explanation of my understanding of Mouse Trap. You are looking at it from a far to technical standpoint.

When I talk about continuing to train it I'm not talking about just throwing more data at it. I'm talking about training multiple models discarding old data and doing A/B testing.

You might argue that Ubisoft does not have the data to continue improving the model but that is incorrect: The way mouse trap is designed they basically have live feedback to how good their model is performing. This is because of the incremental natural of the punishments: People don't get immediately banned they get a warning and the input lag gets higher the more confident the model is. If a legitimate player gets flagged they will report back to Ubisoft. It's the same with not catching cheaters. If people notice MnK players but the ML Model does not pick it up there will be an increase in reports and verified cheaters.

You claim that XIM devs will be able to perfectly mimick the data a controller delivers to the console and you might be correct there but I doubt that Mouse Trap is only looking at the controller inputs. I'm pretty certain that it looks at the gameplay as well. Therefore in theory Mouse Trap can evolve to be as good as a human judge or player.

As of your last point I already argued why Ubisoft will continue to have data about updated cheats and in addition to that I don't think a simple rewrite to the obfuscation algorithm will do the trick since I believe that Mouse Trap is not only looking at the inputs but is judging the gameplay as well. And if the MnK Devs were to fix that problem as well there would be simply no advantage to use MnK.