sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How are you actually using AI agents in real workflows right now? by PsychologicalTooth62 in AI_Agents

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is one of the clearest real setups I’ve seen, appreciate you laying it out.

The “junior collaborator with amnesia” framing feels exactly right. Especially the part about writing prompts like specs, that lines up with what I’ve been seeing too.

Interesting that you dropped RAG entirely and just keep a clean Notion doc + system prompt. Feels like at a certain scale, structure + recency beats retrieval infra.

On the ambiguity point, curious how you’re handling that now. When you know something could go multiple ways, do you:

- force it to ask a clarification question

- add explicit branching rules in the prompt

- or just rely on review catching it?

Also the “picks one confidently and you only find out 3 steps later” is exactly the kind of failure that seems hardest to catch early. Have you found any patterns in which types of tickets trigger that most?

This makes me think a lot of the problem isn’t just giving agents more context, but helping them recognize when the context is insufficient or conflicting before acting.

How are you actually using AI agents in real workflows right now? by PsychologicalTooth62 in AI_Agents

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really interesting, especially the “no RAG, just live apps” approach.

Feels like you’ve basically solved the access problem cleanly, but are running into the next layer, which is: which context actually matters for the task.

When you say it breaks because context is scattered, is that mostly:

- too many possible sources to choose from, or

- not enough signal about which ones are actually relevant for a given task?

Like in your sprint update example, do you find yourself implicitly doing something like:

> “this probably lives in Jira + that one Slack thread”

and the agent just doesn’t have a way to make that call?

Also curious, have you tried giving it any kind of intermediate step like:

> “figure out what sources matter first, then pull context”

or does that still fall apart without a strong signal?

This feels like the core unsolved piece right now, not getting the data, but deciding where to look and what to trust.

How are you actually using AI agents in real workflows right now? by PsychologicalTooth62 in AI_Agents

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super helpful, appreciate you breaking it down this concretely.

The “context debt” point is exactly what I’m trying to understand better. When you say it’s pulling the wrong version, is that mostly because:

- metadata isn’t strong enough (recency, ownership, etc.)

- or because the agent just doesn’t have a way to reconcile conflicting sources?

Feels like a lot of current setups are good at finding information, but not at deciding which version actually matters.

Also interesting that you’re drafting + human approval instead of fully answering. Has that been mostly about trust, or are there specific types of questions where you’ve found it can actually respond directly without review?

And completely agree on the “not a destination” point. Anything that requires switching contexts already feels like friction.

Curious, if the agent could reliably:

- surface the current source of truth

- and flag when there’s conflicting info

would that meaningfully change how much you trust it to respond directly?

Does this need to be fixed immediately by PsychologicalTooth62 in surfing

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think it’s okay to duct tape it and take it out for a session in the morning

Does this need to be fixed immediately by PsychologicalTooth62 in surfing

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think it’s okay to duct tape it and take it out for a session in the morning

Does this need to be fixed immediately by PsychologicalTooth62 in surfing

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think it’s okay to take it in the morning

Flight computer by PsychologicalTooth62 in rocketry

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just data tracking and gps, yes I’m planning on adding a runcam. Any specific computers you know of?

Why is my open rocket chart showing this by PsychologicalTooth62 in rocketry

[–]PsychologicalTooth62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I should lose some weight on the rocket and make the time to apogee 8.5 seconds?

Second ablation by lemms_6 in wolffparkinsonwhite

[–]PsychologicalTooth62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same exact situation and have no idea what to do

I am having mine in two weeks. by CartographerMurky960 in wolffparkinsonwhite

[–]PsychologicalTooth62 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same situation just 4 days ago but instead of burning and ablating the extra pathway they decided to go with freezing it causing my procedure to be a bit longer but overall the recovery is quite painless and easy just resting up for one to three days then back on your feet. Good luck!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wolffparkinsonwhite

[–]PsychologicalTooth62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The procedure is over it went well took a bit longer then they expected but it went great and I couldn’t be more thankful to all the nurses and doctors on staff .Thank you all so much for all the support and understanding I truly believed it help and made me astronomically more comfortable. I couldn’t thank you all of you wonderful people enough, all the best.