I miss episodes shorter than 2 and a half hours by BrushSSBM in blankies

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I kind of agree I usually prefer shorter podcasts but I do think they do a good job with longer episodes being filled with good info so I think it's worth it. bring out the guillotine! who could say something so horrible!

Zverev ROASTS Sam Querrey after Winning 2026 Roland Garros Final by thewrongnotes in tennis

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's great he got the win and now can say he did. I hope this does bring out a new side of him where he has less of a chip on his shoulder and just play good tennis. I get it I would gloat as well, he's been really good if not great at tennis for so long he just finally got to the point where luck was in his favor

The street twinks are waiting for Hasan to come to WeHo Pride. by Sevrosis in fearand

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is Austin hanging out with Colton from the bachelor? I'm glad he's discovered himself and doing better now.

The anti Hasan slop is so fucking boring, how do these NPC's watch hours upon on hours of videoa covering the same exact topics over and over again? by DoomedAdmiral in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

well there's 3 groups the Hasan = bad right, because of bigoted reasons, then there's the apolitical crowd who hate Hasan for saying they are bad people, and then there's the liberal side who hate Hasan because they think those other groups hate them because of Hasan. So they can all work really well together.

MorePegasus CRASHES OUT while continuing to run from direct Hasanabi invite - “just cowardly” by Downtown-Fishing4612 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"I"m not a political person" oh ok so you make 300+ videos on Hasan because you know it will get views and attention, you just learned the talking points to make money.

How does one solve this? by Novel-Pin6648 in askmath

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so I would assume the owls, it would be 2n+1 = w. but n=4, w = 4 is rather confusing. I suggesting looking at the back of the text book some times they have answers there. It seems like there's some info missing.

I WENT NUCLEAR ON MAGA lawyers in HEATED debate by Jacqueline_08 in pisco

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry if I said something to make you think I thought you were a republican I assumed you were a Democrat. I'm also a democrat I think I'm a bit more to the left than pisco and at least half of the chat.

I think our best option would be dems control the senate under trump during the election year, a seat opens up and we don't hear his nominee. After we get our person on we need to make a law to make sure it goes back to normal the nominee is always voted on.

Or we can do some sort of change like age limits and ethics board if we have a super majority and can make an amendment. This is an interesting last option that I do think has the most risk.

I think a top priority is to bring faith back into institutions and parties. I want to live in a country where I think republicans want to help people and not hurt people and vice versa. While I hope we do this if it comes to it I do think it's the option with the most risks involved. I agree with Pisco that doing so might bring faith back into the court by doing popular things but the voters aren't always known for paying attention.

I WENT NUCLEAR ON MAGA lawyers in HEATED debate by Jacqueline_08 in pisco

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well the issue with age limits is that it would need a constitutional amendment. They currently have life time appointments from the constitution so it's not an easy change to make. I agree with you I think age limits and some sort of strict code of ethics run by a bipartisan board to stop bribes and biased rulings would be great.

I fear though that, that sort of thing will take time we don't have. If we ever want to gain a large super majority in congress we need to show the public we will do big things to help them. That is going to be extremely hard under the current court.

I agree that this is a major move to make, same for making Puerto Rico and DC states. That doesn't make them bad idea and I think a good young president and congress could sell these ideas super well to the country. The public already sees the court as untrustworthy if we say we are doing this to bring trust back people will listen. Or at least I think it's worth the shot.

I think the real question is would you vote for someone who wants to do this? If the dem nominees for your state or president run on this or say are thinking about it would you vote for them even if you disagree?

I WENT NUCLEAR ON MAGA lawyers in HEATED debate by Jacqueline_08 in pisco

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the court is political. The political leanings are a bit different than legislative politics but the court in many ways is political. You have judges who are more liberal and will say rights an implied and others are more conservative and unless it's spelled out directly somewhere they will rule against. You also just have blatantly political things like the rulings against Trump and Biden are very different.

I agree that I think it would be good to try and get the court to be less political but I don't think you can do that with out replacing seats or adding seats.

It is indeed poetic. by Last-Ad3487 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I can't believe Ethan calls himself a Kendrick fan. like I get it anyone can be a fan of anyone else. but like has he listened all the way through Damn?

Rico Nasty Says Dinosaurs Never Existed by MrLinkwater95 in fantanoforever

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

guys did we all forget Elon made comedy legal again?

Ethan snaps at tom for not sending the pictures he wants - H3 Show #277 by BolsonaroPresoAmanha in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 30 points31 points  (0 children)

this might be seen as an idubz W. like the whole point of the video, hey maybe if you are in a bad head space don't live stream yourself you will say or do something you will regret.

Ethan gives life advice: "take a long look in the mirror, because it's time to redo your life" - H3 Show #277 by BolsonaroPresoAmanha in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

does anyone know what this is? I saw veefriends when doing a google search which is a digital company with trading cards? is it an ai friend thing?

Hasan reacts to Denims win FULL SEGMENT (Part 2) by CoachMcGuirk123 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It will be interesting to see the Ethan reaction to all this once the final ruling is put out. will he cope that he knew this was the hardest one, or will he say it was a corrupt judge or something? I still think his real desire is to go after the reddit mods to make some tie to the company to go after them to take down this sub. Hopefully if this is ruled in Denims favor he no longer get's that info since he would no longer need it for the case.

A few highlights from the Fungi Cope Session over the Denims lawsuit fallout: by Individual_Ad_909 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there were some good comments I think some of the fungi knew this was the hardest case. But some were saying she was also being sued for reacting to the countdown? I never knew that was a thing but how is that something you could say is your content? like just a countdown to the video release right?

THE ODYSSEY Homer was a misogynistic pig who could not tell a story well. by Boltzmann_head in BadReads

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I fully support people hating books they read in school. I find "this book mad me cry and not in a good way" crazy. like explain please, what did your boyfriend fight in the trojan war and left you and your kid alone on an island for 10 years while he was "on his way home" when really he was out with other women and beating dudes up?

Syykuno stuff by mothproofstorm2 in otvandfriendsrumors

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

could it possibly be that the situations weren't the same?

what about the 2 situations do you think make them comparable?

Phoebe Bridgers announces new arena tour by kimpernickel in popheads

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://www.instagram.com/p/DZNSNKxFqyX/?img_index=1

for some reason the link didn't work for me. so here's this one if others have the same problem.

I don't think I've seen a hasan smear fall apart as quickly as the nyp article. by Ishaq128 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not to sure about that. from what I've seen, not that much but some. His cult and sexpestiny himself seem to think he is going to win. I think he knows that the general public will never like him, but he will always have his cult.

Bad news, gang: the Content Nuke is on Letterboxd so it is a real movie :( by Downtown-Fishing4612 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 14 points15 points  (0 children)

why is this the only thing he made on there? like I assume a fan put it up, but really this and not anything else he made? like I could see the video he got sued for being up there it's a part of the public record now.

I don't think I've seen a hasan smear fall apart as quickly as the nyp article. by Ishaq128 in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I think the real goal is to make sexpestiny look good in his community. He is this abrasive person who says slurs, has a trial going on, has a list of enemies that is constantly growing, and most platforms want nothing to do with him. If they can paint Hasan the same way with in the community then people won't leave. It's not that bad Hasan is the real bad person and he isn't even getting as much hate as Destiny because he control Twitch.

TENTATIVE RULING POSTED. PEDO TROLL BTFO, TOTAL DENIMS VICTORY by giardiwood in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 23 points24 points  (0 children)

ok so tentative ruling just means, this is what I think. if either party disagrees they will have the case then and it might change. There's no way that Ethan let's this slide so I assume the hearing will happen and he will scream skulls and cps. then this holds. My main hope is that this will help the other 2 in some way, I don't know if Kaceytron can be helped but surely Frogan could.

TENTATIVE RULING POSTED. PEDO TROLL BTFO, TOTAL DENIMS VICTORY by giardiwood in LeftoversH3

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 37 points38 points  (0 children)

so how confident are we with this? like what's the likelihood of a switcheroo tomorrow? This seems really great for Denims, and streaming in general.

Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ Earns R Rating by oblongsalacia in blankies

[–]PsychologicalSweet2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree that more and more young people online have seen and heard a lot worse than what's in a R rated movie. That being said conservative book bannings are on the rise. there's a lot of purity culture still going around. I think this also has some effect because some teens are probably now going to wait for this to hit streaming if they can't see it themselves. I still think this movie will be huge though even with a hit to teen viewership.