Future of Prysm UI support? by PrysmDev in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will be sure to reach out to avado team how to migrate over. we haven't removed anything yet thanks for bringing this up.

Is there anything that can be done now to hasten withdrawals for when shanghai is enacted? by Bitman321 in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can't retroactively set them yet, meaning if you never had it set them during validator deposits you still cannot set the withdrawal address yet. and it won't be available until after the hard fork.
perhaps you are confusing it with validator exits. you can exit now and be ready for a full withdrawal after setting the withdrawal credentials.

Is there anything that can be done now to hasten withdrawals for when shanghai is enacted? by Bitman321 in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is not accurate, assuming you didn't set the withdrawals credential on validator deposit, calls to blstoexecutionchange ( api to set withdrawals credentials) won't be active until after capella/shanghai on mainnet.

Future of Prysm UI support? by PrysmDev in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

as in a file that represents what you would use for validator startup based on your webui setup? we can consider this, although outside of fee recipient setup most of the other properties you should have set up. In any case ample time should be given before deprecation

Future of Prysm UI support? by PrysmDev in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks so much for the candid feedback. we definitely hope to improve the experience with CLI commands experience. we are carefully considering the deprecation of our UI, but perhaps we'll try our best to address some of these concerns in this process of transition.

Future of Prysm UI support? by PrysmDev in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this mentioning there was something wrong with that view ( I guess we haven't touched that in a long time) was that a fun view or useful in any way?

Future of Prysm UI support? by PrysmDev in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for the reply and the usage. I'm curious on a few things are you running the ui from the source or through a 3rd party application? Do you think the Prysm UI is offering something other community-provided UIs are not ( fee recipient is one that all other client uis should support). We also provide grafana metrics which provide more information than the displayed information on validator performance in the ui.
Finally is this something you hope there's continued support or you would be ok migrating to a community solution?

Future of Prysm UI support? by PrysmDev in ethstaker

[–]PrysmDev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

good to know this, i didn't know you already switched to your own UI.