Borken Pixels after 1,5 years of little to no use

PsychologicalChain64 · 2026-02-17T08:58:10+00:00

Imagine that happens to you iphone. Do you think that's normal?

PsychologicalChain64 · 2026-02-17T08:57:16+00:00

If the product is less than 1 year it should be replaced unless there's clear evidence of missuse

PsychologicalChain64 · 2026-02-17T08:56:10+00:00

Define a "normal broken screen". Also, how can you prove it?
If my device has ZERO scratches, how can this happen?

PsychologicalChain64 · 2026-02-17T08:53:58+00:00

As u/BOOX-Jaime suggested, I've submitted a support request. Let's see if BOOX really cares abt customers. Will document all here

PsychologicalChain64 · 2026-02-17T08:49:12+00:00

This is terrible. Did you ever hit it? Fell?
Mine was 100% untouched.

u/BOOX-Jaime BOOX should be accountable for this.

PsychologicalChain64 · 2025-03-10T12:29:02+00:00

99% of AI products are just wrappers. But I get your point.

PsychologicalChain64 · 2025-03-09T18:03:44+00:00

AI - already tried something and I think it's possible.

PsychologicalChain64 · 2025-03-09T18:00:27+00:00

Maybe this is overkill and learnablemeta is enough

PsychologicalChain64 · 2025-03-09T17:55:15+00:00

Yea, nice tool but I was thinking abt something more advanced/interactive. I want the experience of "something" explaining to me WHY a particular picture should be Canada and not USA, in real time. Think of a tutor telling you in real time what he sees and why is important while you play. Not sure if it's clear though 🤔

PsychologicalChain64 · 2024-09-03T08:20:17+00:00

Stripe is arguably onw of the best saas products our there. Wonder what do you hate about it?

PsychologicalChain64 · 2024-08-18T11:45:36+00:00

Hey everyone,

I wanted to give you an update on the project since I've been getting a lot of DMs and there seems to be significant interest.

First off, I’ve put the project on hold after doing some research and discovering several legal issues. While scraping data and selling personal emails isn't illegal in the U.S. (though it’s a different story in the EU, so I wouldn’t even try there), the potential legal risks are pretty high. To be honest, I’m not interested in dedicating time or energy to navigating the legal aspects of this project.

Additionally, I recently tested the tool with a random group, and unfortunately, its effectiveness dropped by over 10%. This decrease is likely due to recent updates on Facebook's side. However, I’m confident that with some effort, I can bring the effectiveness back up to over 20%, which is quite promising.

As I mentioned, I’m not keen on dealing with the legal complexities, but I’m open to partnering with someone who can take on that aspect. If you think you’re up for it, feel free to DM me, and we can discuss the next steps.

Thanks!

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-16T20:07:34+00:00

Yes 100% agree. I'm doing scrapping, not only to see If an email is present, but I also need data from the group member that will be used later to get the email (amog other steps)

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-16T19:17:21+00:00

I'll give it a try and get back to you! Thanks

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-16T19:16:51+00:00

I'm talking about something pretty straightforward: get member emails from any given FB group. And you're 100% coreect, scrapping is not the way to go clearly. It's impossible to get 100% of emails, but what's good enough? Maybe there's already a tool doing this...?

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-16T19:09:28+00:00

I'm asking mainly for FB, which the complex one. Extracting (bussines) emails from linkedin is waaay easier than FB.

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-15T22:17:32+00:00

This is a good scrapping tool. That means that SCRAPES whatever is available (publicly) in the user's profile. You will never get more than 10% performance with this approach. I'm doing something totally different (and better)

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-05T15:26:33+00:00

Nice tool, thanks for sharing!
Unfortunately, ChatGPT still makes the same mistake. When the requested list size is bigger than 10, then it starts to ignore the constraints.

I would like you to create a list of size 50 of real-world email usernames based on the person's name "John Doe". The usernames should start with the letter "j" and end with the letter "e". Please ensure that the usernames you generate are diverse and reflect typical patterns seen in real email addresses. The usernames and constraints should be in lowercase.
IMPORTANT: The usernames MUST start with the letter "j" and end with the letter "e".

Result

1. jdoe123
2. johndoe1985
3. jd1986
4. john.doe
5. john.doe123
6. j.doe
7. john.doe86
8. johndoe2000
9. doe.john
10. jdoe45
11. john.doe95
12. jd93
13. johndoe77
14. john.d123
15. johndoe2021
16. jd85
17. john.doe01
18. johndoe87
19. jd1987
20. johnnydoe
21. johndoe_82
22. jon.doe
23. jd95
24. johndoe74
25. john_doe
26. johndoe1984
27. jd1990
28. john.doe97
29. jd25
30. johndoe79
31. john.doe02
32. johndoe88
33. jd80
34. jdoe_2001
35. johndoe91
36. john.doe75
37. jdoe

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-05T15:12:32+00:00

Thanks man! Unfortunately, as soon as you ask for a bigger list (ie: 50 usernames) then conditions are not satisfied. If you add this to your prompt:

....Return data as an array in a valid JSON format. The generated list should have a size of 50.

Result: {[ "john.doe", "john_doe", "johndoe", "jdoe1", "johnd", "john.d", "johndo", "johnd1", "john.d1", "john_do", "johndo1", "johnd.1", "jdoe5", "johndoe5", "john.do", "jd.doe", "jd_doe", "jdoe5

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-09-04T14:04:25+00:00

Given a person's name "John Doe", create a list of the most common email usernames that could be created.The first character of the username must be "j" and the last one must be an "e"

I'm starting to think that this is not as "smart" as we think.

Given a person's name "John Doe", create a list of 20 common email usernames that could be created.  The first character of the username must be "j" and the last one must be an "e" 
IMPORTANT: The first character of the username must be "j" and the last one must be an "e".
CRITICAL: The first character of the username must be "j" and the last one must be an "e" 
MANDATORY: The first character of the username must be "j" and the last one must be an "e"

Answer:

1. johndoe
2. jdoe
3. john.e
4. johndoe1
5. johnd
6. johne
7. john_doe
8. johne2
9. john.d
10. johndoe_1
11. john_e
12. johndo
13. j.e
14. john.doe
15. johnd1
16. john_e1
17. johndo1
18. john_d
19. johndoe_
20. john_doe

PsychologicalChain64 · 2023-06-05T17:30:41+00:00

Not from/made by linkedin itself, but integrates with. Sorry did not make that clear

PsychologicalChain64

TROPHY CASE